Sentences with phrase «killing of innocent life»

Laws forbidding suicide assistance are based on the moral conviction that all killing of innocent life is wrong.

If the unborn child is a living human being, then abortion is nothing less than the killing of an innocent life.

In the following passage from the Ethics, he is discussing just war and capital punishment, and he asserts, «All deliberate killing of innocent life is arbitrary.»

Supporting a «right» to choose abortion simply masks and evades what abortion really is: the deliberate killing of innocent life.

Euthanasia is morally wrong because it involves the arbitrary killing of innocent life.

Our supporters know that we will do everything we can to help stop the killing of innocent lives from coast to coast.

Not exact matches

Anytime the Iron Dome system gets an upgrade — Israel stirs up Hamas by killing a few innocents to do live tests of the upgrades.

The fact that the passengers and crew of Flight 1549 were terrorized and the plane destroyed, that 11 innocent people are dead in Aurora, that the girl was held for seven days, ra.ped and sod.omized and will be traumatized for the rest of her life, or that a number of innocent civilians were killed by the missile.

This is all about control with religion and it has to stop.Gay people getting married doesn't have anything to do with straight people getting married.People are so full of hatred and disrespect it isn't funny.I'm glad this has come out now, because it really shows how evil people really are.But these people who are so into GOD, the Bible, Church, and the only way of life they live 4 god, by god are the 1s who prmote going around the world starting WARS, killing innocent women, men, children and families because Jesus guides them in everything they do.That is a crock of B.S. if I ever heard it.They will continus to use GOD and continue their EVIL ways to get whatever they want and CONTROL who ever they can.

Innocent women burned at the stake, gays ridiculed and denied rights, human beings turn themselves into living bombs: all in the name of some «god», undefined, unproven, undistinguished but always worth killing for.

What if killing the murderer would result in the loss of 3 other innocent lives?

Your god could have done all of it without torturing and killing an innocent life... LMAO!

There are some who hold this view, that the brutality of mankind was so great, that it was justice to kill them all, and among those who were the innocent victims in the flood (for certainly there had to be some), it was merciful to put them out of the misery of living under a horde of Hitlers.

Islam has been victims of terrorism too, those small group of people (terrorist) were created to give Islam a bad name, to keep people from converting killing innocent lives both Muslims and non-Muslims.

Learn to live with it, before preaching, millions innocent have been mimed and killed by american war of hinduism terrorism around the globe, hinduism, terrorism breeds hinduism, terrorism.

What those consequences will look like is anyone's guess, but justice cries out from the graves of the innocent killed and those victims, widows and orphans still living with the wounds, scars, and pain of the actions of one man.

To the folks who are vehemently denying this person was a Christian, I would urge you to consider this: If a person with a muslim name commits an act of terrorism, he is immediately labelled an «Islamic» terrorist, no questions asked, even though the Quran clearly states that a person who kills an innocent is like he / she has murdered then whole of humanity (the Quran mentions this in reference to murder of ANY innocent person, irrespective of the victims belief): To quote from the Quran: «On that account We ordained for the Children of Isra`il that if any one slew a person — unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land — it would be as if he slew the whole humanity: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the whole humanity.

But Notre Dame is a Catholic University and the Catholic Church and hierarchy, and Catholics in large numbers, believe that abortion is killing an innocent fetus and a seriously sinful violation of the child's right to life.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

If a pro-life position on abortion is the litmus test for Evangelicals, how does that track with supporting a death penalty that guarantees the killing of adult life, often innocent life?

We, as Christians, should not bowl to their Aiatolas, but as they do when exploding a bomb killing lots and lots of innocent civilians lives, let them try the same kind of death, without any warning, trial, judgment, etc..

First from the point of view of those who claim the building will be an insult over the event of 9/11, I don't think any one can take away from them that feeling, be it genuine or otherwise, the fact still remains, that a group of radical individuals, who claim to be Muslims, killed innocent individuals from all walks of life; race and religion and country, in the name of Islam.

«But for citizens and elected officials alike, the basic principle is simple: We must begin with a commitment never to intentionally kill, or collude in the killing, of any innocent human life, no matter how broken, unformed, disabled, or desperate that life may seem.

That is how we accept the Newton killing of 20 innocent children as we believe this is due to collective karma of their past lives, not current one where they are just innocent babes.

