Sentences with phrase «killing of any human being because»

«IPOB has never been involved in any retaliatory attacks or killing of any human being because we believe, along with our ancient values, that life is a rare gift from God, which is not in the place of man to take.»

Not exact matches

First, people often kill other human beings because they believe that the creator of the universe wants them to do it... Second, far greater numbers of people fall into conflict with one another because they define their moral com.munity on the basis of their religious affiliation...»

It seems to me they have much bigger fish to fry like: The Taliban treating women as less than human, stoning people to death, 60 year old men marrying teenage girls, cutting off an 18 year old girl's nose because she left her abusive husband (see TIME magazine a month ago), destroying over 125 schools because girls attend, suicidal Islamic fanatical cowards on every continent killing thousands of INNOCENT people, and these clowns are worried about their precious Koran being burned by a nutjob.

People burned as witches, blacks lynched by Christians in this county, people killed in human sacrifices, servants killed to accompany pharaohs on their journeys to the afterlife, untold numbers of people killed in various cultures because they were deemed to have offended God in some way, and so on.

Yet God covers our actions in His own blood, so that every time God looks like a lying, murderous, baby - killing, woman - raping bastard, it is because God has taken the burden of human sin upon His shoulders, and borne it away upon His body into death.

The term «kill» is loaded because you wouldn't call it «killing» when a guy doesn't protect every single sperm — yet, it is destruction of human life.

The issue of organs is very important because you still have not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?

Singer was more responsible than anyone else for making the term «speciesism» known, beginning in 1975 with his highly influential book Animal Liberation and continuing with his widely professed proposal that so - called human non-persons can be killed (infanticide or non-voluntary euthanasia) because of their «lower» moral status.

By saying it is up to the parents then a parent could kill a 6 month old and just say I diddnt see it as a child / human because of various reasons like he is dependant on my income etc...

- Hitler killed the Jews because he thought they were less human because of their religious beliefs.

Religion however has tried to supersede our humanity and tell us it's okay to kill those other humans because they aren't like you, they don't worship the same God as you, they don't have the same hope for an afterlife, they aren't special and «chosen» by God like you... that is the true face of evil on the planet, the one that tries to make you forget your humanity with bribes and extortion.

I just wonder why they are not fighting just as hard against other forms of «killing humans» like the death penalty (no one can say no innocent people have died on death row) the poor and sick and many elderly being allowed to starve and freeze because the religious right doesn't want to shoulder that burden through their taxes.

According to another teenager, Cornick said: «He was sort of saying he looked at the human body and how to kill people because he wanted to kill them fast.»

In fact, some of his greatest arguments with the soldiers / governments over the years have been over this very issue — the humans are afraid and so they want to kill the aliens while he wants to encourage life and cooperation (thinking in particular of the Ninth Doctor with Harriet Jones or even the battle of Canary Wharf when we lost Rose because of Torchwood opening the breach etc.).

People should realize that this is the Voice of those who have a voice because they have their dollars and they have the power to kill, with a button, the whole human race and under their own roof the power to kill, day by day, with counterinformation their own sickly conscience.23

In the day of Exodus the verse says he will not be punished (killed for taking a human life) if he lives because he is his property.

It's rough out there in nature, whether in the wilds of a rain forest or an urban jungle, partly because the earth is jammed with devout human predators unlike all others: we not only kill for food, we kill each other along with the natural forces nourishing life on this planet.

Hopefully there will be a unified world without religion, but the human race will be extinct by that time because we will all have killed ourselves in the name of religion / god / allah

Jeremy good message and quite relevant for today God is still looking at our hearts and motives for serving him or are we serving our own agenda as Jonah was.He did nt feel compassionate towards his enemies and who could blame him they had cruelly killed many Jews it was a question of life or death to his own people.The Jewish nation was no more deserving of Gods grace than the other nations that is revealed by sending Jonah to preach a message of hope and life.Ultimately God calls all by faith in him and is willing to be merciful to all nations and peoples that do not not deserve it just like us it is by grace that we all are forgiven.I am pleased that God is sovereign and knows whats best he is merciful to us.Our human nature is that it is better to kill our enemies before they can kill us and that is essentially Jonahs message that is why he struggled to be obedient to Gods will.Gods message is to forgive those that trespass against us and show mercy.Its complicated and it is natural to protect ourselves and our families from those who would seek to destroy them but ultimately its about trusting God with everything easier said than done.If it comes to a choice we will have to trust God and ask for his strength because we cant do it in ours.As Christ laid down his life for us are we ready to lay our lives and the lives of our families as a sacrifice for him.To me that is where the story of Jonah is leading to we have the choice to fight our enemies or to love them as God loves them.brentnz

