Sentences with phrase «kill a human being if»

Not exact matches

Its a WAKE UP CALL to all the human beings of the world but Muslims, these r the people who r responisible for killing of innocents all over the world, Americans have to understand that ISLAM does not have the concept of co-existenc this is the words of Jinnah, if they are not stopped then the days are not far behind when US and European countries will have Kashmirs where Muslims out numbered the Natives and now dominate the place.

If your god's «judgment» is to kill, how is that any different than a flawed human?

it tells me if i kill one soul for no reason, its like killing all human beings.

If they would think of them selves as humans first they may be able to hold off on killing for god.

So if those human beings feel that flying airplanes in to buildings, or torturing other humans, or killing their unborn children is right, they can.

If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that were other than ending abortion rights or killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like humans we would already be well into recovery.

On the contrary, if certain human beings build and use military drones that «make their own kill decisions,» these human beings will be morally and legally responsible for the results.

If a person needs the fear of eternal punishment by a make believe god to deter them from killing, stealing or any other sort of malevolence, they are not decent human beings to begin with.

, then Job can ask — and indeed if he is human he must ask — «Where were you, O God, on that day when all my herds were taken and all my servants and even all my children were killed?

Only 10 % of the cells in and on your body are human, the other 90 % is the trillions of life forms that inhabit and live on your body... some of them can kill you if they get too numerous.

No individuals who live in civil societies require weapons designed to hunt and kill other human beings... even if the target is a Christian evangelical (but then again).

Sean, if we look at what is happening in Africa these days, I'm to believe that killing off all the «extra» humans seems to be the plan of some.

If God killed / will kill (per your bible) many humans / gays, isn't THAT more of a SIN than being «created» human / gay by that same God?

If overpopulation were a fact, that would hardly justify killing humans.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

If it is permissible to kill the unborn human for convenience, it is surely permissible to kill those thought to be soon to die for the same reason.

The «right» to die actually means, if we're brutally honest, that some people are seeking the legal «right» to kill another human being.

So you don't believe that all humans are born sinful meriting eternal punishment or maybe they are, but the god will excuse their sinful nature if he kills them when they are very young?

So, in your understanding, if an entity (Ie God) is loving, then that means (in your opinion) that it's impossible that they would ever, under any circumstances, kill a human?

If what you interpret Paul as saying is that before creating all the myriad galaxies and star systems God decided that They would put some humans on the third planet from an insignificant star on a little arm of a middling galaxy and that the first hominids chosen role would be to perform pretty much to spec and do something silly and rebellious (arguably without sufficient information as to consequences for themselves and their off spring, oh, and for serpents) and cause affront to the tripartite godhead warranting separation of Gods grace from all their offspring; then we are left with people being chosen from way back before the Big Bang to do some terrible things like killing babies or betraying Jesus who was chosen on the same non date (time didn't exist before creation) to die in a fairly nasty fashion and thereby appease the righteous wrath of himself and his fellow Trinitarians by paying a penalty as a substitute for all future sins (of believers?)

In the day of Exodus the verse says he will not be punished (killed for taking a human life) if he lives because he is his property.

To kill for food was a natural and normal part of life — even if it meant killing other human beings.

If a blacksmith makes a knife to cut vegetables, but someone else uses it to kill humans, it is not the knife's fault, the blacksmith's fault for making the knife, or even God's fault for making the blacksmith.

When most of the interviewees admit that it is indeed a baby, they are asked to finish the following sentence: «It's okay to kill a baby in the womb when...» Various responses follow: «That's very hard to say...»; «It should never be done lightly...»; «If the mothercannot provide for the baby...»; «If the mother was raped...» The questioner presses the issue: «When asked about the Holocaust, you said that you valued human life, so why is this situation any different?»

By this logic they can say that if only one or two of us are killed it will present no threat to the human species, so why not?

It is alleged that if humans would stop killing animals the earth would become a better place to live.

But even if religion were to fade away, humans would just come up with another reason to kill each other.

If only one of those over 1,000 prisoners, kill just one Israeli or other human being then the justification for this swap goes out the window.

if the jews are killing and they are not human so how do u explain thet gilad shalit was in prison for more then five years and no body were allowed to see him while the these stinking terrorists are still alive and get every human rights (Although they do nt deserve it)

Al - Maeda sura 05: In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful For that cause We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind.

I wondered when we would know better how to help children more widely in schools and homes to understand their feelings, and when we would be able to help parents understand theirs, so that the boys and girls now growing up might know not only about tanks and bullets but about the most powerful of all weapons for both good and evil — the human feelings that propel us, if we do not understand them, into hating in place of loving, into killing instead of creation.

