Not exact matches
The remarkable
ethical point about Wang Yang - ming was that in his vigorous and active life he continually
kept his immediate practical concerns in contact with his metaphysical tradition concerning
value.
To what extent do you view your investing life as an extension of your personal life?By that I mean to what extent do the personal morals and
ethical values of Tim the man govern the investing decisions of Tim the dividend growth investor?If you ask your typical dividend growth investor if they would be willing to invest in a lucrative but immoral venture, say selling child pornography or crack cocaine, the answer would probably be «absolutely not» regardless of the yield, valuation or growth prospects of the underlying venture.And yet, ask that same investor what their thoughts are about Phillip Morris and they would probably describe what a wonderful investment it is and go on about why you should own it.Do your personal morals ever come into play when buying companies, or do you compartmentalize your conscience, wall it off from the part of your brain that thinks about investments, and make your investing decisions based on the financial prospects of the company?The reason why I'm asking is that I
keep identifying stocks of companies that I love from an investing perspective but despise on a human level.I can not in good conscience own any piece of Phillip Morris knowing the impact that smoking related illness has on the families of smokers.You might say that the smoker made his choice to smoke so you don't mind taking his money, but his children never made that choice and they are the ones who will suffer when he dies 20 years too soon.
Trust is a core belief and
value of these leaders which they work hard to earn and
keep, e.g. by walking their talk, by communicating frequently and openly, by taking a stand (even if it's not a popular one), by empowering others, and by following high
ethical standards.»
Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all of the following are true for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution of the issues, (b) you would like to
keep open the possibility of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have
ethical or spiritual beliefs that place high
value on taking personal responsibility for handling conflicts with integrity, (f) you
value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and often unpredictable range of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available in the public court system and want a more creative and individualized range of choices available to you and your spouse or partner for resolving the issues.
The objectives of this course are (1) competence in handling the most significant legal issues relevant to the practice of marriage and family therapy, including confidentiality, dangerousness, malpractice and expert testimony; (2) heightened awareness of the requirements for
ethical practice, including an understanding of how your own
values will impact your work and (3) development of a professional identity as a family therapist, and an understanding of how to
keep that identity current.