Do we need
this kind of rule in Canada?
Not exact matches
We are
in the midst
of reevaluating our lease
rules to provide yellow drivers with this
kind of flexibility.»
The
rules of evidence that apply
in an arbitration fall somewhere between the anything goes «
rules» that apply
in the court
of public opinion and the
rules of evidence that apply
in court which limit what comes
in, generally speaking, to the
kind of evidence experience has shown is trustworthy.
Disney shareholders lost their case but the final
ruling set a new bar for directors when approving these
kinds of exit packages: «If a director acts with conscious disregard —
in other words, a looking away — rather than a deliberate intent to violate his duties, he can still be held liable for acting
in bad faith,» plaintiffs» attorney Steven G. Schullman told the New York Times back
in 2006.
Michael Ferro may want his shareholders to have faith
in his vision
of returning Tribune Publishing to some
kind of halcyon time when newspapers
ruled the media world and spun off millions
in cash flow with virtually no effort.
In the Sept. 5 issue
of Fortune, we imagined a new
kind of fantasy league: one focused on business leaders, where the stats are
ruled more by market cap and earnings per share than on - base percentage and earned run averages.
More research is needed to
rule out this second scenario, but the idea
of being
kind to yourself about occasional lapses
in productivity or self - control — especially if you're the type to beat yourself up for every dip
in productivity — has been endorsed by previous studies.
Backed by Mayor Bill de Blasio, the
rule, believed the first
of its
kind nationally, requires restaurants to post a salt shaker encased
in a black triangle as a warning symbol next to any menu item with more than 2,300 milligrams (0.08 ounce)
of sodium
Outlined
in the documents are
rules about what
kinds of statements are considered too offensive to allow, how much violence the site allows
in videos — including Facebook Live, which has been the subject
of significant controversy recently — and what to do with sexually suggestive imagery.
Companies
of all
kinds are finding ways to put the structures and
rules of games to work
in business.
here's a
kind of proliferation
of conferences where the West
in particular tries to promote its vision
of cyberspace and
rules of behavior for cyberspace, and so this is a competitor to it,» he says.
«Our Ability - to - Repay
rule protects borrowers from the
kinds of risky lending practices that resulted
in so many families losing their homes.
We are monitoring what is happening
in the local marketplaces and we are also affiliating with a number
of other organizations to see what
kind of effect (the
rules) are going to have on the consumer.
Jonas won't
rule any
of these dystopias out, but he believes the third is most likely --» democracy allying itself with a
kind of pseudo-scientific health - worshipping eco-maniacal post-family feminism, culminating
in a whopping tyranny to make autocracy, or even oriental despotism, look like a Boy Scout jamboree.»
The way he sees it, The Globe and Mail's Barrie McKenna and Brent Jang reported, markets have reacted to the changes
in mortgage
rules «
in a way which has
in effect engineered a soft landing, a much more comfortable
kind of situation.»
The Volcker
rule, finalized three years after the Dodd - Frank financial reform law passed
in the wake
of the 2007 - 2009 financial crisis, restricts U.S. banks from making certain
kinds of speculative transactions on their own account and from investing
in hedge funds.
Well,
in any event, here are the «simple
kind of rules» using Fidelity Select Sector funds:
These corporations have
rules and requirements for the
kinds of loans they can buy, and those guidelines can
in turn affect home buyers and mortgage shoppers
in the primary market.
In a groundbreaking announcement, the SEC in the United States has ruled that digital tokens of all kinds will now be considered as financial securitie
In a groundbreaking announcement, the SEC
in the United States has ruled that digital tokens of all kinds will now be considered as financial securitie
in the United States has
ruled that digital tokens
of all
kinds will now be considered as financial securities.
Erlend: Yeah
of course and when you do them on a daily basis, you using the power
of compounding as well, so yes, you get trained, you get like a bit
rule about it and I found the same
in my life it is like sort
of habits, like
in grading habits into my life that are positive and when I started doing it, I
kind of found that oh shit like if I am the way, wait a minute, if I want to do all these habits, I will not have any time for any
of the negative stuff that's
kind of.
The treatment
of the Nazi period
in all its aspects - Hitler's rise to power; his establishment
of a dictatorship
in Germany; the abolition
of the
rule of law; the persecution
of all
kinds of political opponents; the racially motivated persecution
of the Jews, culminating
in the Holocaust; the reticence and opposition
of German citizens; and, Germany's instigation
of World War II - is compulsory teaching matter at all types
of schools
in Germany and at all levels
of education.
