Sentences with phrase «justifying their beliefs with»

How do you justify that belief with regards to what Article VI, Section 3 of the Constîtution?

I'm sick of the academic dishonesty of people justifying their beliefs with outright lies, zero proof, hearsay, and myth — be them religious people or otherwise.

Not exact matches

Tech companies with no profits (or even much of a business plan) soared to extreme valuations that were justified, in part, by the belief that future profits would be made faster and that equities were less risky than in the past.

And in the nicest possible way, this is what you are doing ALREADY... you are trying to «spin» this story and to «justify» it to fit with your current belief schema instead of just recognizing the overly obvious that it isn't real.

On want grounds do you justify your belief to, Hindu's, Buda and others... Just because a book that was written 1900 years ago with any proof what so ever in any God.

He acted like an ASS and attacked my husband and child last night and attempted to justify it with his belief.

Secondly, as a priest ordained in Rome where he knows that the Basilica would be totally against his assertion, he uses euphemisms to cloud the mind of a reader thinking quoting wrong scriptures with the intent to seduce would suffice — his own roots denounce his deeds and / or beliefs but he axiomatically wants to hold both the roots and wings to no avail, read the book and the truth shall set you free... This is exactly what happens when a gay priest turned professor what to justify his perverted lifestyle... I rest my case

At least it's a belief that's consistent with the facts and doesn't require an elaborate web of unsupported theories and claims to justify it.

«We form our beliefs for a variety of subjective, personal, emotional, and psychological reasons in the context of environments created by family, friends, colleagues, culture, and society at large; after forming our beliefs we then defend, justify, and rationalize them with a host of intellectual reasons, cogent arguments, and rational explanations.

1) self serving and delusion when the belief its an omnipotent deity with no proof whatsover 2) mankind can justify any behavior 3) projecting and assuming

We're more concerned with the followers of your imaginary friend and the way they use their belief to justify harm to others.

@Mark To be clear, I would see granting exemptions if the organization was expressly religious, like an actual church, but merely being guided by the religious principles of the founder simply doesn't justify preventing coverage to those within the organization with different beliefs, atti.tudes, and morals.

Personally, I did not have a struggle to become an atheist, but rather a struggle with my religious beliefs, and the immense effort it took trying to justify them.

You can play with semantics to justify your position as much as you want, but the truth is that any belief can be tarnished by fanaticism.

Considering the chaos, destruction, death wars, faster spread of disease, murders, slavery, attempted genocide... all justified by belief in the bible... 40,000 different versions of christianity, with each person interpretting it differently... clearly chaos (a tool of the devil) then you see all of the things that are flat out wrong... it becomes clear

With Davidson he affirms a strong version of philosophical antifoundationalism, claiming that beliefs can be justified only by other beliefs.

If a religionist had to stand on their own with only their own mind to justify what they have been accepting as common belief they would be terrified if they thought all around them rejected what they thought was believed by all.

People that come up with their own beliefs are people that can think for themselves and process new information better without declaring a war to justify their level of corruption.

I endure direct challenges to my belief system routinely and grow the wiser with each encounter; not hardening my position but encouraging me to think more deeply and walk the line of humanistic values all the further to justify myself to those who ask me to do so.

Nothing is necessarily wrong with this except for the fact that you conservative Christians are trying to justify and spin her philosophy to fit your beliefs and it doesn't work that way.

For if Bultmann's final defense of an existentialist theology is not that it is apologetically imperative, but that it is, with respect to belief, the contemporary expression of the Pauline doctrine that we are justified by faith alone without the works of the law, it seems to me that the final and comparably sufficient defense of a liberation theology is that it is, with respect to action, the contemporary expression of the equally Pauline doctrine that the only faith that justifies is the faith that works by love.

They will even justify killing each other in direct contradiction with their «beliefs».

At the same time, the other theologies that have contributed most to explicating and justifying the metaphysical implications of the Christian witness seem to have been typically preoccupied more with theoretical questions of belief and truth than with practical issues of action and justice, and so have contributed only indirectly to clarifying and answering our central question.

Here you might begin to justify your selection based on its consistency with the options you have chosen in the previous exercises, in other words, based on how it fits with other beliefs you hold.

The bible appears to promote violence in selected passages, but the very fact that Christians analyze scripture with the underlying belief that there is such a thing as an objective truth and morality we don't have the freedom in our doctrine to falsely interpret passages from Leviticus to justify killing while ignoring Christ and the ten commandments.

You are one who has attempted to justify your empty beliefs by supporting them with your version of mans story of creation.

