Sentences with phrase «kills humans is not»

Not exact matches

After a preliminary investigation, Police chief Sylvia Moir said that the collision that killed 49 - year - old Elaine Herzberg wasn't Uber's fault and the accident «would have been difficult to avoid» regardless of whether the other car was autonomous or human - driven.

But killing off their few fellow human inhabitants may not be the right answer for the characters in the long run in a world full of the undead.

«Horrific mass killings receive the most media attention, but as can be seen by the numbers, they only represent a small portion of the total costs - human and medical - of gun injuries in the United States,» said David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center in Boston, who was not involved with the study.

«I think the self - driving car has the opportunity to not only improve productivity for the people in the car, which will be a huge economic boost for those people; Not only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.&raqnot only improve productivity for the people in the car, which will be a huge economic boost for those people; Not only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.&raqNot only has the opportunity to save lives — over a million people die worldwide in road deaths today caused by human drivers, and I think we can take that very close to zero, which is very good for both human welfare and for economic productivity — it's a very serious dent in productivity when people get killed; And then all the ancillary industries that end up getting built out.»

Its a WAKE UP CALL to all the human beings of the world but Muslims, these r the people who r responisible for killing of innocents all over the world, Americans have to understand that ISLAM does not have the concept of co-existenc this is the words of Jinnah, if they are not stopped then the days are not far behind when US and European countries will have Kashmirs where Muslims out numbered the Natives and now dominate the place.

William just thinks that we should just kill everyone who doesn't agree with him and then the world will be perfect, because he is the greatest human being alive.

That did not happen: there is no geological record of a world - wide flood, there is not enough diversity to regenerate the population we currently, there is not enough water to cover the earth to the height of Everest, the logistics of retrieving and returning animals to the then - unknown Americas, Australia, etc. were staggeringly difficult, managing the animals on the Ark was impossible — a few humans keeping predators from their prey, cleaning the waste, etc., pretty much all life on earth would have been killed, etc. etc..

The law says we can kill and eat animals as long as it's done in a safe and humane way, it also says a fertilized egg isn't a human until it reaches 24 weeks.

It is not for me to interpret God's word as carte blanche to kill other human beings.

The Holocaust was not all about the Jews, it was about Nazi Germany's attempt to kill off ALL who did not comply with their standards of a human being.

Yet could not VHA have suggested to the U.S. Supreme Court that, since the Court has held that there is a constitutional right to kill unborn human beings, there is surely also the constitutional right, even of a secular hospital, to refuse to?

nobody has a right to mock about others, you are judged by your actions and deeds, it's not possible to know about every faith in this world, but how ignorant can human mankind be especially after innocent Sikhs killed in Oak creek Wisconsin which was very widely covered.

I believe that human actors who fail to give pride of place to moral boundaries that must never be crossed, such as the direct killing of the innocent, and who instead are ready to see their obligations in terms of moving beyond them in favor of «good results,» will be harder put «to take seriously the role that divine authority plays in morality»; for they will to that extent lose a sense of the moral limits that remind us of our finitude and anticipate consideration of a law of our being that is not one of our making.

If we actuall had a Congress who cared about the People they swore to serve and did not take vacations 1 week for every 2 they work (new Boehner rule when he became Speaker), actually did work and created bills that were other than ending abortion rights or killing Medicare, stopped opposing ending the fraud Bush wars that raise our debt by more than a trillion a month (and Republicans then blame Obama for the rising debt from their wars), and acted like humans we would already be well into recovery.

Further, it is not true that being killed by a fully autonomous military drone necessarily violates the dignity of the human person.

If a person needs the fear of eternal punishment by a make believe god to deter them from killing, stealing or any other sort of malevolence, they are not decent human beings to begin with.

An omnipotent ruler probably wouldn't need to kill a whole bunch of infants to try (unsuccessfully) to make a point to some human ruler — but maybe he's just a sick and twist omnipotent being...

From the colonial period through the twenty - first century, federal, state, and territorial governments have an unbroken tradition of protecting conscientious objectors who can not abide the government's mandate to kill, cut, or medicate another human being.

Liberals generally are for the killing of babies and other horendous ideas that war against the sanctity and liberty of human beings... Giving men with this kind of a world view «equal time» isn't what I think God desires.