If wisdom is to be ours, it must grow
in us slowly like a tree — a tree
of life — and at the end
of the long growing we have its ripe fruit, sweet to the taste, which is the knowledge
of good and evil — the
kind of knowledge by which a king may
rule well, and any
of us may govern our lives well.
@Observer... «While logic and all the
rules of science and math offer a strong rebuttal to the God
in the Bible, there's still the possibility that another nicer,
kinder, more caring, less vain, and less brutal God could exist.»
In difficult cases one asks not (for instance) whether the
rule against murder has exceptions but whether this
kind of case counts as murder - a question
of analogical judgment.
What other
kind of logic would you expect from people like Charlie, who believe
in a big man
in the sky who makes the
rules?
You don't need to believe
in a certain God and follow all the rituals and
rules to still want to be a part
of some
kind of community that shares your morals and values.
Ethics are the
rules which we create to live together
in some
kind of harmony.
In a world where leaders
of all
kinds often fall from grace after a secret personal indiscretion comes to light, could it be that guidelines like the Billy Graham
rule actually preserve a leader's platform and hold him or her accountable to their constituencies?
Whether Rama or Ravana
ruled, whatever political authority structures came into being or disappeared, they had but minimum impact on the life
of the various village communities; they continued to live
in some
kind of internal self - sufficiency according to their different traditions, with Custom as the real King.
Parents need help
in adjusting relationships and family rules as children grow older so they can experience the freedom and the responsibility they need in order to grow up.4 In some congregations, this kind of learning and support occurs in parent - education groups
in adjusting relationships and family
rules as children grow older so they can experience the freedom and the responsibility they need
in order to grow up.4 In some congregations, this kind of learning and support occurs in parent - education groups
in order to grow up.4
In some congregations, this kind of learning and support occurs in parent - education groups
In some congregations, this
kind of learning and support occurs
in parent - education groups
in parent - education groups.5
The
kind of rule God has
in mind is not a «masculine»
rule, but a masculine plus feminine, male plus female,
rule.
The corner stone
of ALL religions is also the ONLY religious principle that I was taught in the «business ethics» class I took in college... Put simply, if everyone did their very best to follow the «the golden rule» (i.e. due unto others as you would have them do unto you) in everything they do, WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER SOCIETY TODAY EVEN WITHOUT ORGANIZED RELIGION OF ANY KIN
of ALL religions is also the ONLY religious principle that I was taught
in the «business ethics» class I took
in college... Put simply, if everyone did their very best to follow the «the golden
rule» (i.e. due unto others as you would have them do unto you)
in everything they do, WE WOULD HAVE A BETTER SOCIETY TODAY EVEN WITHOUT ORGANIZED RELIGION
OF ANY KIN
OF ANY
KIND.
Forging this
kind of relationship created such a sense
of trust that when the white police officer who trained me killed a young African - American male
in an incident that was
ruled to be a justifiable shooting
in the mid 90s, there was no finger - pointing between the African - American community and the police department.
In truth, very few people realized then, nor do they realize now, that the kind of capitalism that ruled in the bank fiasco is unsustainabl
In truth, very few people realized then, nor do they realize now, that the
kind of capitalism that
ruled in the bank fiasco is unsustainabl
in the bank fiasco is unsustainable.
There is
in short a way
of appropriating oneness that very effectively
rules out any
kind of diversity, dialectic, or even dialogue, and lends itself, for that purpose, especially to those persons and forces within the community whose power is great enough to sustain their own particular version
of Christian unity.
A mother chastises her child for running near the fire; this
kind of rule making is born out
of love
in the knowledge
of what is best for the child and what will prevent distress.
As Daniel Kirk has noted, «The
kind of rule God has
in mind is not a «masculine»
rule, but a masculine plus feminine, male plus female,
rule.
It rather represents the
rule of the law over the human being as long as he or she doesn't believe
in the Redeemer Jesus, the
kind bridegroom, who kills the bridegroom «law».
The
kind of ethic promoted here by Paul is one which stresses liberation from the law — from those
rules which prevent the maintenance
of a loving community and for a freedom which accommodates differences between a people called to share
in faith and life.