It really shouldn't be necessary to even have laws regarding such matters, but then again, it shouldn't be necessary to have laws that say you can't up and kill somebody you are angry with, but it is necessary and human behaviour does need to be regulated if we are to be able to live together in any sense of civility.

Just so for pro-lifers, who find dignity in every human individual: To say that killing such a prized being doesn't count if he or she is still developing in the womb strikes them as outrageously absurd.

And who ever out of those fights for his land and freedom is called terrorist and killed like a dog or thrown out of land if not in mass jails for future exchange against Israeli soldiers... what a life what a freedom, what a human rights, what united nations what all the camouflage we are surrounded with in this unreal world.

NOT HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS, BUT ORGANIZERS OF GENOCIDE AGAINST WHITES AND SPONSORS OF BOGUS «MULTICULTURALISM» $ $ $ CLAIMS AT EXPENSE OF PERSECUTED WHITES (while minorities are awarded for and instructed by governments in bogus human rights claims, whites are simply killed if not perverted in multiculturalism garbagHUMAN RIGHTS COURTS, BUT ORGANIZERS OF GENOCIDE AGAINST WHITES AND SPONSORS OF BOGUS «MULTICULTURALISM» $ $ $ CLAIMS AT EXPENSE OF PERSECUTED WHITES (while minorities are awarded for and instructed by governments in bogus human rights claims, whites are simply killed if not perverted in multiculturalism garbaghuman rights claims, whites are simply killed if not perverted in multiculturalism garbage)!!!

If the unborn child is a living human being, then abortion is nothing less than the killing of an innocent life.

Free will, even if humans have it, is not responsible for earthquakes, tsunamis, Hurricanes, pathogens etc., that kill and cause suffering for thousands.

If King's conception of the Deity or deities that inhabit our solar system is that possessed by a primitive tribe of hunter - gatherers or by one of the earliest of civilizations, one of half - human gods (chimeras) or monsters, little concerned with the fate of humanity, both capricious and threatening («As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods; they kill us for their sport»), that is interesting from an anthropological perspective, but what does it have to do with «first things»?

If your beliefs were right, then why did things keep happening after we humans killed jesus.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the tsunami that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

If you of someone like that get them some mental help, before they kill an innocent human being.

I'm pretty sure they'd do some of the things we do if they ruled the world it's natural you dumb monkey bitch... I'll tell you what since you think animals are better why don't you stop using technology of any sort tv, car, phone, computer, please oh please traffic lights run around in the wild don't even eat human prepared food just go out and eat leaves and shit off the trees go to the jungle I guarantee you these animals would kill you at some point then at least at the end of the day you would know you did the world a favor....

This first human was born into the Law of the Jungle and this first human had to survive within it if he ever hoped to do anything more than Kill and Live; Don't and Die.

«If you look at the police brutality and the killings, and you look at the massive unemployment and poverty and wealth and income inequality... We need radical and effective leadership that's going to prioritize people over the party, that's going to prioritize human need over human greed.»

Just a thought experiment (covering the missing human part): If you were a sub commander in charge of ICBMs and you learned your country was destroyed, and took the time to verify (days perhaps because you have no communication) and you are somewhat certain but not perfectly certain as to who did the attack, and your state no longer supports life, and your head of state is gone, do you fire your weapons killing millions of innocent people?

Even if you come today and start a church you name «Kill Every Human Being Church», some people will still join you.

If these human - killing instruments are going to available to almost anyone, shouldn't there be common sense regulation?

«If you have an overwash event, all of a sudden, you're salinating that fresh water; you basically kill the agriculture due to salt loading, and if you get [salt concentrations] over a few parts per thousand, it's no longer fit for human consumption,» said Curt Storlazzi, a research oceanographer at the USGS Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center and lead author of the studIf you have an overwash event, all of a sudden, you're salinating that fresh water; you basically kill the agriculture due to salt loading, and if you get [salt concentrations] over a few parts per thousand, it's no longer fit for human consumption,» said Curt Storlazzi, a research oceanographer at the USGS Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center and lead author of the studif you get [salt concentrations] over a few parts per thousand, it's no longer fit for human consumption,» said Curt Storlazzi, a research oceanographer at the USGS Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center and lead author of the study.

He wondered if human head lice could also be killed by drying them out.

If animal tests go well, the next trials will be with humans, a process that involves three stages — one for safety, the next to see if the protein kills cancer in a limited number of people, and the last to turn it loose in a large grouIf animal tests go well, the next trials will be with humans, a process that involves three stages — one for safety, the next to see if the protein kills cancer in a limited number of people, and the last to turn it loose in a large grouif the protein kills cancer in a limited number of people, and the last to turn it loose in a large group.