We should all do ourselves a favor and help one anther stop listening to others tell us to fight wars and kill kiil kill that is not living life humans are easily brain washed and talked into things that end up hurting them I have seen this happen all the time he hurt our own loved ones sometimes because someone told us its what we have to do that is not living life do nt let someone tell you that you mean nothing because you mean a whole lot to someone but mostly you should mean a whole lot to yourself most of all that is the only way that you can take how you feel about yourself and pass that amazing feeling onto others and that is really all you need to know about life its there to enjoy treat yourself and others well live life live it well

I'm angry at your stupid myth slowly killing hundreds of thousands of infants that have no ex.istence other than pain — all because you don't want a piece of plastic between a man and a woman doing what every man and woman try to do because it's the second strongest drive in human ex.istence..

First, since human society always employs violence to enforce some set of standards, Christians» whom Christ called to live out a radically different form of community, one in which it is the crucified rather than his judges who is vindicated as God's Word» should simply take up the burden of civic order and abandon the Gospel where prudentially necessary because, you know, someone absolutely has to kill heretics, and so we should make sure the right heretics get killed.

Why would he think it immoral to try to save dozens of innocent victims — specific individual human beings about to be killed — because he was involved in a separate effort to save thousands of other men and women who were at risk of being rounded up and placed in those concentration camps?

Just as a car is not evil when it kills someone after spinning out of control of the driver, so also, creation is in chaos because the human drivers have lost control.

because it was scientists that created the Nuclear bomb, in fact it was science that created all weapons... so by your logic, Science is to blame for the Death of EVERY human being in Warfare throughout time except for those killed by rocks and sticks that are unsharpened and / or killed by use of barehands... Science has slaughtered BILLIONS...... of course that's nonsense right?

Well, the truth is, the cow industry is inhumane, (the overcrowded transportation conditions alone lead to to great suffering, severe cruelty and broken limbs), unhealthy (cows are pumped full of hormones, adrenalin from the fear from when they know they will be killed and anti-biotics — because the unhealthy conditions they live in promote infection and disease) and inefficient (cows must be fed 3 times the edible human grain than their bodies produce in meat).

Mass Audubon generally opposes most nuisance control practices, including spraying of pesticides to kill adult mosquitoes when there is a relatively low risk of mosquito - borne disease, because of the human health risks of pesticide exposures, harmful environmental effects, and unproven effectiveness of these activities.

The governor, who likened the militarization of Nigeria, being witnessed now to 1984 when President Muhammadu Buhari was military Head of State, said «killing unarmed Nigerians in the Southeast or anywhere in the country, just because some people are agitating is wrong and I wonder why none of our so called human rights activists is talking now.

Just a thought experiment (covering the missing human part): If you were a sub commander in charge of ICBMs and you learned your country was destroyed, and took the time to verify (days perhaps because you have no communication) and you are somewhat certain but not perfectly certain as to who did the attack, and your state no longer supports life, and your head of state is gone, do you fire your weapons killing millions of innocent people?

Steve Goose, director of the Arms Division at Human Rights Watch said «Syria is expanding its relentless use of cluster munitions, a banned weapon, and civilians are paying the price with their lives and limbs», «The initial toll is only the beginning because cluster munitions often leave unexploded bomblets that kill and maim long afterward.»

Using cells from cadavers, doctors have been experimentally transplanting pancreatic islets into humans for decades, but as many as 60 percent of the transplanted islets die immediately because they are cut off from their blood supply and are killed by an immune response due to direct injection into the bloodstream, and those that survive the transplant usually die within several months.