But if the
kind of trust
in God's love and loyalty to its cause that are Christian faith are,
in fact, authorized by ultimate reality
in its meaning for us, the encompassing whole
of reality
in its structure
in itself must be as individual as it is universal, or as universal as it is individual, and hence an exception to the
rule by which individuals and universals are otherwise distinguished.
It fails to pay attention to who is actually observing
rules of war and who is not (an unsurprising failure
in one who thinks that making war on terrorists is simply fighting «one
kind of terror with another,» an astonishingly imprecise analysis).
I think most people nowadays reject religion
in any form because they don't want to have
rules of any
kind whatsoever
in their life, and I find that sad and worrisome for the future
of we as human beings.
God has made Him the one Lord and the Messiah.12 He will abolish every
kind of domination, authority and power and He is destined to reign until God has put all enemies under His feet.13 He is enthroned at God's right hand
in the heavenly realms, «far above all
rule and authority and power and dominion, and every name that is named, not only
in this age but also
in that which is to come».14 Kasemann went on:
What one needs is an all - inclusive logic — a «grand logic,»
in Peirce's phrase —
in which the positive achievements
of these various alternative logics can be accommodated without having to pay the high, inflationary prices they usually demand: excessive ontic commitment and involvement, «fuzzy» semantics, excessive and perhaps unsound or at least dubious axioms and
rules, and failure to achieve the
kind of «maximum logical candor» that should be aimed at.
The answer is always revelatory, which is one
of the reasons Chesterton was right to say that «the simple need for some
kind of ideal world
in which fictitious persons play an unhampered part is infinitely deeper and older than the
rules of good art, and much more important.»
The Roman Canon Law, still
in force, had all sorts
of superstitious regulations about the consecrated bread, that it was not to be touched by anyone other than a priest, that if one
of the breads was dropped various purificatory
rules had to be performed; now instead
of simply lifting the
rules, on the contrary, they almost compel everyone to touch the Sacrament, with a
kind of compulsive hysteria, as far removed from the Gospel as the Roman
rules themselves, though
in the opposite direction.
Atheists say «that looks like a random act
of horrific violence, congruent with a godless universe» and Christians say «hmm, that does look like a random act
of horrific violence congruent with a godless universe... I guess that
kind of thing just happens sometimes
in a universe
ruled by God.»
The invaders were called Amorites («Westerners») and for centuries they dominated the life
of the Fertile Crescent, with city - states firmly established at such sites as Haran (from whence came Abraham, 11:31), Ugarit, Mari, and Babylon, which was
ruled in the decades around 1700 by the renowned Hammurabi, Ugarit and Mari, among other ancient sites, have yielded profuse contemporary information
of several
kinds.
Contrast this with the genuine church teaching
of Pius XII: «This anti-Christian hedonism... promotes the desire to render always more intense thepleasure
in the preparation and actualisation of the conjugal union, as if in matrimonial relations the whole moral law could be reduced to the regular accomplishment of the act itself, and as if all the rest, in whatever manner done, remains justified by the effusion of mutual affection, sanctified by the sacrament of marriage...» [11] In fact, it would be hard to distinguish Popcak's «One Rule for Infallible Lovers» from the kind of reduction described by the Pop
in the preparation and actualisation
of the conjugal union, as if
in matrimonial relations the whole moral law could be reduced to the regular accomplishment of the act itself, and as if all the rest, in whatever manner done, remains justified by the effusion of mutual affection, sanctified by the sacrament of marriage...» [11] In fact, it would be hard to distinguish Popcak's «One Rule for Infallible Lovers» from the kind of reduction described by the Pop
in matrimonial relations the whole moral law could be reduced to the regular accomplishment
of the act itself, and as if all the rest,
in whatever manner done, remains justified by the effusion of mutual affection, sanctified by the sacrament of marriage...» [11] In fact, it would be hard to distinguish Popcak's «One Rule for Infallible Lovers» from the kind of reduction described by the Pop
in whatever manner done, remains justified by the effusion
of mutual affection, sanctified by the sacrament
of marriage...» [11]
In fact, it would be hard to distinguish Popcak's «One Rule for Infallible Lovers» from the kind of reduction described by the Pop
In fact, it would be hard to distinguish Popcak's «One
Rule for Infallible Lovers» from the
kind of reduction described by the Pope.
It may be
in a church that is willing to accept all
kinds of people, as long as they play by the
rules of the right
kind of people.