That's the only
kind of albedo - modification geoengineering I could countenance, and by the time that is needed, presumably we'll have the wisdom to deploy it safely and the technology to make it robust.
Of many different
kinds of albedo, I am most interested in one that measures the fraction of insolation that is not being absorbed.
Not exact matches
We talk through some
of the most pressing issues in modern climate science: our chances
of staying below 1.5 °C
of warming without climate engineering, climate engineering with land - based
albedo modifications, and the
kinds of societal transformations needed for radical mitigation.
These models all suggest potentially serious limitations for this
kind of study: UVic does not simulate the atmospheric feedbacks that determine climate sensitivity in more realistic models, but rather fixes the atmospheric part
of the climate sensitivity as a prescribed model parameter (surface
albedo, however, is internally computed).
eg how big is the «expected» impact on the climate / temps etc from that
kind of change / feedback in ASI
albedo
The ambiguity over the definition
of ice - free is not really important as far as the strong
albedo feedbacks magnifying the warming
of the region, so is
kind of a red herring in the discussion.
Is climate science making this
kind of error, and not knowing they are making this
kind of error
of simply using too many approximations
of real world variables (
albedos, transmission losses, cloud reflections, and everything else) that are NOT simple one - point constants?
The ethical and political difficulties deepen when we get to the other
kind of geoengineering scheme reviewed in the NRC report, «
albedo modification» — formerly known as solar radiation management — schemes to reduce the amount
of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface.
My own view is that the initiating mechanism is not small shifts in insolation hitting some
kind of trigger related to snow
albedo (the land - sea snow - ice area is relatively small compared to potential shifts in cloud amount and spatial distribution)-- rather it is shifts in global winds which likely relate to shifts in the jetstream (linked to...?
In the paper I argue that the record
of this
kind of aurora can be considered a proxy for the electric properties
of the atmosphere which then influence the cloud cover and the
albedo and, consequently, causes similar cycles in the surface temperature.
Judith I spent a large chunk
of yesterday trying to find some
kind of figure for ice
albedo feedback.