Not exact matches
Peer review in climate science means that the «team» recommends publication of each other's work, and tries to
keep any off - message
paper from being
accepted for publication.
Not much to say about it, but remember to
keep tweeting good stuff and not only «another
paper accepted in Nature».
(
Keep all correspondence with journals for at least 6 months after the
paper is
accepted for publication.)
In November, several weeks after the
paper was
accepted but before it was published, the patient was readmitted to Karolinska with complications that ultimately required a stent to
keep his airway open.
When you have
accepted the
paper it is yours to
keep, it will never be re-sold to an alternate client and every part of the transaction is led with a faithful appreciation for your security.
Or, he could have
kept quiet and issued his press release only after the
paper has been finished (after review) and
accepted.
My guess is that Watts hasn't been able to get a journal to
accept the
paper yet (not necessarily a negative if it's a skeptical
paper), so that's why he's
keeping the data under wraps.