Both firms should attempt to avoid
justifying use of a name by asserting that clients will be affected by a particular choice.
Not exact matches
They
use their god to
justify their actions and go so far to kill in the
name of their god.
Think
of the ways in which the
name and authority
of Jesus have been
used to
justify every sort
of human cruelty.
In their comments, some readers have asked about practical ways in which we can kick the habit
of using God's
name carelessly in order to
justify our decisions and desires.
I was raised christian, but that or other religions seem to
use their religion to
justify judgement and hatred towards all
of Gods people in his
name.
Let's also not forget the many, many people who have killed or enslaved others in the
name of God or
used the Bible to
justify their atrocious actions.
From its first conception faith based religion has been
used to
justify killing and rally people to commit murder in the
name of a god who does not exist.
On the other hand, Hitler and few
of his officers were true - blue and cold - blooded atheists and
used the
name of religion to
justify their atrocities.
And Religious people have NEVER been condescending, they have NEVER persecuted others for their beliefs, They have NEVER killed in the
name of their God or even worse
used the
name of their God to
justify killings for political, territorial, and economic reasons or even just because they hate someone.
Nobody commits atrocities in the
name of religion but there's a lot
of people that HIDE behind religion and
USE the
name of religion to
justify their atrocities... and they are... the TRUE - BLUE & COOL BLOODDED... ATHEISTS.
You do, but you only
use the
name of Jesus to
justify your evil deeds at the expense
of Christians.
It has been
used to
justify all manner
of atrocities in the
name of bringing enlightement.
~ the music and visual entertainment that resembles more to something spewed out
of the pits
of hell, then something human beings would dream up, unless they are demon possessed... ~ the perversion
of God's natural order and His intent for human kind, and
justifying of it, calling it good, even
using the
Name of Christ to
justify it, such as this article is clearly showing...
If we already presuppose, then, that the theistic religious language employed by the Christian witness in authorizing faith in God's love as our authentic self - understanding can be metaphysically
justified, we can say — as I, in fact, have already been saying — that ultimate reality includes not only the self and others but also the encompassing whole
of reality that theists refer to when they
use the
name «God.»
Mark never showed the
name disciples as making the transition he was prescribing - presumably because the militant Christians
of his day were
using the Twelve as patrons to
justify their refusal to move on to greater maturing.
Use any argument you want to
justify, defend, or denounce those things man - made, but never bring the
name of our Lord and saviour into the argument as a means to an end.
And sadly we have seen people
use the
name of each
of these Abrahamic faiths to wage and
justify violence.
There is one god, one spirit and if humans want to
use the
name of God to
justify their zealousnes, whoa to them, they are blind and foolish.
Its leaders launch them in the
name of the suffering poor,
using the reality
of widespread misery to
justify seizures
of power — which brings much more misery.
But some anthropologists said his 1968 ethnography, Yanomamö: The Fierce People, exploited the tribe by breaking their taboo on
using the
names of the dead; others argued that its emphasis on violent encounters helped governments
justify invasions
of Yanomamö territory.
Often
justified largely on the basis
of junk science they have come up with such wonderful policy prescriptions as
using only unreliable sources
of energy because they are «sustainable,» keeping natural resources in the ground rather than
using them to meet human needs, having government tell manufacturers what requirements their products must meet to
use less energy rather than encouraging manufacturers to meet the needs
of their customers, all in the
name of «energy efficiency,» substituting government dictates for market solutions on any issue related to energy
use, and teaching school children junk science that happens to meet «environmentalists» ideological beliefs in hopes
of perpetuating these beliefs to future generations even though they do not conform to the scientific method, the basis
of science.
Use of another firm
name could suggest an affiliation to a consumer — it's the kind
of deceptive practice the bar would be
justified in curtailing.
In 2016, a top Facebook executive wrote in an internal company memo that said Facebook may be
used to coordinate terrorist attacks and that it might cause deaths from bullying, but that those effects were
justified in the
name of corporate growth.