Property owners also have a legal duty to
keep their properties reasonably safe from fire hazards.
All property owners have a duty to
keep their property reasonably safe for lawful visitors and may be held accountable for a visitor's injuries arising out of a dangerous condition on the property.
Premises liability refers to a landowner's obligation to
keep his property reasonably safe for people that come on to his property.
Massachusetts landowners and occupiers of land must generally
keep their property reasonably safe for visitors.
The highest court in Massachusetts, the Supreme Judicial Court, held in that case that private landowners must
keep their property reasonably clear of snow and ice.
In all trip and fall cases, you must prove that the owner of the property was negligence and that your injury would not have occurred if the owner
kept their property reasonably safe.
This is based on premises liability which holds that owners and occupiers of property have a duty to
keep their property reasonably safe for visitors.
Premises liability is the legal term for the responsibility of owners of real estate to
keep their properties reasonably safe.
To make a negligence claim after a fall accident in Maine, the plaintiff must show a property owner failed to exercise reasonable care to
keep a property reasonably safe.
Generally, in these cases, it is necessary for the plaintiff to prove that the owner failed to
keep the property reasonably safe for use by the visitor.
Not exact matches
Justice Hassan held, «I am in complete agreement with the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant (EFCC) that the
property sought to be attached are
reasonably suspected to be proceeds of unlawful activities and that by every standard this huge sum of money is not expected to be
kept without going through a designated financial institution; more so, nobody has shown cause why the said sum should not be forfeited to the Federal Government of Nigeria.
Moreover, the home owner retains the title of the
property throughout the life of the loan, as long as the taxes and insurance associated with the
property are
kept current and the condition of the home is
reasonably maintained.
If he finds such a weapon or instrument, or any other
property possession of which he
reasonably believes may constitute the commission of a crime, he may take it and
keep it until the completion of the questioning, at which time he shall either return it, if lawfully possessed, or arrest such person.
The
property owner must fix or warn visitors of any conditions or aspects of the
property that may be hazardous and must
keep the
property in a
reasonably safe condition.
Premises liability is the legal term for the responsibility of a
property owner to
keep buildings and land
reasonably free of hazards that could injure others.
Property owners in Tennessee and neighboring states have an obligation to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition so that people who enter the property lawfully are not exposed to unreasonabl
Property owners in Tennessee and neighboring states have an obligation to
keep their premises in a
reasonably safe condition so that people who enter the
property lawfully are not exposed to unreasonabl
property lawfully are not exposed to unreasonable risks.
The owner of the gas station
property, or the owner or operator of the business if the building and / or land are leased, have a duty to
keep the gas station premises
reasonably safe.
Massachusetts
property owners and operators are responsible for
keeping residences and businesses of every size in
reasonably safe condition to prevent visitor injuries.
Property owners have a responsibility to
keep their
properties in
reasonably safe condition; when they fail to do so and an accident occurs, they should be held liable for damages.
The landowner,
property manager, landlord, tenant, occupant, etc. breached their legal duty to the injured party (typically by failing to
keep the premises
reasonably safe and / or to warn of any known dangerous conditions on the
property, or failing to investigate the potential for dangerous conditions in a commercial setting)
The landowner,
property manager, landlord, tenant, occupant, etc. owed a legal duty to the injured party (typically, a duty to
keep the premises
reasonably safe and / or to warn of any known dangerous conditions on the
property, as well as a duty to investigate the potential for dangerous conditions in a commercial setting)
In California,
property owners owe a duty of care to
keep their
properties in
reasonably safe conditions for people who might come onto them.
For invited guests to the home, the owner of
property has a duty similar to that of someone entering a business, including
keeping the
property in a
reasonably safe condition or warning of potential dangers.
In Lincoln, all
property owners have a duty to
keep their premises in a
reasonably safe condition and to maintain their
property, so as not to pose any unreasonable hazards to visitors.
In Ontario, the Occupiers Liability Act governs this area of law and places a duty on
property owners (homeowners, business owners, tenants) to
keep their premises in a
reasonably safe condition to prevent injury of visitors, for appropriate steps to be taken to correct any hazardous conditions and to warn persons of any hazards on the
property.
I'm primarily interested in purchasing single - family homes in my area to use as rental
properties, at least to get started, primarily because I'm
reasonably handy (which should help to
keep costs down), and because that seems like a fairly simple way to get started.