Biologist E. O. Wilson first put forward this idea of
kin selection as an explanation for homosexuality in 1978, but for some time now it has been considered an unlikely scenario.
Not exact matches
It seems
as if
kin selection could actually damage the group.
A cooperative living structure was more likely to be favoured when both parental genes were shared by siblings, a trait known
as «
kin selection.»
He suggested that natural
selection could encourage altruistic behavior among
kin so
as to improve the reproductive potential of the «family.»
For social insects, I'm presenting
as much evidence
as I can summon for each of the two opposing views: Either collateral
kin selection is the key, or group
selection favored by very unusual environments caused them to be altruistic.
If you look carefully it turns out to be things like
kin selection rebranded
as group
selection.
This is part of the reason that many have suggested that
kin selection, or at least its formulation
as Hamilton's rule, might not be practically useful.
(The geneticist J.B.S. Haldane, who explored early concepts of
kin selection in the 1930s, is sometimes alleged to have joked that,
as a human being, he would lay down his life for two brothers or eight cousins.)