The two
key priorities for improvement in Maths across school were: raising the quality of teaching and learning by all staff involved in teaching Maths and ensuring consistency and accuracy of assessments within Maths across the school in light of the 2014 National Curriculum.
Not exact matches
This brief focuses on three
key topics
for early learning in ESSA: setting clear goals and policy
priorities for early learning, integrating early learning into school
improvement, and supporting early childhood educator development.
When British inspectors, who report directly to Parliament and provide their findings «without fear or favor,» identify a school needing
improvement, they generate a letter to school administrators detailing strengths and weaknesses in
key areas like leadership and classroom teaching, along with a list of high -
priority recommendations
for resolving problems.
It focuses on three
key topics
for early learning in ESSA: setting clear goals and policy
priorities for early learning, integrating early learning into school
improvement, and supporting early childhood educator development.
As the clock ticks down
for priority schools that have received a federal School
Improvement Grant, the emerging question has been sustainability, with family - community partnerships surfacing as the
key component needed to continue the reform work in
priority schools.
Parental and community engagement are
key goals
for NEA
Priority Schools Campaign, a multi-year effort to bring permanent transformation and
improvement to America's lower - performing
priority schools.
The headteacher, Maureen Andrews, established this initiative as a
key school
improvement priority and created the time, resources, and initial vision
for the effort.
The review focuses on three
key priorities for early learning in ESSA: 1) Setting clear goals and policy
priorities for early learning; 2) Integrating early learning into school
improvement; and, 3) Supporting early childhood educator development.
The thoughtful, detailed analysis and judgment of the proposed move by the federal government to create a national securities regulator shows how little
improvement there really is likely to be
for the individual investor in solving
key problems: high fees
for mutual funds, costly access to government of Canada securities, lack of fiduciary responsibility by the industry towards investors, inadequate civil court recourse against misbehaving financial firms,
priority given to financial system protection over investor interests.