I am a parent of three — two
kids attend public charter schools, and one attends a traditional public school.
Not exact matches
By increasing the number of gifted and talented programs in our neighborhoods and increasing the number of
public charter school seats to 200,000 citywide, we can give thousands more
kids in the Bronx the chance to participate in a program or
attend a
school that could change their lives.
William is worth just as much as Deputy Mayor Buery's son, and so are all of the
kids who are still waiting to
attend public charter schools.
We have all endured a million speeches along the lines of «
charter schools [or vouchers] are well and good for the
kids who
attend them but they» re no solution to the problems of
public school systems that will forever be
attended by the overwhelming majority of
kids.»
For
kids with disabilities, 16 percent of those
attending charter schools were proficient in reading, compared with 10 percent of
public -
school students.
For example, I read about a district in San Diego that was losing $ 65.9 M per year to
charter schools because the
kids are signing up and
attending local
charter public schools.
They never get around to explaining why, in California, 52 percent of students
attending charters that serve a majority of high poverty
kids are in the top quartile of all
public schools statewide as opposed to just 26 percent of similar students
attending traditional
public schools.
Are there differences between the
kids who go to
charters, and those who
attend public schools in New York?
Our state is a leader in funding private
school vouchers and
charter schools with taxpayer money to the detriment of the more than 90 percent of Hoosier
kids attending public schools.»
In 2015 he wrote, «financially unable to move to a town like Maplewood or
attend a private
school, getting into a Newark
public charter school was the only option to ensure that my
kids received the education they deserve.»)
Yes on 2, despite outspending the «no» camp 2 - 1 couldn't find a message that worked, and was never able to counter the single argument that most resonated with voters against
charter schools: they take money away from
public schools and the
kids who
attend them.
Furthermore, it makes no sense to defund
public schools, which 85 - 90 % of
kids attend, for the benefit of the 5 percent that
attend charters, when only a handful perform better than
public schools, while most do the same — or worse.
At least the usual opponents of
charters tacitly acknowledge that
charters are helping the
kids that
attend them, just not ALL
public school children.