There can be no doubt that Whitehead's understanding of Descartes involves a serious concern with the Cartesian problem of justifying our belief in realism: Whitehead's debt to tradition is not inconsiderable.

We make Jesus fit our lifestyle... justifying actions or belief with scripture that leave others scratching their heads... but it fascinates me how we are all so different yet passionate about our walk of following Jesus.

In the case of christians, it is them using their belief to justify hate against gays; oppression of women (ie; telling them what they should and shouldn't do with their bodies; basically anything that steps on a persons equal rights within a free country.

I think my point is that people try to justify their beliefs and mix them with their religious background as a justification.

European Council Directive 2000 / 78 / EC, which established «a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation», sets out in Article 4.2 that organisations with an ethos based on religion or belief, such as «faith» schools, can treat persons differently in recruitment and employment on the grounds of religion or belief where there is «a genuine, legitimate and justified occupational requirement».

Bearing this in mind, section 60 (5)(a) could and would, if necessary, be construed and applied by a court or tribunal as permitting preferential decisions on grounds of religious belief, only to the extent that such decisions were consistent with genuine, legitimate and justified occupational requirements.»

In his actions, Diaz (not to be confused with his son, the borough president, who is a gary marriage supporter) is asserting that his personal religious beliefs are enough to justify denying an entire group of New Yorkers the multitude of benefits that come with legal marriage — the right to visit your partner in the hospital should they get sick, the right to access your spouse's health insurance coverage, to name just a couple.

After forming our beliefs, we then defend, justify and rationalize them with a host of intellectual reasons, cogent arguments and rational explanations.

Through communication with the public, we must continue to provide the evidence that may justify those beliefs — indeed, this is the mission of AAAS.

He fills you with a belief that may or may not be justified.

He says «deeper learning» combines a focus on in - depth academic knowledge and skills — and tends to embrace the goals of the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards — with the belief that students must also master communication skills, learn to collaborate effectively, and own, manage and justify their own learning to be truly college and career ready.

With an incredibly skilled and community of indie devs and plenty of government support via Film Victoria, we were always confident that more wonderful titles would be on the way, and I found a pair of titles that justified my beliefs.

Then you proceed to use the results of your experiment to justify changing policies for the entire world at a cost of many trillions of dollars, with the unerring belief that your experimental data is completely reliable.

Often justified largely on the basis of junk science they have come up with such wonderful policy prescriptions as using only unreliable sources of energy because they are «sustainable,» keeping natural resources in the ground rather than using them to meet human needs, having government tell manufacturers what requirements their products must meet to use less energy rather than encouraging manufacturers to meet the needs of their customers, all in the name of «energy efficiency,» substituting government dictates for market solutions on any issue related to energy use, and teaching school children junk science that happens to meet «environmentalists» ideological beliefs in hopes of perpetuating these beliefs to future generations even though they do not conform to the scientific method, the basis of science.

The relationship among rational belief, well justified partial positions, and robustness exists because believing a partial position with a higher degree of justification provides a thesis that can be extended flexibly in many different ways when constructing a complete position and is more immune to falsification.

Then stop doing that... don't justify your nonsense with calling science a belief system.

Clearly, the deceptive IPCC science was created with the belief that the end justifies the means.

In any event, if the paper has no merit, it justifies a retraction procedure or a dignified well - crafted rebuttal in the literature — or even a dignified well - argued rebuttal posted on a respectable blog — not this public theater of the absurd, with unsupported assertions and increasingly unpleasant attacks on the character, competence and religious beliefs of the author.

Faced with this infinity of prior PDFs, a member of the «subjective Bayesian» school selects one of them and justifies this selection as being an expression of his / her subjective belief.

They will come up with ever more fanciful reasons to justify their delusional beliefs.

With no basis in fact, Mr Turnbull's claim that Australia is a world leader should be seen as an epic lie of the kind that becomes possible only for those who hold a fervent belief in a greater cause that justifies a falsehood of this magnitude.

Therefore the prior charges failed to alert the person charged to the importance of a young person's age in relation to sexual behaviour, and so could not justify depriving that person, if later charged with a sexual offence against an older child of the reasonable belief defence.

ii) refusal to do the job: I think it is entirely justified to find that doing the job set out in one's job description is a BFOQ, and one should not be able to refuse to do it on the grounds that doing it with respect to people who have a right to have it done would offend one's religious beliefs.

In order to successfully claim indirect discrimination, the claimant must demonstrate that the respondent has applied a provision, criterion or practice («PCP»); that PCP puts or would put someone with the claimant's religion or belief at a particular disadvantage when compared to other persons; the PCP puts or would put the claimant at that disadvantage and the PCP can not be justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.