Sentences with phrase «kind of a conclusion of»

The partnership will be put to certain kind of conclusion of a blissful ending.

Not exact matches

Nevertheless, as the study is the largest and longest study of its kind, more research is likely needed before we reach any definitive conclusions about how well it works — or doesn't.

Since then, her ongoing research and those of dozens of colleagues have led to conclusions that urban pollution, particularly the kind you live with in dense areas like New York City, New Delhi, London, and Mexico City, is a critical health concern.

«The conclusion about a company's value will be based on an analysis of all kinds of information, such as the historical profit - and - loss picture, other financial records, the customer base, internal controls, key employees, competitive details, and much more,» says Catherine Bienert, CEO of Bottom Line Management, an Atlanta business - brokerage and business - appraisal firm.

His conclusion: «It should be accompanied by some kind of counseling process.»

I mean, it was kind of a foregone conclusion by many people on Wall Street that we would n`t get that 3 percent mark.

On the other hand, Lockhart said, «If we see a deterioration from this point, and I would say my more realistic fear is just a kind of ambiguous picture of mixed data that signal neither accelerating strength nor necessarily deterioration, but that kind of moping along in the middle, then I think it's not a foregone conclusion that the asset purchase program should be removed or be removed rapidly.»

The reason people come to that kind of natural conclusion is because they see waste or they see inefficiency or they see a lack of transparency.

And it's cool that you kind of came to the same conclusions doing it yourself.

Meb: You know, Paul, this is so interesting because, you know, you and I, we've kind of arrived at the same conclusions, you know, having managed money professionally for over a decade now.

Our conclusion in 2011 was that Harper «has shown the kind of flexibility in applying fiscal Conservative principles that is needed to stay in power».

Our conclusion was that Harper had failed in many areas, but that he «has shown the kind of flexibility in applying fiscal conservative principles that is needed to stay in power».

I think with that kind of acceptance, we can listen to each other, learn, even if we don't always get to the same conclusion.

He does not give us the impression that he and I are exactly the kind of people who reach heaven easily, a move too often found at the conclusion of a Mary Oliver poem.

The questions can drive us mad, cause us to overanalyze the situation and come to all kinds of conclusions that have no grounding in truth.

Short cuts, of the kind that Concept Art peddles, are based on the banal and false conclusion that the development of the productive forces renders all work superfluous.

As we have just seen, Christian realism leads to the conclusion that violence is natural and normal to man and society, that violence is a kind of necessity imposed on governors and governed, on rich and poor.

I have tended to do this kind of deconstructive questioning in private, and then write about the positive conclusions I've reached.

The bio feedback era has brought us to one of two conclusions: either there is a dimension of reality beyond the physical which can indeed relate to the physical, or the mind is only rarefied matter and what we have is merely one kind of body acting on another.

But the metaphor does direct us toward a process of inquiry involving certain kinds of practical moral thinking which might lead to such conclusions.

This leads to the important conclusion that values are really one kind of fact.

From my reading over several years of the excellent East Harlem Protestant Parish reports, the initial experimental ministry of its kind, I have drawn two general conclusions.

The «wrong» kind of Christian is one who jumps to the conclusion that Obama is the antichrist.

However we seem to be finding that some theologies are more divisive than others, and according to Steve we have «Jesus» to thank for that (which I find kind of strange considering others here are following Jesus and arriving at different conclusions).

The conclusions drawn by Bruce A. Kimball in Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education (Teachers College Press, 292 pp., $ 19.95) are of a different kind.

Also contrary to Jones» conclusion is Richard L. Brougham's recent attempt to save Whitehead from this dilemma by accusing Bergson of over-emphasizing continuity while Whitehead's kinder, gentler notion of «simplification» could provide us with a thoughtful and pragmatic account of experience that did nor have to reduce discontinuities to «mere appearances.»

In conclusion, it should be made clear that the kind of existence ideally embodied in him is reflected also in most of the Greek and Roman philosophy that followed him and looked back to him with special reverence.

Since each kind of inquiry is concerned with the same humanity, the several conclusions reached should be mutually complementary.

Scientific discoveries have a way of leading to more questions, not coming to some kind of final conclusion.

