Sentences with phrase «kill humans so»

But lets face it, most things kill humans so this would be nothing new

Not exact matches

Though the virus rarely kills people, it is «so contagious and causes such violent illness to further spread its progeny that is virtually impossible to eliminate... from a crowded human environment,» writes Garrett.

Experiment either kills or spares processes, so human procedures themselves evolve in a manner similar to the sequences that build complex organs.

So it is god changes the DNA of microbes to become resistant to antibiotics, causing many needless deaths and painful afflictions upon the human race, directs the mud to flow to kill a hundred plus children at a school in Wales..

So we Christians do not oppose nuclear weapons because they threaten to destroy «mother earth,» but because the God we serve would not have one life unjustly taken even if such a killing would insure the survival of the human species.

He would travel back in time to make sure no one killed Jesus so he would end up dying of old age just like eveyone else and humans would never have to look upon another golden glorified crucifix again.

So if those human beings feel that flying airplanes in to buildings, or torturing other humans, or killing their unborn children is right, they can.

People burned as witches, blacks lynched by Christians in this county, people killed in human sacrifices, servants killed to accompany pharaohs on their journeys to the afterlife, untold numbers of people killed in various cultures because they were deemed to have offended God in some way, and so on.

Yet God covers our actions in His own blood, so that every time God looks like a lying, murderous, baby - killing, woman - raping bastard, it is because God has taken the burden of human sin upon His shoulders, and borne it away upon His body into death.

Singer was more responsible than anyone else for making the term «speciesism» known, beginning in 1975 with his highly influential book Animal Liberation and continuing with his widely professed proposal that so - called human non-persons can be killed (infanticide or non-voluntary euthanasia) because of their «lower» moral status.

So the politician who votes in favour of abortion really does formally co-operate in a very serious ethical offence: the killing of innocent human beings who are part of our human family.

God misjudged humans so badly that the very FIRST human baby killed the second human baby.

On this view, human freedom extends to absolute mastery over one's life, a mastery which extends to being killed or assisted in suicide so long as these are voluntary acts.»

I mean as just humans on this planet we have killed for so many things, love of God or just for the love of money and power.

Does this new finding prove an invisible, all powerful, magic man who lives in the sky had an evil talking snake tempt a woman, made from a rib, to disobey him, whereby he put a curse on all future humanity, then later changed his mind and decides to lift his curse by impregnating a human woman with himself and having himself tortured, killed, and raised from the dead, so that if you believe all that, you get to live forever in heaven after you die, but if you don't, he will torture you forever in hell?

How a human life could be considered so worthless as to kill it rather than allow someone else to care for and love the child is beyond my comprehension.

So in your opinion humans can kill other humans actually.

I was making a not so veiled putdown of the average xtian believer who wears his WWJD lapel pin while cleaning his stash of high powered guns hoping to one day use them to kill other human beings.

Would it be ok to randomly kill two humans per year so they could practice it?

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

So you don't believe that all humans are born sinful meriting eternal punishment or maybe they are, but the god will excuse their sinful nature if he kills them when they are very young?

In fact, earth is so perfect for human existence that microorganisms, natural disasters, and extreme weather kill millions.

So, in your understanding, if an entity (Ie God) is loving, then that means (in your opinion) that it's impossible that they would ever, under any circumstances, kill a human?

In fact, some of his greatest arguments with the soldiers / governments over the years have been over this very issue — the humans are afraid and so they want to kill the aliens while he wants to encourage life and cooperation (thinking in particular of the Ninth Doctor with Harriet Jones or even the battle of Canary Wharf when we lost Rose because of Torchwood opening the breach etc.).

So far, all you've shown is that religious belief or lack thereof is no indicator of morality since atheists and believers both do really human stuff like killing and such..

With all of God having been said to order the murder of nations, who drowned an Egyptian army and sent an angel of death to kill children, and so on, it's easy to say that most every religion's gods encourage «action» based on their deities being all too human.

