Sentences with phrase «k per»

Contractors who know the systems for the remodel per remodel number (they go to home depot and know exactly what sku # to pick up and labor is coming in at $ 2 - 4 k per room.

It requires virtually no start up money and you can make between 50 and 100 k per year if you really hustle and put in the time to understand the system.

In full crank mode, I send out 500 pieces of mail a week -LRB-.37 cents apiece for postcards, or.50 cents apiece for yellow letters), and I average 6.5 k per month.

This is an exceptional opportunity for an experienced Recruitment Consultant to take over an established desk (billing # 20,000 K per month) focused on the supply of Engineers into the Nuclear sector (jobs include design, construction, installation and maintenance).

Job title: Sales Executive Availability: Immediate start date Salary: # 13.7 k - # 14.5 k per annum + uncapped commission structure.

According to Bloomberg, disclosures in Kobayashi's report Mt. Gox's website indicate that the trustee has averaged roughly $ 10.5 k per Bitcoin during his initial sell - off period.

If I go with Traditional Plans (LIC / Kotak), then Premium amount is coming close to 40 - 45 K per Annum and with maturity amount after 20 years as around 12 L.

Now my question is, I want an investment of 25 - 30 K per annum expecting good return and tax saving.

I want to save 10 k per month 6 in MF and 4 in PPF.

Services are bit slow but the policy coverage is 70 % and the amount of Rs. 25 K per month is given after policy maturity.

The payback returns are ~ 28 K per month after policy get mature.

Policy coverage is 93 % and the claim are high, the amount after maturity of policy is of Rs. 33 K per month.

Rs. 22 K per month.

So at present I along with her together can save more than 30 K per month.

I can invest upto 15 to 20 k per month as of now and can increase by 10 % — 15 % every year.in Next two year my home loan will be ending so can move EMI amount of 20k to MF SIP.

Policy coverage is 80 - 90 % and the claim is of Rs. 25 K per month after policy ends.

The investment is 29.7 K per year with extra benefit that is it includes the inbuilt accidental death benefit.

The premiums are ~ Rs. 7 K per month.

The policy coverage is 80 % and the premiums are low ~ 25 K per year.

Policy coverage is 88 % and claims are around 41 K per month.

The returns are high ~ Rs. 42 K per month for each.

Policy coverage is high approx. 87 % but the investments is low around 33.9 K per year till policy ends.

Premiums are less ~ 32 K per year and the returns are around 29 L. Services are really fast and the response through executives and staff members are nice.

The investments are 37 K per year.

I'm relaxed now for my future, the returning amount is 46 K per month after the policy end.

The premiums are low ~ 38 K per year and the returns are high 43 L after policy ends.

Investment is 41 k per year but the returns are 29.4 L. Ambulance facilitate for free and the billing is payed by the policy plan no extra money is payed by the policy holder.

The policy coverage is high ~ 81 % and the claim is around Rs. 32 K per month after policy get mature.

The policy coverage is 82 % and return is ~ Rs. 35 K per month.

Policy coverage is 85 % and claims are high and the payback amount is around Rs. 38 K per month.

Investment is 32 K per year and the returns are 1.25 times the sum assured.

Now I'm relaxed for my future, the returning amount is Rs. 44 K per month after the policy end.

Premiums are low 7 K per month.

Policy coverage are 92 % and the claims are ~ Rs. 34 K per month.

Does there exist some constitutional right to be paid $ 200 + K per year while still being carried in a Snugli?

If there is none over sea then we should multiply this by a factor of about 0.3 to get to a global figure of 0.04 K per decade.»

On global scale, the extra heat in CRUTEM3 land data compared to UAH on NH is 0,088 K per decade.

Meanwhile I've been playing with numbers on AMSU - A and 1999 - 2009 (the longest period with whole years of data) has a strong positive trend, 4.8 K per century.

The first comprehensive review of temperature trends at heights of about 50 to 100 km (6) reveals, after slight updating, the following trends: (i) moderate negative trends of about 2 to 3 K per decade at heights of 50 to 70 km, with the largest magnitude in the tropics; (ii) slightly larger cooling trends at heights of 70 to 80 km in the low and middle latitudes; (iii) essentially zero temperature trends between 80 and 100 km.

However, the paper Jim in SC linked to gave a maximum warming rate of 3 K per year when colder (admittedly before the start of your chart) and 0.17 K when warmer.

Well Crok, if ECS had a value of 0.2 K per doubling CO2 emissions, then climate change will not be as catastrophic as IPCC requires (because, then, the «carbon emission trading» will be a nonsense).

In other words, the stepwise increase of the back radiation by the additional 0.062 W / m ^ 2 per year results in the stepwise increase of the temperature of water (within the layer of 5 cm) by 0.00005 K per year.

According to the satellite measurements, the mean temperature of the lower part of mesosphere is increasing by approximately 0.167 K per 10 years which is related to the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere.

10μm of ocean skin has a heat capacity of 42 J / K per m ²

In the absence of any other change in heat flow (an unphysical assumption but let's use this as a thought experiment), instead this increases the temperature by (initially) 100/42 = 2.4 K per second.

These are the surface temperatur trends in K per decade (with 2 sigma intervals) since 1997 (using 17 plus years as claimed by Taylor):

A significant annual - mean cooling of the lower stratosphere over the past two decades (of approximately 0.6 K per decade) has been found over the mid-latitudes of both hemispheres.»

According to RSS / MSU, from 1979 to Jul 2008, the TLT trend is.17 K per decade (Christy and Spencer,.147) But there are 3 other bands.

(if my assertion is correct, than my estimate of human influence from 1974 can never be more then 1/13 x 0.012 x 100 = 0.1 degree C or K per century and is probably a lot less because the increase in maxima also pushes up some great part of the minima.)

Your first clue should be the published range for ECS: 1.5 - 4.5 K per doubling of CO2.