As David Quammen explains in Monster of God, we have turned the tables on the world's great predators and are rapidly killing them off — despite, or ironically, because of — the powerful role that large carnivores have played in the human imagination.

Gorsuch also authored a 2006 book, The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, in which he built a legal and moral argument that intentional killing is always wrong because human life is intrinsically valuable.

Because what is true is that people kill on the order of 10 million times as many sharks every year [as] sharks kill humans.

In fact, some species, such as the thylacine, were eradicated because they were considered a threat to human life — specifically, that they were killing off herds of sheep.

Because of the Center's successful state - listing petition, the Shasta pack and any other wolves that disperse to California are now fully protected under state law, and harming, harassing or killing a wolf in California for any reason other than in defense of human life is illegal.

No offense but your information is highly wrong (my opinion) because back then during patheolic era humans lived off meats and animals and even hunted and killed many back then and they continued to live longer then we live now because of all this government bullshit about wheat, grains, and legumes etc..

whose theoretical studies of the human brain's untapped potential make him an information source and then finally a kind of partner - savior to Lucy; the handsome nice - guy Parisian cop (Amr Waked) who assists Lucy during her climactic mission to acquire more of the experimental hormone to ingest and become whatever it is that she's becoming: a 1950s sci - fi monster, probably — the kind that can not be killed because everything you shoot at it makes it stronger and hungrier.

Two of the man's friends are killed there because the cult requires human sacrifices.

► An abandoned house is surrounded by workmen and a woman, all of whom have their shirts covering their nose and mouth because they say the smell of human feces is bad inside; one man covers his mouth and nose, chokes and coughs, enters the house and finds feces all over the bathroom walls, toilet and bathroom floors, as well as throughout a hallway to the front door and one wall contains the words «Kill Bankers»; he runs out, vomits (we see dark goo), he drinks water and spits some water out and then persuades a few men and the woman outside to begin to clean up the mess and the scene ends.

Coupled with that are their kids; both of Barrymore's sons are horribly annoying, to the point where you hope the director makes some risky choices, turns the film into a The Ghost & The Darkness rip - off and they both get violently killed by lions, while Sandler's daughters fair a little better, but only because they appear to have recognisable human personalities.

Princess Raccoon — This bizarre little pan-Asian film stars Favorite Actress © Zhang Ziyi, as, well, Princess of the Raccoons who falls in love, against natural law, with a human, who's on the run from his villainous father, the King of a neighboring Mountain, who's trying to kill him because a magic mirror claimed that the son would one day become more beautiful than the king.

This year alone, they released six of the most inventive, quality offerings out there: two terrifying survival thrillers, Damien Power's devastating and brilliant Killing Ground and Sam Patton's lesser but still - worthy Desolation; Sean Byrne's masterful tale of artistic obsession and satanic possession The Devil's Candy (all three even harder to endure because the featured families in peril are so human and likable); A Dark Song, an unnerving occult thriller in which a woman hires a medium to help make contact with her dead daughter; and House on Willow Street, which, similar to last year's horror highlight Don't Breathe, sees a house robbery — led by a woman with a mission, played by modern scream - queen Sharni Vinson — go terrible wrong, but this time in a more supernatural way.

If they believed that humans had value because they were humans, not because of money or religion or family name, it would be harder for them to kill.

Because safety is a concern for owners as they seek to kill the pests without hurting the pets — or the humans who love them — industry insiders agreed that consumers must be educated on proper application of these products.

Unlike up to 5 million pets in the United States that humans adopt, a minimum of 31 % of dogs and 41 % of cats are killed simply because they do not have an owner.

Because community cats are generally not socialized to humans, they are unadoptable — which means most of them are killed.

At least what some of us are capable of, as we see the results of it every day - dogs with bite wounds that have been used as bait dogs because there are human beings despicable enough to pay to see dogs chew each other to death and they need passive innocent dogs to teach these dogs to kill.

Yet feral cats are now widely appreciated as anything but the miserable helpless waifs depicted in earlier humane literature, who must be killed for their own good because they can not survive outside of a kind human home without unnatural suffering.

This question seems similar to the question: Would we be justified in systematically killing «excess» people because of human overpopulation?