Sentences with phrase «killing of many»

They know that abortion is the killing of an innocent, unborn human being, a child who is recognisably such.

«We are witnessing an existential and genocidal threat against Christians in at least 60 countries,» stated Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, in response to the killing of four nuns in Yemen last week.

If overpopulation were taken to be a justification, it would allow the killing of any helpless population, preferably without the infliction of pain.

Our abortion law is responsible for the killing of 500 babies each day in the UK.

It has been a deep embarrassment to watch some Catholics brutally twist their minds and consciences into the service of defending their claim that faithful and staunchly anti-abortion Catholics should support a radically pro-abortion presidential candidate who says his first act in office will be to sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which would, by federal mandate, eliminate even the most minimal legal discouragements of the killing of unborn...

There is, Pope John Paul II says, no choice which can ever legitimate the killing of the innocent.

Is abortion always the killing of a human being?

If that were an adequate resolution, it would seem to follow, given the humanity of the fetus, that infanticide, the killing of the elderly, indeed any killing for convenience, would be licensed if atonement and redemption were planned in advance.

There are people who would allow the killing of the newborn and the senile, but I doubt that is a view with general acceptance.

That our laws permit the killing of unborn children is already a sign of the barbarity which arises from radical individualism, albeit it dressed as virtue in the claim to be ensuring the «right to reproductive health».

On 21 July, she tweeted: «The killing of innocent civilians must stop.

We have seen the tribal practice of honor killing of females suspected of sexual transgression in modern tribal societies, even when they have been the victims of rape.

Supporting a «right» to choose abortion simply masks and evades what abortion really is: the deliberate killing of innocent life.

How many time this öut reaching «were caught with plans for more killing of civilians?

This is especially true when the Christians in American offer full and complete blessings on everything the United States does overseas, including the killing of Muslims and the bombing of cities.

Describing euthanasia as «this ghastly doctrine» which «tries to justify the murder of blameless men and would seek to give legal sanction to the forcible killing of invalids, cripples, the incurable and the incapacitated» he went on:

We sin if we support pro-choice candidates without a truly proportionate reason for doing so — that is, a reason grave enough to outweigh our obligation to end the killing of the unborn.

21) the kidnapping and apparent killing of a follower of Zoraster in the dark world of Islamic Pakistan.

17) The killing of 58 Christians in a Catholic church in one of the latest acts of horror and terror in Iraq.

Euthanasia is morally wrong because it involves the arbitrary killing of innocent life.

A video purporting to show the killing of American aid worker Peter Kassig, whose grandfather was a Methodist minister, has been posted on the internet.

Was anyone who donated to Bush's campaign donating to the killing of civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan?

I doubt the killing of 2 of them a year is going to make any difference.

The point of John 19:31 - 37 is mainly to insist on the reality of Jesus» death (verse 33) on the day before Passover, to emphasize that his death coincided with the killing of the Passover lambs.

Protest — yes, but killing of innocent people is not what Islam stands for.

The doctrine of the necessary conformity of civil law to moral truth imposes on conscientious citizens of a regime that authorizes the killing of the unborn and infirm a clear obligation of resistance.

Peter Singer can write essays endorsing the killing of infants, but someone who publishes an essay questioning any aspect of gay liberation will be blacklisted.

BUT no one, and I repeat no one is calling the killing of 4 innocent American diplomats as «hateful.»

In addition to these crazy and immoral laws, there are plenty of examples of God's irrationality by his direct killing of many people for reasons that defy any rational explanation such as killing children who make fun of bald people, and the killing of a man who tried to keep the ark of God from falling during transport.

There is no way mother earth would accept ritual killing of such beautiful specie.

For all who believe in a God of love, justice, and mercy, it will mean constant prayer not only for the victims of the «culture of death,» but also for those who are joined in the great struggle on their behalf, and, indeed, for those misguided souls who, by political action or by personal involvement in the killing of the unborn or infirm, have made themselves their oppressors.

Does Allah approve of honor killing of wives and children?

It condones murder, violence, and killing of non-believers.

If so, why does your god condone war, murder, violence, and the killing of non-believers?

I think it is reasonable to conclude that most of the time we do humane killing of animals.

Prophet Mohammad, peace be upon him, won't be happy with the killing of the innocent people who have been killed.

Thou shalt not kill, actually is better rendered thou shalt not murder, as in the killing of innocents such as unborns who can not speak for themselves.

People should wake up and realize that NO RELIGION condones killing of another.

God should be protecting them and killing all of us heathen Liberals!

How we come to view Charlie Gard's case has direct import for how we will view the direct killing of infants, an ancient and barbaric practice that has been reintroduced in the Netherlands in deceptively civilized guise as the «Groningen protocol.»

In 1979 when the current government came into power, there was a particularly violent wave of persecution that resulted in the killing of a number of Baha'is and the «disappearance» of two national spiritual assemblies.

This protocol allows the killing of infants of less than one year of age; the victims are very often disabled.

This is precisely what many supporters of the direct killing of infants argued in an «infanticide symposium» published by the Journal of Medical Ethics in 2013.

The core of Islam is the killing of infidels (Christians in Muhammad's eyes) which is rewarded with direct access to paradise.

He and Quran specifically prohibitted sucide and killing of innocent and non combatants.

The Christian disciple is not one who has arrived at perfection; he is «on the way» — and this requires what traditionally is called «mortification» or the killing of whatever is unworthy and the «sanctification» or development of whatever is good.

The killing of the scapegoat provides a means for the formation of a new social unanimity and cohesion, as acquisitive mimesis is transformed into conflictual mimesis, which is resolved by the destruction of someone arbitrarily designated as the cause of the conflict.

The Scapegoat In Girard's sociology, the crisis of societal disintegration is resolved through the identification and killing of a chosen victim, a scapegoat.

He confesses that during World War II, Americans grieved little over the killing of German or Japanese civilians by Allied firebombs and nuclear detonations.

Now the killing of babies and the flood.