Not exact matches
On the basis that the result of the legislative provisions would probably be that the valuer would find that the shares in Northern Rock was either nil or a «derisory» sum, the claimants submitted that that was a case of expropriation without compensation, which could be
justified under Art 1 of the First Protocol only in
exceptional circumstances.
Where a balancing of the factors
under the Morin analysis, such as seriousness of the offence and prejudice, would have weighed in favour of a stay, we expect that the Crown will rarely, if ever, be successful in
justifying the delay as a transitional
exceptional circumstance under the Jordan framework.
At para 70, the Court cited its decision in R. v. Williamson as an example of delays exceeding the ceiling which can not be
justified under any transitional
exceptional circumstances, despite the serious nature of the offence.