While I don't know if it is ever stated exactly this way, it sometimes seems that we teach that Jesus
kept the law perfectly so that as the only perfect person, He could credit His righteousness to our account.
«If Israel would only
keep the Law perfectly for one day the Kingdom would come.»
Not exact matches
You really can't be telling me that all the 613
laws were
perfectly kept by anyone.
I hope you do realize that the
law must be
kept perfectly.
Frustrated, you are absolutely correct, but confusion between kill and murder or false accusations that Christians try to force their «religion» on people while they themselves are hypocrites because they do not
perfectly keep the
law is not the pb.
So not only did the
law not justify the one who
kept the primary commandment of the
law perfectly, thus showing the sinfulness of those under it, and their inability to judge righteously, but it shows that Jesus was vindicated by God for his trust even unto death, apart from the
law's judgment, and that he was righteous in doing so.
This is why they first need to be humbled, to understand that they have not, and could not
keep God's
law perfectly.
The real faith or belief must lead to the righteousness of the sinner (you are no sinner, if you
keep the ten commandments more than
perfectly; love is the fullfillment of the
law; you have got that supernatural love?).
The Premier, the Honourable Dalton McGuinty, expressed the following view as part of a news conference: «The Attorney General has made it
perfectly clear this is unacceptable, it's not in
keeping with practice and in fact, it's against the
law....