When most of the interviewees admit that it is indeed a baby, they are asked to finish the following sentence: «It's okay to kill a baby in the womb when...» Various responses follow: «That's very hard to say...»; «It should never be done lightly...»; «If the mothercannot provide for the baby...»; «If the mother was raped...» The questioner presses the issue: «When asked about the Holocaust, you said that you valued human life, so why is this situation any different?»

Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.»

By this logic they can say that if only one or two of us are killed it will present no threat to the human species, so why not?

... so you mean that Palestinians are not human... cus last time i checked Jews are killing Palestinians like whatever!

if the jews are killing and they are not human so how do u explain thet gilad shalit was in prison for more then five years and no body were allowed to see him while the these stinking terrorists are still alive and get every human rights (Although they do nt deserve it)

I predict that as atheism rises, so too will infanticide, euthanasia, «mercy killing», and a degredation of human rights

Destroyed means gone forever, so by killing all human death and reviving the spiritual life that isn't destroying nothing but the lost souls who don't have any faith so those in faith will continue on not destroyed but alive.....

I wondered when we would know better how to help children more widely in schools and homes to understand their feelings, and when we would be able to help parents understand theirs, so that the boys and girls now growing up might know not only about tanks and bullets but about the most powerful of all weapons for both good and evil — the human feelings that propel us, if we do not understand them, into hating in place of loving, into killing instead of creation.

Just so for pro-lifers, who find dignity in every human individual: To say that killing such a prized being doesn't count if he or she is still developing in the womb strikes them as outrageously absurd.

And so now abortion constituted homicide, the killing of a human person.

First, since human society always employs violence to enforce some set of standards, Christians» whom Christ called to live out a radically different form of community, one in which it is the crucified rather than his judges who is vindicated as God's Word» should simply take up the burden of civic order and abandon the Gospel where prudentially necessary because, you know, someone absolutely has to kill heretics, and so we should make sure the right heretics get killed.

It's true that it guns don't kill people, people kill people, but only an assault rifle will allow a human to kill SO many innocent victims in such a short time.

He them created a son whom he killed so that he could forgive humans for breaking laws that he made in the first place, Wow, I don't think that sounds like a very nice guy, do you?

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the tsunami that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

Today things have not changed we don't want love as a part of our human life so we kill each other, it's call free will not God's will.

Just as a car is not evil when it kills someone after spinning out of control of the driver, so also, creation is in chaos because the human drivers have lost control.

because it was scientists that created the Nuclear bomb, in fact it was science that created all weapons... so by your logic, Science is to blame for the Death of EVERY human being in Warfare throughout time except for those killed by rocks and sticks that are unsharpened and / or killed by use of barehands... Science has slaughtered BILLIONS...... of course that's nonsense right?

- God came here on earth to help the human race, but we try to kill God, because we did not want Love so we hung Love on a cross and said the hell with God we don't need his Love.

Humans threaten to hurt or kill, and actually do so, mostly to scare, terrorize, and impose their will upon others.

Dairy's dark secret may leave a sour taste in your mouth... Hundreds of thousands of week - old bobby calves are killed as «waste products» of this industry each year — just so humans can drink their mothers» milk.

And for millions of years male animals will kill babies that aren't theirs in order to mate with the mother... so since we want to imitate animals... is this normal behavior for humans also?

The governor, who likened the militarization of Nigeria, being witnessed now to 1984 when President Muhammadu Buhari was military Head of State, said «killing unarmed Nigerians in the Southeast or anywhere in the country, just because some people are agitating is wrong and I wonder why none of our so called human rights activists is talking now.

@pluckedkiwi Of course not, killing a human requires damaging them so much that they can no longer function, no matter what method you use the result may be slow, fast, painful, not painful, etc..

«I hope she gets f... king killed,» wrote another woman, who while apparently comfortable publicly calling for the murder of a fellow human being, felt squeamish about doing so while swearing.