Rabies, in particular, is a serious illness that can
kill humans as well as animals.
Not exact matches
An ever growing pile of studies shows that a lack of face to face time with your fellow
human beings will
kill you
as surely
as fast food or cigarettes.
That was true since automobiles transformed our lifestyles while simultaneously
killing thousands a day, and it's true in our current reality of mind - bending technological progress with entrepreneurs aiming rockets at Mars and envisioning artificial intelligence that makes
humans look about
as smart a house cat in comparison.
«Horrific mass
killings receive the most media attention, but
as can be seen by the numbers, they only represent a small portion of the total costs -
human and medical - of gun injuries in the United States,» said David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center in Boston, who was not involved with the study.
Killing a cat or dog for
human consumption could carry a year in prison and
as much
as a $ 2,500 fine in the U.S., if the House farm bill becomes law.
First, he would have to have existed, then be reborn
as a
human, then
killed as a
human to pay some ransom price he set on our heads for the sin of eating his fruit from the tree he happened to plant right next to the hungry
humans he just made.
The law says we can
kill and eat animals
as long
as it's done in a safe and humane way, it also says a fertilized egg isn't a
human until it reaches 24 weeks.
It is not for me to interpret God's word
as carte blanche to
kill other
human beings.
Why
kill everyone if he knew that after
killing them, man would do the same thing again which would then make him send himself
as his son to die for this new
humans?
If they would think of them selves
as humans first they may be able to hold off on
killing for god.
As humans created in the image of God we are capable of divine expression even in our pitiful fallen state; even the soldiers in World War 1 had a brief respite on Christmas and walked out of the trenches to greet each other only to return to the trenches the next day and resume
killing each other.
From a
human point of view it seems ridiculous that a
human being could torture, maim, and
kill others relentlessly during her lifetime or that he could sexually abuse child after child with no remorse and then upon a sincere deathbed confession of Jesus Christ
as Savior, be granted eternal life, no questions asked.
While it also doesn't necessarily
kill, it does damage to the
human body
as a social creature.
It seems to me they have much bigger fish to fry like: The Taliban treating women
as less than
human, stoning people to death, 60 year old men marrying teenage girls, cutting off an 18 year old girl's nose because she left her abusive husband (see TIME magazine a month ago), destroying over 125 schools because girls attend, suicidal Islamic fanatical cowards on every continent
killing thousands of INNOCENT people, and these clowns are worried about their precious Koran being burned by a nutjob.
Did they
kill the women and boys because of the known $ exual immorality and associated disease that riddled these tribes that offered their children
as human sacrifice and $ ex toys?
People burned
as witches, blacks lynched by Christians in this county, people
killed in
human sacrifices, servants
killed to accompany pharaohs on their journeys to the afterlife, untold numbers of people
killed in various cultures because they were deemed to have offended God in some way, and so on.
I believe that
human actors who fail to give pride of place to moral boundaries that must never be crossed, such
as the direct
killing of the innocent, and who instead are ready to see their obligations in terms of moving beyond them in favor of «good results,» will be harder put «to take seriously the role that divine authority plays in morality»; for they will to that extent lose a sense of the moral limits that remind us of our finitude and anticipate consideration of a law of our being that is not one of our making.
As is well known,
human soldiers make mistakes distinguishing between combatants and non-combatants and thus sometimes
kill the innocent.
The Syrian Observatory for
Human Rights and Kurdish officials say more than 40 of the ISIS fighters were
killed as Kurdish forces reclaimed the city over the weekend.
Christians and
human rights groups protested the
killings in major cities
as Christian schools nationwide closed for three days in symbolic protest.
In deciding what food can be eaten and what is forbidden Muslim jurisprudence accepts
as guides the Qur» an, the Hadith, what the Prophet ordered to be
killed and what he forbade
killing, and the foods which are abhorrent to
human feeling.
wants to
kill all the
human and they never win
as from the beginnin» until the end only the ordinary men
as well
as their families and they be called the Lamb of God» s children will carry on.
A civilization can not tolerate private executions,
as a civilization can not long survive the license to
kill unwanted
human beings.
As for what I apparantly do nt get, the thing I do nt get is how someone could kill a human life on purpose, as you said conception is the continuation of human
As for what I apparantly do nt get, the thing I do nt get is how someone could
kill a
human life on purpose,
as you said conception is the continuation of human
as you said conception is the continuation of
humans.
By saying it is up to the parents then a parent could
kill a 6 month old and just say I diddnt see it
as a child /
human because of various reasons like he is dependant on my income etc...
The same divine law which forbids the
killing of a
human being allows certain exceptions,
as when God authorizes
killing by a general law or when He gives an explicit commission to an individual for a limited time.
