I think anybody who is asked that question... it would
kind of be false if I said, no, I can't think of anything else.
Not exact matches
The risk with that
kind of approach
is that obvious falsehoods or offensive views get treated as though they
were valid through a
false attempt at balance.
The worst
kinds of false news aren't even the most obvious
kinds — the clear fakes or ridiculous assertions — the Microsoft researcher and former fellow at Harvard's Berkman Center says:
Alex Stamos, Facebook's chief security officer, said in the briefing that the company
was concerned not only about
false facts but also other
kinds of fakery.
If not, there
's no basis for conviction,
kind of like placing doctors on trial for selling «
false hope»,
of which there
's no such thing.
-- you do not want to embarrass yourself by admitting any
kind of statement that MAY
BE FALSE.
If you believe your belief
is falsifiable, tell me what
kind of scientific study I can do to prove your god
false.
He isn't mighty enough to leave any
kind of verifyable trace, and the stories in the bible that claim he did this and that
are clearly
false, so which god do you mean?
The philosophy back
of this
kind of thing may
be sincere but its sincerity does not save it from
being false.
You have every right to «believe» whatever you wish, but claiming your «faith» to
be some
kind of «fact» or «proof»
is blatantly
false and quite dishonest!
They can «study» their religion, but it still comes down to faith in the teachings, and personal experience, neither
of which can ever
be meaningfully tested true or
false in any
kind of objective way.
«It
's not about same - gender relations — it
is about se.xual idolatry and worshipping
false gods» ---------- It does refer to certain
kinds of idolatry, sure, but you have to remember, all sin
is idolatry, therefore when using the word ar.senokoitai, it refers to the idolatry (sinful act)
of same gender s.ex.
Short cuts,
of the
kind that Concept Art peddles,
are based on the banal and
false conclusion that the development
of the productive forces renders all work superfluous.
Instead
of such an open challenge, this temptation
is a much more subtle
kind of stress that encourages its victims to make their own
false moves so that in the end they destroy themselves.
Third, the Internet provides unprecedented access to at least as much
false information as it does accurate information, and none
of it
is subjected to any
kind of objective validation.
I find that 99 %
of those who call this
kind of post or writer
false prophets
are usually the ones who didn't really study or understand the word.
I get that someone who has messed up their marriage might
be your friend and ministry associate, and that you might want to give them the benefit
of the doubt and believe them... But when they invent a
false doctrine
of spiritual versus legal marriage, surely some
kind of red flag has to go up?
Others
were groping down
false paths toward the reform
of an institutional Church that, for all its integration with culture and society,
was becoming evangelically flaccid and sluggish, perhaps in the complacent conviction (not unlike that
of the recent past) that the faith could
be transmitted by cultural osmosis, as a
kind of ethnic heritage.
Where authentic religion
is absent, we do not find happy rationalists but rather
false religions, superstitions, addictions
of one
kind or another — and despair.
We want to
be firmly planted in the Word, like a tree by streams
of living water, that bears fruit in season, it
's leaves don't whither in the drought, it doesn't blow over with all
kinds of trends and
false teachings, it
is there through thick and thin, when the sun
is shining and the rain
is pouring, that
is the
kind of church we want to
be.»
this
is the
kind of false prophets that gives any religion a bad name.
But more important
are the changing patterns and attitudes
of campus life, the enormously increased and still increasing numbers
of young people who
are on campuses, and the various
kinds of movements that combine to make young people think
of religion and the church as
false, traditional, or irrelevant.
Who can you fellowship with, what
is this fellowship,
is there a real and
false type
of fellowship, and what
kind of fellowship does Jesus and Paul refer when they speak in the NT?
These
kinds of teachings like the one you have here
is having
false converts never find out that they
are not really in the faith!
It
is the
kind of ignorance that perceives the partial and proclaims it to
be the whole; that
is unaware
of its own subjectivity and therefore makes and repeats
false and prejudicial assumptions; that can not separate the truth
of experience from the interpretation
of that experience.
Consequently the
kind of history and biography attempted unsuccessfully for Jesus by the nineteenth century
is now seen to
be based upon a
false understanding
of the nature
of history and the self.
Although Mormons
are usually friendly, loving, and
kind people, they
are deceived by a
false religion that distorts the nature
of God, the Person
of Jesus Christ, and the means
of salvation.
When we remember that there
are two
kinds of forgiveness, one which
is unconditional and freely given to all, and the other which grants release and deliverance from the enslaving power
of sin, we see that this idea that God does not forgive ongoing adultery
is false.
But as this unmaking
of religion reveals that religion
is «true», in the sense that it
is an invention
of human
beings to compensate for and to sublimate their real wretchedness, a second
kind of criticism has to follow: religion has to
be made
false, i.e., the secular world has to
be changed.
