Sentences with phrase «kill a human does»

Not exact matches

«They do nothing but kill, and kill humans in the millions.»

First, people often kill other human beings because they believe that the creator of the universe wants them to do it... Second, far greater numbers of people fall into conflict with one another because they define their moral com.munity on the basis of their religious affiliation...»

Did the godless communists like Stalin an Mao kill a larger percentage of the human population than the Christian crusaders?

Its a WAKE UP CALL to all the human beings of the world but Muslims, these r the people who r responisible for killing of innocents all over the world, Americans have to understand that ISLAM does not have the concept of co-existenc this is the words of Jinnah, if they are not stopped then the days are not far behind when US and European countries will have Kashmirs where Muslims out numbered the Natives and now dominate the place.

William just thinks that we should just kill everyone who doesn't agree with him and then the world will be perfect, because he is the greatest human being alive.

That did not happen: there is no geological record of a world - wide flood, there is not enough diversity to regenerate the population we currently, there is not enough water to cover the earth to the height of Everest, the logistics of retrieving and returning animals to the then - unknown Americas, Australia, etc. were staggeringly difficult, managing the animals on the Ark was impossible — a few humans keeping predators from their prey, cleaning the waste, etc., pretty much all life on earth would have been killed, etc. etc..

The law says we can kill and eat animals as long as it's done in a safe and humane way, it also says a fertilized egg isn't a human until it reaches 24 weeks.

The Holocaust was not all about the Jews, it was about Nazi Germany's attempt to kill off ALL who did not comply with their standards of a human being.

Why kill everyone if he knew that after killing them, man would do the same thing again which would then make him send himself as his son to die for this new humans?

God does not need to become human and kill himself for the sins of man.

God does intervene sometimes to stop the baby from being killed, but frequently works through humans to advance the cause of right.

While it also doesn't necessarily kill, it does damage to the human body as a social creature.

Christians do not believe in the «human»; we believe in God — a God we believe, moreover, who intends to kill us all in the end.

So we Christians do not oppose nuclear weapons because they threaten to destroy «mother earth,» but because the God we serve would not have one life unjustly taken even if such a killing would insure the survival of the human species.

It doesn't have any direct effect on the human system other than the negative aspect of getting appendicitis and killing you.

Did they kill the women and boys because of the known $ exual immorality and associated disease that riddled these tribes that offered their children as human sacrifice and $ ex toys?

If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that were other than ending abortion rights or killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like humans we would already be well into recovery.

they have no respect for human life.They do have an agenda, and killing is what it is.

«I think when Cain killed Abel, it showed that much death and misery was to be done by humans killing humans.

The term «kill» is loaded because you wouldn't call it «killing» when a guy doesn't protect every single sperm — yet, it is destruction of human life.

So the politician who votes in favour of abortion really does formally co-operate in a very serious ethical offence: the killing of innocent human beings who are part of our human family.

While we do not have anything like a final, scientific approach to maximizing human happiness, it seems safe to say that rap.ing and killing children will not be one of its primary consti.tuents.

As for what I apparantly do nt get, the thing I do nt get is how someone could kill a human life on purpose, as you said conception is the continuation of humans.

Where in Genesis does it tell who created the parallel civilization of Nod where the first human baby created by God (who killed the second human baby) went?

A pure human invention used to dominate and kill others that don't think or believe like us.

Besides the fact that blasphemy laws are abusive tools of oppression, besides totalitarian religious states being unused to freedom of speech, besides the differences between Islam and Christianity... Putting all that aside, how does one human being rejoice that another is going to be killed?

We humans seem have a fascination with war, battle, bloodshed, violence and killing our enemies, don't we?

Does this new finding prove an invisible, all powerful, magic man who lives in the sky had an evil talking snake tempt a woman, made from a rib, to disobey him, whereby he put a curse on all future humanity, then later changed his mind and decides to lift his curse by impregnating a human woman with himself and having himself tortured, killed, and raised from the dead, so that if you believe all that, you get to live forever in heaven after you die, but if you don't, he will torture you forever in hell?

to show this, i would like to have any human who believes that hitler was doing «gods work» to come over and let me give them a acid shower, or just not feed them, or maybe kill all the people they know in front of them and them not feed them.

Human sacrifice: a burning bush tell Abraham to kill his son (of course, only at the last second does God say «naaaaah, just kidding»)

And don't claim aything about this «humans as the higher standard, rule over the animal kingdom» B.S. People kill much more indescriminently than any animal ever did.

Its funny that you want to take my right as a human to defend myself with as much firepower as possible but you do nt want to «trample» the rights of women by not allowing them to have abortions which kill over a million children per year.

Religion however has tried to supersede our humanity and tell us it's okay to kill those other humans because they aren't like you, they don't worship the same God as you, they don't have the same hope for an afterlife, they aren't special and «chosen» by God like you... that is the true face of evil on the planet, the one that tries to make you forget your humanity with bribes and extortion.

I just wonder why they are not fighting just as hard against other forms of «killing humans» like the death penalty (no one can say no innocent people have died on death row) the poor and sick and many elderly being allowed to starve and freeze because the religious right doesn't want to shoulder that burden through their taxes.

(native americans) Humans killed them off pretty well... people don't complain.

The pro-abortion group does agree; killing an innocent human being is wrong.

Pro-abortion people do not disagree that killing an innocent human is bad.

God does not act like an Oriental potentate who enjoys humans, like puppies, tumbling before his throne until it suits a divine whim to have them killed.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

It is not good enough merely to refrain from killing your enemy; you must love him too: «Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who treat you badly» (Lk 6, 27 - 28) Jesus» words seem a divine madness and entirely contrary to human nature.

On what other great question of human rights, in this case the most fundamental right, which is the right to be protected from willful killing, does Cafardi say «the battle is over - permanently»?

So you don't believe that all humans are born sinful meriting eternal punishment or maybe they are, but the god will excuse their sinful nature if he kills them when they are very young?

People invent all sorts of reasons to do others harm, they have to because if just left with basic empathy and compassion no one would think it right to kill another human if they can put themselves in that other humans shoes.

People do not need the God of Abraham to live a moral life, no more than the millions of religious zealots who use their interpretation of religious dogma to dominate, subjugate and kill other human beings.

We must deny that the act is deliberate, deny that it kills, deny that its victims are human, or deny that wrong must not be done.

A belief system which blames all of the human sins on your kind... it labels women as property... tells women they should be silent and tells men that do what they wish to you including killing you.

So far, all you've shown is that religious belief or lack thereof is no indicator of morality since atheists and believers both do really human stuff like killing and such..

If what you interpret Paul as saying is that before creating all the myriad galaxies and star systems God decided that They would put some humans on the third planet from an insignificant star on a little arm of a middling galaxy and that the first hominids chosen role would be to perform pretty much to spec and do something silly and rebellious (arguably without sufficient information as to consequences for themselves and their off spring, oh, and for serpents) and cause affront to the tripartite godhead warranting separation of Gods grace from all their offspring; then we are left with people being chosen from way back before the Big Bang to do some terrible things like killing babies or betraying Jesus who was chosen on the same non date (time didn't exist before creation) to die in a fairly nasty fashion and thereby appease the righteous wrath of himself and his fellow Trinitarians by paying a penalty as a substitute for all future sins (of believers?)

Even if one gets to blame Satan for all that, Satan didn't even come close to killing almost every human on earth the way god excelled at.

And we've got a filicidal personality who purposely chooses to kill his / her own child, ostensibly as the propitiation for what human beings (whom God created in the first place, mind you) do as a result of being human.