Sentences with phrase «kind of a good thing because»

But I found that actually being left on my own was kind of a good thing because I wasn't asking for advice or help but I just did what felt comfortable.
It's okay if i don't get to shop at Barney's, you can shop online anyway and it's also kind of a good thing because it's not good for the wallet.
But this is kind of a good thing because I don't own anything that looks like this dress!

Not exact matches

«If you anticipate the kind of huge appreciation in your personal wealth that could come from an IPO or a company sale, the best thing you can do is transfer stock to your heirs before the sale, because it will be worth much less then, and that minimizes the tax liability,» explains Allan Landau, a partner with Boston law firm Sherburne, Powers & Needham.
Levandowski: When we got the tech kind of finally working, «working» is in quotes because there was a lot of things that were missing, but working well enough that it would go, it was kind of a very special moment.
I pray to whichever holy name (God, Allah, Jehovah, Krishna, Jesus, etc.) suits the ONE Omniscient, Omnipresent, Omnipotent being that ignorance is wiped away from our species and we become a closer, more loving, peaceful creature and that we realize how much time we waste and how much further we push our fellow neighbor and brother under God, regardless of creed, away debating over who's God is better and discover the error of our ways before we destroy each other... before it's too late, because The End is Nigh!!!!! LOL!!!!! Really though, isn't the world full of enough tragedy, and aren't their so many more important things that need our energy and attention like the innocent children in Pakistan dying from diseases from the flood or the homeless children in our own country, or the lack of education, which is exactly what leads to this kind of debate?
I didn't think much of the divorce and the rumours simply because things were trickling to me 3rd and 4th hand, and it's really not good practice to dig into hearsay, especially if you don't have that right kind of relationship with any of the players.
So here I am, in the middle way, having had twenty years — Twenty years largely wasted, the years of l'entre deux guerres — Trying to learn to use words, and every attempt Is a wholly new start, and a different kind of failure Because one has only learnt to get the better of words For the thing one no longer has to say, or the way in which One is no longer disposed to say it.
«It makes you wonder like, «If you know a certain song is going to do better because it says a certain thing, but you kind of would rather say it a different way, but you're going to say it this way because you know it's going to do better, what does that do to our spirituality?»
According to the fundies if you live in India or China and you are a kind loving, compassionate person, and you try to make your community a better place out of love for others and because you know it's the right thing to do, if you haven't said those words, you will be going straight to hell.
Actually Jesus says many times His Kingdom is in the Next World, that is were he has most of his powers... While Jesus had powers to heal and do amazing things in this world, His real powers were in the next world... Maybe that is why innocent people die horrible deaths in this world... because in the next world things will be different... That one's death in this world, kind, or horrible, the next world is better...
It is a good view to have, because, as your cartoon indicates, what we seem to get in our own heads is always something we have to do or something someone else should do, how someone else should conform to some thing that we are able to do, or expect others to believe some kind of non-sense that has popped into our heads.
The menu is pretty small, which I usually find is a good thing, because it means the kitchen is not trying to do a hundred different things; instead they are focused on doing one kind of thing very well, and it usually results in a much better meal.
When I was growing up outside of Detroit there was a company called Sanders and they made the best pre-maybe caramel cake and icing I've ever had in my life... This comes right underneath that... The only thing that I will do differently is I would make the frosting the day before and let it sit out in a cool place at least 24 hours... Because this allows the frosting to stiffen up even more... Putting it on when I did, which was like An hour or so after I made it, it's still kind of went down the sides and onto the plate but when I went back today to get another piece and I pulled it up off the plate and re-frosted it then it stay this time... Thank you so much for this recipe... I'm going to make this as much as I can... I tried to rated 5 stars but it would only let me Rate 4
this is brilliant, because we do not have vanilla almond milk in Spain, we do have almond milk but not with vanilla and I was always jealous of everyone going nuts over the vanilla almond kind... I also have a problem with regular milk and I have also tried to put other nut milks in my coffee and I have to say it's one of the worst things one can experience in the morning... Now I'm using lactose free milk which heats up well and my coffee tastes delicious.
The reason it's so hard to avoid these kinds of food is because the things that make them bad also make them taste good.
I'm kind of obsessed with them (uh, good thing, too, because this recipe makes kiiiinda a shit ton).
«Because [Burns's] food is very inspired by his time at Noma, very refreshing, vegetable, fish - based,» said Jarnit - Bjergsø, «those kind of things just work really well with lighter, funkier beers.
It's a good thing I baked two kinds of cupcakes for his birthday because he surprised me with his choice.
This is the best kind of dressing because it calls for a bunch of things I almost always have on hand: crunchy scallions, soy sauce, mirin, a little lime juice or vinegar for brightness and sambal oelek for kick.
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was Giroud bought to become a super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called super sub.A player like Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him as a super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal as the top club who'd be crying over Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.
Arsene Wenger can must get Ben Yedder as long as he's clinical and can beat his man.I'd take him over Giroud any day and I think if Giroud is put in that Toulouse squad he won't score more goals than Ben Yedder and denying this fact would mean you choose to be blinded.We had better get him quickly.I've said it here time and time again the reason why Arsenal are not winning things with Giroud is because he's not clinical.If you guys were to ever watch his misses in every season by season since he came here you would be shocked at the kind of striker we have.But as usual he's always forgiven and people continually rate him basing it on statistics and forget he's playing for Arsenal with the likes of.......
