Sentences with phrase «key safety considerations»

Re-familiarizing yourself with the key safety considerations and continuing to practice your diving skills can only benefit your experience, especially if you haven't been diving for a while.

Not exact matches

Google stressed that safety was a key consideration in its own design.

In most places in Canada, a woman has options when it comes to birth location, and safety is a key consideration for pregnant women and health - care professionals.

A key recommendation, Clark says, is for «the FDA to move beyond its standard matrix of considerations for drug safety and — at least for opioids — move into a more public health — centered matrix of considerations which could help us predict what might happen for people beyond the intended recipient of the drug.»

Deploying adequate solutions to ensure the safety of students and staff and maintaining the security of the school building when not in use must be key considerations in security planning, says Liam Collins of the British Security Industry Association.

«Safety is a key consideration for everyday consumers and corporations with a significant proportion of businesses requiring minimum 5 star vehicle standards for not only their own fleets but also their contractors.

Other safety features to take into consideration are childproof rear door locks and the increasingly popular remote key control entry system.

In fact, the tubs themselves should be a salon's first safety consideration, with quality being the key.

A key message, which was relevant for all organizations, came from Golden: «health, safety, and welfare (HSW) comes above all other considerations.»

A key consideration in determining whether an accommodative measure would amount to undue hardship is occupational health and safety.

The motion judge made several key findings of fact: (i) there was no evidence the appellant's fall was caused by any defect in or lack of repair affecting the premises or any hazardous conditions associated with the premises themselves; (ii) there was no dispute the appellant was performing the renovation work for valuable consideration; (iii) there was no basis for a contractual claim that the respondents had failed to furnish the appellant with safety equipment; (iv) there was no evidence the appellant was inexperienced in performing roofing work or working at heights; and (v) the evidence did not support a finding that the respondents were aware the appellant lacked the necessary experience to carry out the project.