The term «kill» is loaded because you wouldn't call it «killing» when a guy doesn't protect every single sperm — yet, it is destruction of human life.

The issue of organs is very important because you still have not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?

Those are not human beings who are brothers, fathers, or sons that we are killing in our wars; no, they are «Krauts,» «Japs,» «Chinks,» «V.C.,» communists or mercenaries.

While we do not have anything like a final, scientific approach to maximizing human happiness, it seems safe to say that rap.ing and killing children will not be one of its primary consti.tuents.

A civilization can not tolerate private executions, as a civilization can not long survive the license to kill unwanted human beings.

As for what I apparantly do nt get, the thing I do nt get is how someone could kill a human life on purpose, as you said conception is the continuation of humans.

I'm not going to define good and evil according to humans, since that would kill moral realism, and most Christians (most people, in fact) would not be willing to let that happen.

States can crush or kill human beings, but they can not alienate them from their responsibility to God and conscience.

Though on a smaller scale than in the early «80s, political killings still go on, yet not one ranking military officer has ever been tried for human rights violations — not even in the Romero case, despite the unassailable evidence implicating (then Major) Roberto D'Aubuisson and his cohorts.

to show this, i would like to have any human who believes that hitler was doing «gods work» to come over and let me give them a acid shower, or just not feed them, or maybe kill all the people they know in front of them and them not feed them.

Ironic how human beings want to kill each other to avenge the honor of God, much less the honor of the violent, hate - talking prophet Muhammed, a mere human being, not a god.

We would not interfere with the wilderness ways in which animals suffer and are killed by one another, but we think that there is far more, and far less necessary, suffering among creatures for whom human beings have assumed responsibility.

On the question of taking a human life, for example, the church has always distinguished between killing and murder, murder being the morally condemned act, and killing the physical act which is not always wrong.

Religion however has tried to supersede our humanity and tell us it's okay to kill those other humans because they aren't like you, they don't worship the same God as you, they don't have the same hope for an afterlife, they aren't special and «chosen» by God like you... that is the true face of evil on the planet, the one that tries to make you forget your humanity with bribes and extortion.

I just wonder why they are not fighting just as hard against other forms of «killing humans» like the death penalty (no one can say no innocent people have died on death row) the poor and sick and many elderly being allowed to starve and freeze because the religious right doesn't want to shoulder that burden through their taxes.

BO says abortions should be «safe, legal and rare» but says nothing about the basic tenet of proper human conduct i.e. Thou Shalt Not Kill.

After all, in the Holocaust they were killing actual human beings, people who were undeniably, not just potentially or marginally, real people with real rights.

I was making a not so veiled putdown of the average xtian believer who wears his WWJD lapel pin while cleaning his stash of high powered guns hoping to one day use them to kill other human beings.

Why wouldn't it also use wacko humans to kill children for stupid reasons like being infected with devils.

If God killed / will kill (per your bible) many humans / gays, isn't THAT more of a SIN than being «created» human / gay by that same God?

Christian positions on embryos «Oh its human», Christian positions on guns that killed 6 - 7 years old's is: «Oh, we are not sure where we stand there».

Considering God was really angry again and wanted to kill off the entire human race by the time of Noah (God is an angry murderous SOB, isn't he), it seems obvious that God has a lot less control and ability to see the future than he wants you to believe.

More people have been killed in the name of God than by any other event in human history... guess «Thou Shalt Not Kill» is just too hard to understand.

It's not bad enough that humans have to fight and kill over land and resources, they have to fight and kill over IMAGINARY beings!

Pro-abortion people do not disagree that killing an innocent human is bad.

It is not good enough merely to refrain from killing your enemy; you must love him too: «Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who treat you badly» (Lk 6, 27 - 28) Jesus» words seem a divine madness and entirely contrary to human nature.

So you don't believe that all humans are born sinful meriting eternal punishment or maybe they are, but the god will excuse their sinful nature if he kills them when they are very young?

You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God, but let us not come with any patronising nonsense about his being a great human teacher.

Obama says abortions should be «safe, legal and rare» but says nothing about the basic tenet of proper human conduct i.e. Thou Shalt Not Kill.

People do not need the God of Abraham to live a moral life, no more than the millions of religious zealots who use their interpretation of religious dogma to dominate, subjugate and kill other human beings.

Because we can't not know that it is wrong to deliberately kill human beings, there are only four options.