Caught between summarizing scientific knowledge and offering political interpretations of such knowledge, the six
key messages seem rather ambivalent in what they are saying.
The key message seems to be: Don't make a fuss.
Not exact matches
The organization
seemed to advance the
message that exercise was a
key and underappreciated factor driving obesity.
I also say that
seems to be the case because Rasmus barley mentions the multiple
key take away
messages contained in the SWIPA Summary eg http://www.amap.no/documents/download/2888
It therefore
seems problematic to me when such lively, well - informed and yet largely unresolved debates among a substantial cohort of the world's climate change researchers gets reduced to six
key messages,
messages that on the one hand carry the aura of urgency, precision and scientific authority — «there is no excuse for inaction» — and yet at the same time remain so imprecise as to resolve nothing in political terms.
But to hang the
key message of the press release that framed media coverage of the report on something so far - fetched, and thus to
seem to endorse it, was undoubtedly a grave error.
Meanwhile, the
key message from the conference that
seems to be spreading around in wingnut circles is this: