Sentences with phrase «killing unborn»

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi implored his country to stop killing unborn girls on Thursday, warning that its growing gender imbalance would have serious consequences.

Instead, it lies in changing hearts and minds such that killing an unborn child becomes as unacceptable as killing any other human being.

McKenna links their preparedness to accept the Democratic Party's adoption of an unambiguous pro-abortion policy in 1980 to four further causes: (i) an inferiority complex towards their «secular humanist» «soul mates (in) the civil rights movement» who «dismissed (Catholic) concerns about killing unborn children.»

However I know that Jesus is EXTREMELY happy that mean man Keith Olbermann no longer has his mug on TV, because Jesus was ALL about love and NOT killing unborn babies or trash talk about Sarah.

The argument is that Christians are contradicting themselves because they are against killing unborn children, yet we apparently believe that we are commanded to kill people for other reasons.

its never a «potential» human as many of you say... a kidney is a bodily organ and nothing more... thus to compare it to a fetus is idiocy and a desperation to try to justify killing the unborn

Until we stop killing unborn babies, I don't give a flip if the indians want to kill a few birds.

Evangelicals think killing unborn fetuses is a sin but killing adults by lethal injection is righteous.

You have to be a nut in order to be against someone from killing their unborn baby?

God endows each human person with dignity, and it is not up to man to remove this dignity by killing the unborn.

First we were to approve of killing unborn babies, then babies in process of birth; next came newborns with physical defects, now newborns in perfect health.

God doesn't want us killing our unborn, nor does He want SSC's to marry.

You can not justify killing the unborn because of your faux concern over exceptions.If you don't have the wherewithal to support life then be proactive and get snipped.

When they are promoting all kinds of sick perversion, killing unborn babies and can not stop exploitation of a billion people, what are the earthlings talking about?

You go «eliminate» some cell clumps... but if it was just «cell clumps», why has every woman I've ever met who's had an abortion express great pain and sorrow and lament over killing their unborn baby rather than feeling like they just clipped their nails?

God DOES allow free will, which is precisely why killing unborn children is currently legal in the US.

So if those human beings feel that flying airplanes in to buildings, or torturing other humans, or killing their unborn children is right, they can.

They need to become secular and believe in doing what feels good, adultry, killing unborn babies, men lying with men, and the end justifies the means.

Kendall, 70 + % of those engaged in «killing unborn babies» in the USA each tear were believers.

I just killed an unborn chicken.

Still, we kill the unborn ones.It happens every day!You didn't make it, Unborn Child.They wouldn't let you be.They just expelled a blob of cells.It's the «New Morality.»

Yet could not VHA have suggested to the U.S. Supreme Court that, since the Court has held that there is a constitutional right to kill unborn human beings, there is surely also the constitutional right, even of a secular hospital, to refuse to?

But when that manifestation of disoriented tenderness occurs again as dissipated by an almost universal acceptance of abortion, Mother Teresa is right to say (as Percy quotes her): «If a mother can kill her unborn child, I can kill you, and you can kill me.»

Abortionists kill their unborn because they don't deserve them.

Secular politics inevitably lead to annihilation of mankind as they have no remourse for killing unborns and terminalli ills.

Believe it or not, the ultra liberal look just as foolish (seriously: set the lab mice we are testing cancer treatments on free, but kill the unborn children because their mothers deserve not to have their lives ruined by stressful bundles of joy)

We kill unborn babies, we kill wolves from helicopters, we kill each other, we kill truths, we kill respect.

What sense does it make to kill an unborn child to prevent future mistreatment?

In 1 BC, a Roman citizen wrote to his wife telling her to kill her unborn child if it turned out to be a girl.

If it is permissible to kill the unborn human for convenience, it is surely permissible to kill those thought to be soon to die for the same reason.

Who has the right to kill an unborn human for their selfish purposes?

The intellectually superior liberals who think its just fine to kill the unborn because a baby might be an inconvenience.

When one party has elevated lifestyle libertinism to the first of constitutional principles (and is prepared to kill unborn children, jettison free speech, and traduce religious freedom in service to hedonism), while the other is prepared to nominate a fantasist who spun grotesque fairy tales about an alleged connection between an opponent's family and Lee Harvey Oswald shortly before he closed the deal?

God killed all those people for a reason, the expectant mother kills her unborn child for a reason, do you think they are both evil?

From the news coverage this has received, you'd think that one of the most pressing issues in America is that women who want to kill their unborn child have to endure the horrific inconvenience of pressing a button on their smartphone and using Google to search for the location of the nearest abortion mill.

She has reasons for her decision, do you think she is evil if she chooses to kill her unborn child?

The left applauds when the courts uphold a woman's right to kill an unborn child.

Once again this god kills the unborn, including their pregnant mothers.

I completely against abortion, yet I live in a country where it is legal to kill an unborn baby.

Catholics think it is wrong to use contraceptives and that it is wrong to kill unborn children.

I think it's more about being forced by the government to provide the means to kill the unborn more than not trusting their employees or providing choices.

While it is true that these issues have occasioned much controversy in American politics and that we ought to engage civilly and respectfully with those who dissent from Christian teachings, it is not true that God might or might not want us to kill unborn babies or that God might or might not call us to live by biblical sexual norms.

To those who can not agree with the proposition that individuals have a moral or constitutional right to kill the unborn, or that such a right defines the trans - generational covenant of the American political order, the Court urged acceptance out of respect for the rule of law.

It is AMAZING to me that a woman can choose to KILL her unborn child because she doesn't want responsibility... but a woman who desires to flee from the environment in which she (and quite possibly her baby) was traumatized and has a tragedy occur... then she's just a negligent murderer.

Again, who gives you or any woman this right, or in your terms this «option,» to abort which is kill an unborn child?

In order to make this journey more perilous, screenwriter Carlos Kotkin inserts a new «villain» presence — an evil henchman sent by King Herod to track down the couple and kill the unborn child, who Herod sees as a threat to his throne.

Do I acccept this (i.e. a woman's right to kill my unborn child)?

Not exact matches

It permits gender - cide: Around the world, millions of unborn girls are killed because they are girls.

And excessive global warming is killing millions of born and unborn babies worldwide more than abortion had.

Archbishop François Xavier Nguyên Van Thuân: Let us pray for all the men and women of the world, especially for minors who are victims of abuse, for the poor, the alienated, the disadvantaged; let us pray for those who are most defenceless, the unborn killed in their mother's womb or even exploited for experimental purposes by those who abuse the promise of biotechnology and distort the aims of science.