But they can't
justify their beliefs so they are incapable of partaking in logical discussion.
Not exact matches
Even the atheist has to «believe» that there is no god,
so at the core, they're just another weird religion trying to prove that their
beliefs are more
justified and plausible than someone else's.
On want grounds do you
justify your
belief to, Hindu's, Buda and others... Just because a book that was written 1900 years ago with any proof what
so ever in any God.
He believed that the Jews had corrupted christianity,
so distanced himself from the overall religion, while all the while claiming
belief in the Christian god, the god of abraham, his «god Almighty», and
justified his actions through
belief in YOUR god.
Trying to use another country's hate and prejudice to
justify you own is
so backwards and ignorant it is beyond
belief.
So sad when believers try to
justify belief by using false science.
So, when you say it is just my personal
belief and opinion, I would still ask you to «
justify» your personal
belief and opinion....
Instead they
justified that
belief by taking action on it
so making the
belief stronger and the injustice of those acts greater.
(This
belief is often made to
justify the intensity of our rhetoric about pedophilia: The stakes are supposed to be
so high.)
Here's your problem, you are tying all actions into your supernatural
beliefs, and
so of course you wouldn't think that people who reject your
belief would be
justified in feeling anything at all.
Doctrine and Covenants 134:7 7 We believe that rulers, states, and governments have a right, and are bound to enact laws for the protection of all citizens in the free exercise of their religious
belief; but we do not believe that they have a right in justice to deprive citizens of this privilege, or proscribe them in their opinions,
so long as a regard and reverence are shown to the laws and such religious opinions do not
justify sedition nor conspiracy.
I endure direct challenges to my
belief system routinely and grow the wiser with each encounter; not hardening my position but encouraging me to think more deeply and walk the line of humanistic values all the further to
justify myself to those who ask me to do
so.
The general Christian
belief is that God snuffed out most people in the
so - called Great Flood and any pregnant women's unborn children would have already been determined as sinners by God and therefore
justified in His eyes, right?
But I think it will challenge both those who are pro-gay and not... to understand why the desire to be right, or to at least be
justified in your
beliefs is
so damn strong.
Which is how they
justify their own pushing of their
beliefs... «I am commanded to do it,
so I must.»
At the same time, the other theologies that have contributed most to explicating and
justifying the metaphysical implications of the Christian witness seem to have been typically preoccupied more with theoretical questions of
belief and truth than with practical issues of action and justice, and
so have contributed only indirectly to clarifying and answering our central question.
You are trying twisting what I am saying and putting it into a negative light
so YOU feel
justified in your head the
belief in a god.
We make Jesus fit our lifestyle...
justifying actions or
belief with scripture that leave others scratching their heads... but it fascinates me how we are all
so different yet passionate about our walk of following Jesus.
Shameful, for a great man to loose his
beliefs and compromise his faith and
justify a cult for gain... A man that lead
so many to the cross to compromise in this way is a slap to all Christians... Rev. Billy Graham and his son Franklin Graham are leading his flack to Hell by condoning and
justifying this Mormon cult... I will never listen or support them again...
Kepler in the 16th century
justified his shattering empirical discovery that planetary motion was ellipitcal rather than circular by the essentially medieval and mystical
belief that the circle represented the spiritual and the straight line the material,
so the combination of the two in an ellipse showed the planets «striving to reach the divine ideal».
If you're raising an eyebrow at that, you're probably reasonable to do
so; but my long - held
belief is that indexes (the implicit comparison most people will have made to my target figure) are grounding and self -
justifying benchmarks.
Therefore the prior charges failed to alert the person charged to the importance of a young person's age in relation to sexual behaviour, and
so could not
justify depriving that person, if later charged with a sexual offence against an older child of the reasonable
belief defence.
Many writers and investors questioned the high levels of confidence that surrounded this latest update, but
so far that
belief appears to have been entirely
justified.
The question is, can an investor
justify and support the
belief that over time, prices will go up and to the right,
so to speak.