With your
kind of hermeneutic, you will
be able to prove whatever you want and that
's a recipe for
false doctrine not to mention disaster.
The alleged subordination
of the gospel to Karl Marx
is illustrated, for example, by charging that «
false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected biblical texts that
are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other
kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom
of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel
is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting
of the reality
of personal sin; that everything
is reduced to praxis (the interplay
of action and reflection) as the only criterion
of faith, so that the notion
of truth
is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
Niebuhr's statement implies no relativism, in which somehow everything
is true, but rather a
kind of believing agnosticism, in which there
is no claim to know what else
is true or
false besides one's own belief.
They
were familiar with the fact
of deception, both
of the ordinary sort, where some malicious individual presents as truth what actually
is false, and
of the more insidious
kind referred to just now that
was attributed to the interference
of an unfriendly spirit.
One
is a
false kind of objectivity that views the world, language, and interpretation as fixed (Brueggemann).
Of similar implication was the violent disagreement through the eighth and seventh centuries within the ranks of the prophets themselves, the canonical prophets denouncing their popular colleagues for false leadership, and the latter retorting in kin
Of similar implication
was the violent disagreement through the eighth and seventh centuries within the ranks
of the prophets themselves, the canonical prophets denouncing their popular colleagues for false leadership, and the latter retorting in kin
of the prophets themselves, the canonical prophets denouncing their popular colleagues for
false leadership, and the latter retorting in
kind.
There
were others who had to
be refuted as
false teachers for saying that the resurrection had already taken place.21 The New Testament Apocalypse represented still another
kind of development, though one more in keeping with the earlier Jewish eschatology.
Otherwise the dialectical answer would either
be merely a shoddy compromise
of a verbal
kind and ultimately
false, or man would not
be truly one but an adventitious assemblage
of independent realities which themselves in that case could
of course
be of quite different origins.
False accusers will
be ashamed on Judgment Day along with other
kind of villains.
But that crude caricature
of religious belief and moral conviction
is false; it
's adolescent, if not downright childish; it inevitably lends itself to the
kind of vulgarity that intends to wound, not amuse; and over the long haul, it
's as corrosive
of the foundations
of a decent society as the demented rage
of the jihadists who murdered members
of Charlie Hebdo
's staff.
He recognizes that the conflict today
is not between matter and spirit, but between two
kinds of spirit; not between prose and imagination, but between a true and
false imagination; not even, finally, between ugliness and beauty, because what some would call beauty and ideality can not save.
In Newman's view, validating a
false sense
of the conscience would
be a
kind of pastoral negligence; it would rob the believer an opportunity to hear the voice
of God.
But our minds have
been unaware
of this fact when educated to live in a competetive society where authorities
are creating all
kinds of separation and
false values.The freedom to
be creators
of our lives comes with self - knowledge.
This view entails that there can
be no formal criteria or external signs — such as a historical succession
of office - bearers, or some other
kind of institutional continuity — for distinguishing true «subordinate authorities» from
false ones.
For such people metaphor not only promises more than it can deliver, but its promises
are too often grounded on
false consciousness, so that a loss
of faith in it
is the beginning
of wisdom — perhaps the philosopher Richard Rorty's discovery (bad news for Haeckel and his
kind) that out there there
is really no «out there.»
They don't define me — that would
be a
false identification; the wrong
kind of empty.
My advise
is to pray that those who
are moving in that
kind of deception and
false authority would have the eyes
of their understanding enlightened to the gospel
of grace and the Father heart
of God.
That
is certainly true, but it
is equally true that Francis» understanding
of mercy
is not the
kind dissenters and secularists believe in, much less the
kind of false compassion Venerable Fulton Sheen powerfully exposed and answered.
It
is a recurring and terrifying trope
of such matters that «the real problem
is false allegations
of racism, rather than racism» (see also: every other
kind of discrimination, rape), and so to equate a lack
of proof with falsehood.
The Brazilian
's second
was a thing
of beauty, but his first actually impressed us just as much — that
's the
kind of goal he needs to score more when playing as a
false - 9.
if the Ox
was played to either showcase his skills or to increase any potential bids because
of his perceived importance to our starting 11, this
was an incredibly risky move that could have cost us dearly... imagine if he
was injured or played poorly, like he did, and this negatively impacted our ability to get the best available deal... more importantly, why
was Wenger willing to play someone who obviously wants out in such an important game under
false pretenses... this
kind of behaviour might
be less offensive in April, when things
are done and dusted, but to do this following a loss against a supposed main rival that pipped us for fourth by a point last year, could
be considered at best inappropriate and at worst treasonous... we can't afford to let this coach make business decisions on game day, which has gone on for far too long