Sentences with phrase «kind of attitude in»

Remember that a sales manager should be competitive in nature so your resume must showcase that kind of attitude in a professional manner.

I dislike that kind of attitude in engineering programs.

Kirabo correctly intuited that these were reflections of a certain kind of attitude in students, and that the students who did better in those dimensions would be the ones who were engaged and motivated.

«We're always trying to build that kind of attitude in our players internally so that we don't have those issues.»

Not exact matches

When Eric Gales emigrated to Canada from the U.K. in 2006 to take the job of VP Microsoft Canada he brought with him not just self - made management skills, but the kind of risk - taking attitude sorely lacking in Canadian business culture.

Speaking at the Fast Company Innovation Festival in New York City on Thursday, the entrepreneur revealed the kind of attitude Under Armour won't tolerate from workers.

While those kinds of stories are the ones many people will think of when they hear the name, however, Gawker also used its take - no - prisoners attitude to break some truly significant news stories, stories that in many cases were ultimately picked up by the mainstream media.

Whether knowingly or not, Chotiner's piece is a perfect example of the kind of attitude Spayd mentions in her column, where she notes that many journalists «have a reflexive aversion to interacting with readers.»

No one can know what the attitude of the new US administration will be to funding foreign assistance of any kind or to global cooperation in the health area.

If you read the sentence, the words — who the child in the mother's womb will be — mean what his / her life will lead him / her into becoming which kind of human, that is, what kind of temperament, attitudes, talents & gifts, and such that human will have.

This passage, which is about proper attitude and decorum in church, though it may have a vague implicit reference to the sensual kind of modesty, is actually very explicitly referring to a materialistic kind of modesty.

Stephen Toulmin echoes these sentiments in an elegant statement on the cosmos understood on the model of our «home»: «We can do our best to build up a conception of the «overall scheme of things» which draws as heavily as it can on the results of scientific study, informed by a genuine piety in all its attitudes toward creatures of other kinds: a piety that goes beyond the consideration of their usefulness to Humanity as instructions for the fulfillment of human ends.

He stresses that «nobody in their right mind would want to see in this country the kind of inhumanity that's sometimes been associated with the practice of the law in some Islamic states; the extreme punishments, the attitudes to women as well».

His attitude was proper, granted his presuppositions, and, without the kind of legalism his presuppositions represent, the conduct of human affairs and the regular business of living in family or community would rapidly become impossible.

'» (90) The prevailing attitude, he shows, is heavily influenced by the Platonic concept of an evil material world and a perfect immaterial soul, as well as a misunderstanding of Scripture in which heaven, (as a kind of final resting place for the soul), is emphasized over the clear biblical picture of a new heaven and new earth for which believers will be physically resurrected.

Since the Bible does not change, and the pulpit changes only aesthetically, that would have meant describing one or another kind of distorted attitude in preachers.

Denouncing as sentimentality the attitude of being always ready to understand but not to judge, they proceed to describe a kind of Protestant moralism that weighs in heavily on the side of judgment in the gospel balance between grace and judgment.

While it is to be doubted that this kind of activity has much effect with the more determined bigots, such dialogue is probably useful in reinforcing tolerant attitudes among those already disposed to have them.

About attitudes Wojtyla writes that they are a kind of «taking up a position» or «a being ready to act» in accordance with faith.

In any kind of preaching, we should be aware of the values and attitudes of those who are listening.

The secret to that kind of attitude lay in their commitment to the Lord first, then to their leaders, including Paul.

That kind of attitude just undermines the importance of parents in a child's life.»

The relationship presupposes a personal kind of activity and attitude that will be expressed in various ways but never through sheer force or coercion exercised by one upon the other.

It is a symbolic way of talking about attitudes and values of actual persons who have been caught up in devotion to one in relation to whom they have found a new and ultimately satisfying kind of life.

In this time of cultural confusion about the meaning of family life, the world needs to see the kind of attitudes Christians can bring to their family relationships and responsibilities.

I am impressed, however, that at my own seminary the best attitude - changer in this regard is actual experience, under competent supervision, in some kind of church situation.

This new attitude produced the kind of church most of us have grown up in.

Such an exercise is also important not because it involves some kind of antiquarian interest devoid of contemporary relevance but because it is something which ought to be undertaken in coming to terms with attitudes and responses to the «role» of women in the church today.

A further difficulty arises from the attitude of the Eastern Church, which recognized the primacy of the Roman Church and its bishop, but not the kind of primacy claimed and accepted in the West.

