Leviticus explicitly advocates
killing disobedient children, so why should you be surprised at this?
Jesus criticizes the Jews for not
killing their disobedient children according to Old Testament law.
He defends himself by attacking them for not
killing disobedient children according to the commandment: «He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.»
I'd also throw in items such as stoning non-virgins on their wedding night in front of their parents,
killing your disobedient children, can sell your daughter into 7 years of slavery for cash, rules on how badly you can beat your slaves.
Do
you kill your disobedient children?
Like the type of moral guidance that says it's okay to
kill your disobedient children by stoning them to death?
Those who are willing to base their argument permitting abortions entirely on the plurality - of - views doctrine should ask themselves questions like the following: Suppose some people thought it permissible for mothers to
kill their disobedient five - year - olds (cf. Deut.
Is it ok to follow the Bible and
kill your disobedient child, as long as you are an employee of Hobby Lobby?
Not exact matches
it says to
kill g.a.y.s, non-virgin brides and
disobedient children.
the bible also says to
kill non-virgin brides and
disobedient children.
Well, sure, if
killing neighbours who work on Sunday or
disobedient teenagers is moral to you, then go right ahead and believe whatever you want.
when god says to
kill g.a.y.s, non-virgin brides and
disobedient children, what do you think of that?
the bible is very clear about
killing g.ays, non-virgin brides,
disobedient children and anyone that works on the weekend.
The fundamental (excuse the pun) problems with far - right Christianity are exactly the same issues our Savior spoke about to the Pharisees: judgmentalism, hypocrisy, intolerance, and the hyper - extremity of observing the letter of the law rather than its spirit (as evidenced by statements from various preachers that people such gays and
disobedient children should be
killed).
the bible supports slavery throughout, order christians to
kill g.ays,
disobedient children, non-virgin brides and anyone working the weekend.
why is that christians will always tell you that you don't need to follow the old rules of the old testament i.e. stoning
disobedient children, brides who aren't virgins etc yet CONSISTENTLY cite levitacus to justify their opinion that
killing gays is wrong — could someone explain this please.
But as Bill maher once said: «I could believe in the Bible if it would mention one of the following words: electricity, nuclear power, computer, laser and evolution... Instead the god in the OT
kills over 2 million men, women and children for being
disobedient or collecting sticks on a Sabbath.
Why did he advocate slavery with guidelines on how badly you can beat them, or honor
killings of
disobedient children, or the great flood that wiped out all living beings except for a chosen family?
You know, it's your duty to
kill anyone who works on the sabbath and
disobedient children??
true christians
kill g.ays, non-virgin brides,
disobedient children and people that work on the weekend.
the bible supports slavery, the
killing of g.ays, non-virgin brides,
disobedient children and anyone that works on the weekend.
except the scriptures tell you to
kill g.ays,
disobedient children and non-virgin brides.
the bible says it is moral to
kill g.ays,
disobedient children, non-virgin women and anyone working the weekend.
the bible specifically tells it's followers to
kill non-virgin brides, g.ays,
disobedient children, all non-believers and anyone working the weekend.
the difference is, there's no unchanging atheist doctrine commanding us to
kill the religious - the bible very clearly tells christians to
kill non-believers, g.ays, non-virgin brides,
disobedient children and anyone working the weekend.
The daughter was going through her
disobedient stage (at one point, she seems more intent on helping her murderous boyfriend, rather than her father, who her boyfriend is trying to
kill), and Mary Sanders seemed a bit more able to take control of her own life.