Because if it plays in the kinds of the players the late Vince Lombardi said: if you believe you ll lose... chances are you will (our players will say things, but i am sure they d have felt better and more confident with a few new players around them...)
But if you think Rui is good enough to fill in adequately for Ghoulam if he's out for any kind of long stretch, you've got another thing coming to you, because he's not.
That is kind of understandable because Lacazette is a rival for Giroud's first team role but all players want to win things as well as play.
if the Ox was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because of his perceived importance to our starting 11, this was an incredibly risky move that could have cost us dearly... imagine if he was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under false pretenses... this kind of behaviour might be less offensive in April, when things are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a point last year, could be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach make business decisions on game day, which has gone on for far too long
Arsenal definitely is one of a kind because we had to wait 8 long years with the same manager before we won another trophy, but I agree 100 % with the article because during that time, we had built a massive new stadium and also lost a lot of our best players, a major stumbling block in this transitional phase — YET Wenger was able to keep us in the top 4 and keep things afloat — a great achievement not many managers would be able to pull off and I really think he deserves our support until his contract expires because let's be honest, things are better than they were 5 years ago.
That's kind of a good thing though, because this onboard footage of his overtakes pretty much speaks for itself.
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
I don't mean to pick on Goold or Hummel (well, Goold, anyway), because this kind of thing happens all the time.
If you are an Arsenal fan and you really claim to want Arsenal to succeed, better check yourself first and determine what kind of fan you are because one thing is for sure.
We support this kind of running not even so much for the promotion but because it's a good thing to be doing.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
They can double team, but that opens up all kinds of other things because Horford and Monroe both are very good passers.
I think the court that WCT has now is the best ever, because, among other things, it does away with those kinds of inequities.»
The thing is, though, when you line up all of those names and think about who Juve is most likely to sign — and I guess we can throw Can out of the mix right now because we have no clue as to where he wants to go right now — we have another question pop into our head: Are Cristante and Pelegrini the kind of midfielders that can truly make Juventus better?
It's confusing for a lot of people, because there are people that breastfeed their kids and feed them regular foods, and never get a single cavity, but their bacterial loads might be pretty low as a family and they're practicing good hygiene, a good diet and those kinds of things.
But know she tells folks look, that's just what she does so you will even have to deal with it or you know stick your head in the sand because she is going to breastfeed so you might as well get used to it, you know so those kind of things eight years down the line really does help in order for me too, to be able to say «yeah I have three babies» everybody is moving, everybody wants to watch me, watch them entertain, they try to entertain me in some fashion.
My husband keeps saying we should definitely get the 2 - in - 1 because, well, it's a 2 - in - one and I guess men love this kind of thing (I know he does) but I'm not sold on it yet.
KRISTINA CHAMBERLAIN: Well sometimes moms will deal with it more in the first couple of months just while their bodies and babies and still you know figuring out what's the supply and demand is, so, a lot of times after the baby's hit you know the 2 or 3 months mark that starts to get better just because again moms and babies bodies are you know dancing together a little bit better they're getting more in to rhythm, so sometimes that the time and then in itself will kind of resolve it as baby gets bigger and kind of figures that out but if after the 2 months mark it's still an issue when it's making nursing hard for mom and baby I would say then start doing some of the things that we talked about to be a little bit more assertively treating it
So now you've got three girls total, which I think plays into out topic quite well today and talking about reasons to breastfeed because, Christine, I feel like you've kind of experienced a lot of different things having breastfed twins and now a singleton, so I'm really excited to hear what you have to say.
And so, this article doesn't actually say if they got to 100 % but I would imagine that in a flight that long, that people would hear babies cry more than four times, so I'm assuming everybody got a free flight out of this and I'm not sure if it was kind of stage, it's kind of a marketing thing because they're certainly nothing that says that they're going to continue with this and I'm sure they've got a lot of coverage of this, so who knows the anterior mode of fear but it was certainly a good thing for all of the parent.
I just saw the article online and I thought, you know, it's really good for us to hear these kind of stories because this was a completely natural miraculous thing that happened.
I really try to say we have to go back to self - care because by then you know, you kind of have the swing of things - you understand how to breastfeed the baby, baby is happy, mommy is happy and all of sudden you can't just go out with your friends for lunch anymore because the baby is really being demanding, but it is a temporary situation and actually good news.
Who would be in your cabinet?Tony Benn, Barack Obama as a kind of adviser, Bill Clinton and I kind of like Gordon Brown, he has done a lot of good things at an impossible time to be prime minister - and because he's from Fife.
«Unions have come together, particularly in the private sector, because they see this kind of thing happening to them as well, and if we fail, they fail,» Sullivan said.
«But I find it interesting that they weaved into this subpoena the MetLife thing because that's kind of disjointed, for lack of a better word.»
«It is also closer to the Move NY plan than it is to the previous congestion plan... and that is a good thing because we think that the ideas around this issue have developed extensively... of really kind of figuring out what were the weaknesses of that plan from 10 years ago, what issues did it raise for the legislature,» Matthiessen said.
And that's, kind of, the stuff that we've been working on, which is to find things with good properties that don't have a huge amount of embodied energy or depend on really rare materials, because we just can't — you see the volatility in the commodities.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z