The first sort of irresponsibility is the kind which appears in the «public - bedamned» attitude once explicitly adopted by some great corporations and still somewhat in vogue, as when great manufacturing or financial concerns resist the right of the public to be given an accounting for human and monetary values.

According to the Christian witness, faith is the kind of basic human attitude or disposition that can be formally characterized as an existential self - understanding, or understanding of our own existence, in relation to others and to the encompassing whole of ultimate reality.

Vocabularies are exhausted and languages altered in the attempt to praise him enough; death is looked on as gain if it attract his grateful notice; and the personal attitude of being his devotee becomes what one might almost call a new and exalted kind of professional specialty within the tribe.

But I think that the lack of female leadership and influence in evangelicalism has resulted in a blind spot that keeps some from recognizing just how painful and damaging these kinds of words and attitudes can be.

These kinds of residents are more difficult to evict in Chicago because of the attitude of the courts.

The hardest part is simple faithfulness in our work and in our attitudes — the kind of faithfulness that shows we are being drawn forward by the magnet force of the kingdom of God.

This is the distinguished seventh - century prophet Zephaniah, who pictured Yahweh as a kind of sinister Diogenes, holding aloft a lamp and searching out in Jerusalem all who, like coagulated wine, have «thickened on their lees,» lost all their covenant sensibilities, and whose attitude toward Yahweh is the ultimate denial of prophetic Yahwism «Yahweh will not do good, nor will he do ill» (1:12).

But the real changes in popular attitudes toward Catholicism happened more slowly, as Catholic Church leaders and scholars engaged in a new kind of dialogue with each other and representatives of other faith groups, most dramatically at the Second Vatican Council during the early years of the 1960s.

Reading the thread on this article and I noticed a lot of people naming strikers we could have gotten in past transfer windows that have gone to other club and failed, Balotelli, Falcao, Martinez, Boney etc are recurring names in all the comments, and am sat here thinking because they failed in thee clubs does not necessarily mean they would have failed if we had pulled out our fingers and hot them back then, Balotelli aside I strongly believe all of these players could have made a difference playing infront of our midfield and given the kind of attention and care Wenger gives Giroud and Walcott, adapting our play to suit them and giving them chances after chances even when its blatantly obvious they are average players so please lets not keep using that as an excuse for Wenger's ultra careful attitude in the transfer market, they could have failed with us, or they could have been massive for us, all speculations.

It remains to be seen what kind of punishment the club might take against the player for such unprofessional attitude in a game where he was up against youth - team players.

Two wins from the past nine league games is no kind of reaction to this crucial period, nor the form to back up Wenger's claims, repeated in the aftermath of defeat, about «great spirit» and «a strong attitude» within the camp.

Speaking from experience with fraternities during my time at Cuse («01 -» 05), this kind of behavior, while reprehensible, this attitude of machismo, was prevalent all throughout Greek Row, not just in the «engineering» frat.

It also sort of turned me into a competitive monster — not the kind that yells profanities at strangers in online multiplayer, but Kart did give me a focused, single - minded attitude that eventually no longer had an outlet in sports.

It doesn't really matter — if we keep putting on such a spineless display as we put on against West Brom (AS7 excluded, the kind of player who we are in desperate need of, with the attitude we desperately need and should be moving heaven and earth to retain), the opposition could turn up on crutches, and we'd still lose.

We need that kind of attitude right now in our management.

Depends on signings, injuries and making sure we show up with the right attitude for the overwhelming majority of our matches, as well as flexibility in how we approach and play games against different kinds of opposition.

Clarence Newton, assistant football coach and phys ed teacher at YCHS, awards him a kind of superstatus: «A boy with the talents and attitudes of a Mike Peterson might come along once in a man's coaching career — but more likely never at all.»

That's the kind of attitude we need in football.

We need more than one or 2 mate, and we also need a clearout.Its this kind of complacent attitude that has stopped us challenging for major trophies for the last 10 years.Look at how Chelsea have handled business, we need to follow suit an clear out the deadwood (Arteta, Flamini, Diaby etc) an bring in players lie Henry was saying.In football like in life you don't get anywhere unless you have that thirst for more, people like you Wenger and the board have lost that thirst, thats why the Champions League trophy is as far away as ever.

Kind of echo my attitude to officiating in the premier league.

That is the exact kind of attitude which would aide Liverpool's tendency to shoot itself in the foot.