Not exact matches
Encouragement should be given for
representatives from other relevant
bodies to be involved such as; district councils, the Highways Agency, Network Rail, local Chambers of Commerce and other
key transport groups.
Key members from each AfterZone coordinating council serve as
representatives for the overseeing
body, the citywide coordinating council.
The district compared the new councils with legislative
bodies in
representative democracies and defined two basic jobs for them: 1) developing «powerful partnerships» between the school and the community, and 2) setting policy in «
key operational areas» for individual schools.
Mr Davidson says an independent trust should be formed to spearhead the project and draw together governments, environmental
bodies, legal
representatives and other
key influencers.
I have long believed, certainly before we spoke so much about «communities», that if a professional publisher is to achieve its best, by all the relevant measures, it has to engage closely, intimately, regularly and consistently with the
key member institutes, associations, societies and
representative bodies in the market.
As the
representative body for the Bar, we have been working to identify the
key legal issues which we believe need to be addressed by the Executive and the Legislature to facilitate a transition that minimises the risk of legal uncertainty, the loss of rights, and possible adverse consequences to the national economy, and that capitalises on the opportunities for post-Brexit global Britain.
Participants were divided into groups to discuss and decide what they think is negotiable and not negotiable in relation to
key features and functions of a National
Representative Body.
Due to the abolition of ATSIC there was not an opportunity at the time to consider the usefulness of these principles assisting to define the
key features of a new National Indigenous
Representative Body.
Tables / workshops to consider draft outcomes of day one and two re
key elements of national
representative body, and make any additional suggestions / comments for inclusion in workshop outcomes document
Advocating an Indigenous perspective on issues is a
key function of all national Indigenous
representative bodies.
At the outset it should be acknowledged that the intention here is to identify those
key issues that relate to creating a sustainable basis for a new National Indigenous
Representative Body.
Firstly, there has been a recurrent failure to adequately define the
key relationships between governments, the
representative body and other stakeholders in Indigenous affairs.
Some of the
key issues identified as being needed to be addressed in formulating a new National Indigenous
Representative Body include:
We anticipate that one of the
key benefits of the new National
Representative Body will be to provide a space where the sectoral or regionally specific expertise and knowledge, of existing organisations, can be harnessed for the greater good of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples at the national level.
Understanding the factors that have been in play in past Indigenous
representative bodies, in State / Territory and regional
representative bodies and in Indigenous
representative bodies overseas highlights what are some of the
key issues that should be taken into account when considering possible forms for such a
body.
Rather, the intention is to assist in creating dialogue among Indigenous peoples and government about the
key principles and features for a new National Indigenous
Representative Body that draws on the experiences and lessons of other
bodies to date.
A
key lesson that came out of examining these different
bodies was that a new National Indigenous
Representative Body will need to consider how it relates to each of these existing
bodies.
To this end, in 2007 I initiated research to identify the
key considerations that will need to be addressed in establishing a new National Indigenous
Representative Body.
However, there are some
key and recurring factors as to why
representative bodies have not been sustainable and have been hampered in their effective operation — often despite major investments by individuals, groups and Boards.
Models — how design a national
representative body that contains all the
key elements identified in day 1 and 2
Before considering the
key features of a National Indigenous
Representative Body, it is important to consider what principles should guide a repres
Representative Body, it is important to consider what principles should guide a representative b
Body, it is important to consider what principles should guide a
representativerepresentative bodybody.
In 3 days, the workshop participants have made significant progress in identifying the principles to guide the creation of a new national
representative body for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and in identifying its
key roles and functions, representativeness and relationship to government.
To this end, some of you may have heard that my office has initiated research to identify the
key considerations that will need to be addressed in establishing a national Indigenous
representative body.
Two
key issues to consider about the structure of the new National Indigenous
Representative Body are:
As well as being responsible for formulating, administering and monitoring the effectiveness of programs to individuals, councils and community organisations in
key development areas (such as economic, employment and training, housing and environmental, social and cultural, policy co-ordination), the TSRA is the regional
representative body for native title and land and sea management.
The workshop was structured according to the sets of issues outlined in the issues paper released by the Social Justice Commissioner in July 2008 and titled Building a sustainable National Indigenous
Representative Body —
Key issues.
Its aim is simply to identify some of the
key issues that need to be considered in establishing a new National Indigenous
Representative Body: its guiding principles, role and functions, structure, relationship with government and funding arrangements.
Drawing on the lessons from the past, there are some
key and recurring factors as to why
representative bodies have not been sustainable and have been hampered in their effective operation.
First, there has been a failure to adequately define the
key relationships between governments, the
representative body and other stakeholders in Indigenous affairs.
During Morning Tea: online survey / polling of all participants on
key elements / features of a national
representative body
The 2014 Federal Budget measures to the wider community as well as discontinuation of funding to
key Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander
representative bodies creates significant barriers to improving the significant gap of quality of life between indigenous and no n - indigenous Australians.
The government then announced consultations with Indigenous peoples on the
key issues for a new national
representative body.
The paper also raises some
key issues to consider to ensure that a new National Indigenous
Representative Body is effective and sustainable.
identify the
key elements or features of a new national Indigenous
representative body which can then be distilled down to a series of preferred models for a new
representative body, and
recognise the
key roles that native title Prescribed
Bodies Corporate (PBCs), Native Title
Representative Bodies and Service Providers (NTRB / SPs), the National Native Title Council and locally based, Indigenous - led specialist cultural and economic development organisations play in driving and supporting economic development on the Indigenous Estate; and
Such options could include using
representative bodies to allow women to speak under a collective banner, ensuring women hold
key positions in the community, using male / female teams to work with the community and establishing parallel structures for men and women.
By utilising the existing land holding governance structures, whether they be native title
representative bodies or land councils and land trusts, governments have an opportunity to work in partnership with Indigenous Australians to address some of their
key policy objectives.
Feedback throughout the consultations identified the most important task for the National
Representative Body at the outset being to establish and foster
key relationships, particularly across peak
bodies, governments, regions and the private sector.
The NSW Aboriginal Land Council and the Aboriginal Housing Office, with the support of the DAA initiated a meeting in October 2008 for the purpose of providing an opportunity for NSW Peak
Bodies to explore the potential for reaching a unified NSW position on some
key issues and characteristics of a National
Representative Body.
This will form the
key basis for the National
Representative Body becoming self - sustaining over time.
We anticipate that one of the
key benefits of the new National
Representative Body will be to provide a space where the existing sectoral or regionally specific expertise and knowledge of existing organisations can be harnessed for the greater good of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples at the national level.
Some of the
key findings that are of relevance to the National
Representative Body are as follows.
The following
key guiding principles were also identified for the national
representative body:
In March, the Steering Committee convened a national workshop in Adelaide to identify the
key elements of a new national
representative body.
Most participants also want to develop approaches which have the National
Representative Body represented in
key decision making forums not just making proposals.
Social inclusion was also highlighted as a
key principle with the
representative body playing a vital role in the education of the broader Australian community and working for the benefit of all Australians towards Reconciliation.
And a
key feature of this relationship will be the National
Representative Body holding Government accountable for their obligations to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as citizens.