Sentences with phrase «justify criticism by»

Typical of the IPCC devotees, drag in all the red herrings you can lay you hands on and try to justify criticism by talking off subject.

«In their opinion piece, Simopoulos and DiNicolantonio call upon public health bodies to establish nutrition policies based on science, but they justify their criticisms by advancing an unproven hypothesis on the adverse effects of omega - 6 polyunsaturated fatty acids, derived largely from theoretical arguments and animal studies, as if it were established fact.

Not exact matches

I believe that a sober and instructed criticism of the Gospels justifies the belief that in their central and dominant tradition they represent the testimony of those who stood nearest to the facts, and whose life and outlook had been moulded by them.

Some of the recent criticism has been justified but there has never been a level playing field when we are judged by the media.

Jose Mourinho was critical of his players after the loss to the Baggies, and Henry believes the Portuguese's criticism was justified as he was the only one not getting carried away by the win at City.

Especially notable was FDA's criticism of a trial undertaken by GSK, called RECORD, often cited by the company to justify keeping Avandia on the market.

In other words, until the No Kill movement came into its own and proved that shelter killing can be eliminated, PETA attempted to defray criticism for its killing by cloaking it in the euphemisms and rationalizations used to justify shelter killing, even though, in reality, they do not act in a sheltering capacity.

During an interview with IndieGames.com, Rodriguez was asked if the recent criticism leveled at modern Japanese games by entirely likable and not - smug - at - all indie developers, Jonathan Blow and Phil Fish - who I shall now collectively refer to as BlowFish, witty and original wordsmith that I am - was justified.

If the criticism is seen to be justified by most other experts then that puts pressure on the journal to improve their peer review standards.

The criticism leveled at Norway's greenhouse gas emissions plan is a necessary part of the global conversation, especially if Norway's leaders were claiming more than could be justified by the data.

If you've been following the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) global heating releases, you know that there has been a lot of criticism by most scientists involved that the national governments are going out of their way to tone down the group's conclusions so they don't sound so dire and so the governments can justify doing the absolute minimum (in some cases that means nothing, nada, zip) to forestall global heating.

[102a] To the extent his «expertise» is not in fact grounded in science, the MHP deflects serious criticism of and inquiry into that reality by posturing as if it does not matter anyway because somehow he is the «expert» of ordinary life too — educated, visionary, sophisticated, and broad - minded — justifying the substitution of his judgment over that of presumably provincial and flawed ordinary others, and the provision of his «services» for «therapeutic jurisprudence» to «families».