On this view,
human freedom extends to absolute mastery over one's life, a mastery which extends to being
killed or assisted in suicide so long
as these are voluntary acts.»
I mean
as just
humans on this planet we have
killed for so many things, love of God or just for the love of money and power.
The United Nations reports that ISIS
killed at least 232 people on Wednesday alone, in addition to using thousands of people
as human shields to defend themselves against the Iraqi militia.
How a
human life could be considered so worthless
as to
kill it rather than allow someone else to care for and love the child is beyond my comprehension.
And don't claim aything about this «
humans as the higher standard, rule over the animal kingdom» B.S. People
kill much more indescriminently than any animal ever did.
Others believe that the
killing of other animals should be viewed in much the same light
as the
killing of
human beings.
Holy schnikees are they real, and really scary
as they have multiple high capacity guns and are just salivating to use them to
kill another
human being just to prove how much they love their jeebus.
Its funny that you want to take my right
as a
human to defend myself with
as much firepower
as possible but you do nt want to «trample» the rights of women by not allowing them to have abortions which
kill over a million children per year.
Religion however has tried to supersede our humanity and tell us it's okay to
kill those other
humans because they aren't like you, they don't worship the same God
as you, they don't have the same hope for an afterlife, they aren't special and «chosen» by God like you... that is the true face of evil on the planet, the one that tries to make you forget your humanity with bribes and extortion.
I just wonder why they are not fighting just
as hard against other forms of «
killing humans» like the death penalty (no one can say no innocent people have died on death row) the poor and sick and many elderly being allowed to starve and freeze because the religious right doesn't want to shoulder that burden through their taxes.
Unfortunately,
as a former Christian, well acquainted with sin and confession and the whole bloody business of sacrifice to appease Someone who thinks that shows «love,» I question the whole ancient story, all the animals
killed, all the trees cut down (for temples and churches and crosses and «holy books») and all the
human beings left to feel separated again and again from the universe, Nature, each other and their «gods.»
As with your thing about
killing animals, the Bible makes it clear that while animals should be treated justly,
Humans rule over the animals.
«Today, Christianity has become the most persecuted religion, where out of five people
killed [for] religious reasons, four of them are Christians,» Catholic News Agency (CNA) quoted Hungary's Minister for
Human Resources, Zoltan Balog,
as saying.
You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and
kill him
as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great
human teacher.
But, what I really am interested in finding out is, of the four men
killed in that compound, which one of them used the woman
as a
human shield.
Adam, to suggest your SUPER inflated numbers (most were
killed due to conditionso f war, including by their own governments failure to to give two squirts of piss about them and using then
as human shields) somehow makes my country's actions in the war on terror equivalent to terrorism itself is beyond offensive to me.
This would be a good image to use on a gun range, where shooters can see the outline of a
human head with no
human features to disturb them
as they practice aiming to
kill.
A belief system which blames all of the
human sins on your kind... it labels women
as property... tells women they should be silent and tells men that do what they wish to you including
killing you.
In the light of man's unrelenting attack on disease, some biologists believe that development of deadly germs is a betrayal of the
human race
as well
as of the ideals of science; one - hundredth of an ounce of botulism toxin could
kill a million people, and its production seems to further neither scientific knowledge nor any peacetime applications.
Until we figure out that the only real truth out there is that we are all equally
human and treat each other
as we would want to be treated
as a fellow
human being, we will continue to stupidly hate and
kill over myths and stories and eventually utterly destroy ourselves over who has the better imaginary friend.
If what you interpret Paul
as saying is that before creating all the myriad galaxies and star systems God decided that They would put some
humans on the third planet from an insignificant star on a little arm of a middling galaxy and that the first hominids chosen role would be to perform pretty much to spec and do something silly and rebellious (arguably without sufficient information
as to consequences for themselves and their off spring, oh, and for serpents) and cause affront to the tripartite godhead warranting separation of Gods grace from all their offspring; then we are left with people being chosen from way back before the Big Bang to do some terrible things like
killing babies or betraying Jesus who was chosen on the same non date (time didn't exist before creation) to die in a fairly nasty fashion and thereby appease the righteous wrath of himself and his fellow Trinitarians by paying a penalty
as a substitute for all future sins (of believers?)
After demanding death for being
human and for behaving in ways that God apparently finds unacceptable, God sends Jesus to be
killed and to serve
as the sacrificial lamb for all of humankind.
And we've got a filicidal personality who purposely chooses to
kill his / her own child, ostensibly
as the propitiation for what
human beings (whom God created in the first place, mind you) do
as a result of being
human.
But Las Casas, citing the binding of Isaac and the
killing of the firstborn, did not flinch from defending
human sacrifice
as a justified religious act.