The net effect of both the assumptions and the conclusion is that some boys are born into situations in which the combination of gene expression and social context heavily determine what kind of person they will be.

«We speak on this subject very cautiously and diffidently,» he writes, «rather by way of discussion than coming to definite conclusions... We suppose that the goodness of God will restore the whole creation to unity in the end... If anyone thinks that matter will be utterly destroyed, it passes my comprehension how all these substances can live and exist without material bodies, since to live without material substance is the privilege of God alone... Another perhaps may say that in the consummation all matter will be so purified that it may be thought of as a kind of ethereal substance... But only God knows.»

But he distances himself from the kind of relativism that draws the further mistaken conclusion that, in the absence of modes of reasoning that can resolve conflicts in principle, the contending parties must alter their own modes of justification and reject all substantive conceptions of truth.

Mr. Carson points out that the term «chaos theory» is a misnomer because it is based on a mathematically demonstrable set of conclusions regarding certain kinds of determinate but complex physical systems.

To argue that the corporation's defining objective is «enhancing corporate profit and shareholder gain» leads, in his opinion, to unacceptable conclusions: «To say that a corporation's only goal is to make money would be to define the business corporation — for the first time in American or English law as I understand it — as a kind of shark that lives off of the community rather than as an important agency in the construction, maintenance, and transformation of our shared lives.»

Conclusion: Having some kind of spiritual life is in fact good for you and will make positive physiological changes in your brain, particularly the amygdala.

One wishes that writers like Geevarghese Mar Osthathios could have pushed their initial suspicions to some kind of conclusion that could have offered fresh perceptions of mission theory and praxis.

This kind of self - critical exegesis stops building conclusions on top of conclusions, and from constructing and opposing hypotheses.

But his methods were careful and the results tally with what one might expect; and they seem, on the whole, to justify his practical conclusion, which is that if you should expose to a converting influence a subject in whom three factors unite: first, pronounced emotional sensibility; second, tendency to automatisms; and third, suggestibility of the passive type; you might then safely predict the result: there would be a sudden conversion, a transformation of the striking kind.

Whereas for Pannenberg the meaning of the resurrection is inseparable from the kind of claim it makes and the language which is appropriate to that claim, as well as inextricably rooted in the texts of the New Testament and in the Jewish world of the early first century, for Polkinghorne the resurrection is a conclusion that is required by logic and enabled by a theory of physical matter.

The fatal conclusion of the physiologist flows from his assuming offhand another kind of functional dependence, and treating it as the only imaginable kind.3

After years and years of this kind of delusional thinking, I've come to the conclusion that pain and suffering are a fact of life.

But moral conclusions depend on a kind of reasoning, not merely on «sensibilities» upon which we do not reflect.

If and when this particular epoch has reached its conclusion, with all the good extracted from it that a living and loving God can put into it and get out of it, we might well envisage other epochs in which other kinds of good are to be achieved.

(1 Cor 15:12) he is arguing from the principle of faith that Christ has risen from the dead to the conclusion of the general resurrection by mounting a kind of syllogism.

The consolation addressed to Hezekiah certainly relates to the end of the siege but only as a kind of accessory conclusion, the real point being the renewing of the covenant between the Lord and his people under the rubric of «the remnant.»

A little context here would be nice before everyone jumps to conclusions that Jesus was married because someone recounted that he said «My wife...» Are these people really historians, or folks with some kind of agenda?

Holmes is positing the existence of a certain kind of person to explain observed phenomena (not, as he habitually says, making deductions), but we would not normally call his conclusions science, even when true and convincing.

Drawing any kind of moral conclusion from the Bible is problematic for reasons more fundamental than the author states.

From time to time thinkers and pastors, identified at the time by authority as «heretics», seen by others as prophets, and by some historians now as social revolutionaries, reached the conclusion that the Christian Gospel spoke of a body of Christians, of an incipient «Church», of a kind far removed from the type of political and economic structure maintained by Roman Canon Law.

I do not believe in this kind of God, yet there is no way to hold Calvinism and avoid these conclusions, except to say «God is God and can do as He wants».