One of the central tasks of this revolution is the rejection of both the prohibition on killing the innocent and of the Christian idea of the sanctity of human life on which it is based.

and let many innocents be killed and the lives of many families be ruined.

Why not use technology to save Americans lives and the lives of those innocents these terrorists kill??? This is only an issue because the military contractors are making it so.

The first and most fundamental human right is the right to life, or, to be more precise, the right of an innocent person not to be deliberately killed, whether by public authority or private license.

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the tsunami that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

For instance, the Passion themes in Isaiah 52 - 58 about the obedient servant of God who suffers willfully and willingly for our healing and salvation present Christians with a series of paradoxes which are difficult to grasp: the honored one is despised and rejected, the innocent is charged with guilt, the healer is wounded, and the one who offers life is killed.

«We need to take away their access and options of being able to do the same again and I think it has to be retaliatory for a number of reasons: there has to be a serious lesson sent out to the Syrians and to their allies in Iran and Russia that you can not attack innocent civilians, kill people, destroy their lives, injure them for long term.»

Divorced from God, an individual's right to life can lead them to kill and destroy the lives of the innocent, the weak, the poor, the voiceless, and defenseless.

Because one of the lessons of fighting terrorism in the last 15 years or so is yes, killing terrorists can save innocent lives.

«Nigerian Government stands with the rest of the world in condemning, in the strongest terms, the killing of innocent people who have been deprived of their fundamental right to life.»

Represented by the Minister of Interior, Abduraham Dambazau, the President said, «I am very worried and saddened about the persistent killings and kidnappings in our country, especially the wastage of innocent lives, particularly in Benue State.

What about the lives of those innocents» black foreigners who were killed by their fellow blacks Africans in South Africa?

By this release, we want to register our collective disappointment in the handling of issues of security by the president, from the conducts of his party supporters, to the killing of innocent officers who have only taken upon themselves to lay their precious lives to protect the nation and its citizens.

«These defendants are charged with creating a killing field in a crowd of innocent people, showing depraved indifference to human life and causing the death of Carey Gabay,» Ken Thompson, the Brooklyn district attorney, said in a statement about the case.

We should be brutally frank here, we should not encourage the deliberate killing of the image of innocent people, it does not matter whether the person is a woman or a man, we can not live in a society where people can speak evil, very deep stinking evil about others, disgrace innocent souls, destroy innocent leaders, and go dance with the gods, no way!

Just a thought experiment (covering the missing human part): If you were a sub commander in charge of ICBMs and you learned your country was destroyed, and took the time to verify (days perhaps because you have no communication) and you are somewhat certain but not perfectly certain as to who did the attack, and your state no longer supports life, and your head of state is gone, do you fire your weapons killing millions of innocent people?

The last assault in Benue State where innocent citizens were slaughtered in their place of worship is barbaric, satanic and evil, not only because priests were killed but because the live of every Nigerian is important.

In contrast, deontological approaches focus on moral rules and ideas of rights and duties, such that certain things (like killing an innocent person) are wrong even if they maximize good outcomes (like saving extra lives).

The most expository line of dialogue in the entire film is said by Pearce's Eric, offering advice to a traveling companion who has just unintentionally killed an innocent bystander: «You should never stop thinking about a life you've taken.

«Bottle Rocket» then falls into a version of a familiar movie story, in which essentially innocent characters choose, or are pushed into, a life of crime, and find themselves increasingly alienated from society when all they really want to do is hang out and kill time.

Remember sophomore year in college, when you would have six - hour conversations about whether it would be morally defensible to kill one innocent person if it would save the lives of lots of other innocent people?

Lane, the cynical terrorist, believes he's «killing to bring about change,» hoping that his taking of innocent lives will somehow make the world a better place.

Instead, think of how you would feel if someone else's beloved pet, or worse yet, someone's innocent child were scarred for life (or god forbid, killed).

So I ask you, as a citizen of this community, is it your will that we kill the vast majority of pets that are unfortunate enough to find their way to a municipal shelter; or, is it your will that everything that is feasible be done to ensure life of the helpless and innocent?

It is a sorry time we live in when you condemn a breed of dog death for a few bad owners it's like condemning killing a whold race of people because some of their religion faction kills innocents!!

As the world's largest no - kill rescue and adoption organization, North Shore Animal League America has been at the forefront of saving the lives of innocent animals since 1944.