Sentences with phrase «kind of child custody»

However, many don't realize that physical custody is not the only kind of child custody arrangement available.

Florida law establishes two kinds of child custody: legal and physical.

Not exact matches

Add the fact that mothers are almost always assigned primary custody of minor children and that child support is not mandated in almost 40 percent of all settlements and in any case is often irregularly or never paid, and you have a recipe for all kinds of trouble.

Child custody disputes can be among the most contentious and complicated kinds of legal situations a person can face, while the emotional toll of these disputes can make it difficult to focus on the technical aspects of your case.

«I think anyone facing a life - altering judgment — whether it's incarceration, eviction, deportation, loss of custody of your children, foreclosure on a mortgage you have — anyone facing those kinds of judgements should have representation, in my opinion,» City Councilman Mark Levine told the Observer.

However, there is no prenuptial agreement of any kind that parties can enter into that is going to be binding on a court when it comes to issues relating to custody, visitation or child support for minor children.

This kind of separation agreement could settle terms of spousal support where appropriate, as well as child support and custody to some extent, although child support and custody agreements are subject to the approval of the court.

The rebuttable presumption means that unless the abusive parent proves otherwise, the court will find that it's in the best interests of the child for the perpetrator parent not to have sole custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody of any kind.

Judges make all kinds of decisions, from the very personal, such as child custody decisions, to those with much broader impact.

We provide this resource because judges make all kinds of decisions, from the very personal, such as child custody decisions, to those with much broader impact.

In another example of the kinds of difficult questions that Family Law judges have to grapple with, a recent Ontario case involved a father of a child who wanted custody, despite having been arrested in a methamphetamine sting, and despite what the court called his «obvious pride» at being good at the «craft» of running a marijuana - growing operation in his basement.

The Provincial Court declined to do this and noted that this essentially amounted to an order for custody and access regarding the dog, which it found it did not have jurisdiction to do as these kinds of orders apply to children and not pets.

The court will decide these kinds of custody and access issues by considering the «best interests» of the children and in most cases it will be found to be in the children's interests to be allowed to go on a vacation with either spouse.

The requirements are somewhat different depending on which kind of custody you want to change, but both are based on the best interests of the children.

A parent who does not have joint or sole legal custody of his child can make these kinds of decisions without consulting the other parent while his child is visiting with him.

At our Austin divorce firm, we work diligently to assist clients in family law matters of all kinds, including issues of child custody, visitation, support, parental rights, and establishment of primary residence.

Legal custody is the right for a parent or guardian to make decisions about how the child is raised, for example, the kind of education the child receives, the religion he or she has, and the health care he or she receives.

Instead of «custody,» which might imply ownership of some kind, Texas law uses the word «conservatorship» to describe the post-divorce parent / child relationship.

This kind of stipulation is included in custody agreements in an attempt to allow the non-custodial parent to continue to foster a relationship with their child.

In the first study of its kind to issue each state a grade, A through F, on how well child custody statutes encourage shared parenting and parental equality, Ohio received a C -.

This flexible rule allows the court to consider all the relevant evidence and circumstances of the case to figure out what kind of custody arrangement is best for the child.

Mother then believes that dad is again abusing child and she contacts CPS, separates from dad and again there is a period of about 8 months without contact... I have found absolutely no evidence of any kind of abuse (except mom's undying belief about abuse occurring... Other than, getting the child a new therapist, a new school, what kind of recommendations regarding custody time with dad or even possible custody change.

If you are unable to agree, then the judge will have to decide what is in the best interest of the child when deciding what kind of custody and visitation to order.

There are two kinds of legal custody for a minor child; joint legal custody and sole legal custody.

Martha Jacobson felt that the father should have joint custody, even though he had not asked for it, and even though she knew that he was planning to move 40 miles away to the next county right after the divorce, which would pose logistical problems with this kind of arrangement for a child in preschool or kindergarten.

In all cases, my goal is to minimize the total costs to a client, and to set out a framework in the initial meeting as to what kinds of legal costs might be expected, balanced with the need for an expert such as a GAL in a child custody case or accountant in a case with valuation issues.

We have read many a mis - guided and ill informed custody evaluation where the seriously enmeshed relationship between the alienated child and the alienating parent is described as being «very close» implying that this kind of closeness is healthy.

Legal custody entails the responsibility of a parent to make major decisions for a child that would affect their life, such as what kind of medical care they will receive or where they will go to school.

Sole legal custody means that, again, only one parent is has the legal right to make important decisions regarding the child's life such as where they will attend school or what kind of health care they will receive.

Based on this specious and sadistic custody evaluation, which Father then distributed widely to third parties, such as the child's school, the Father then filed a series of repetitive «emergency motions» over the ensuing months claiming severe parental alienation, and all kinds of sick and disturbed behaviors by the child when she was with him (behaviors that occurred nowhere else).

These so - called findings in fact were based on no personal observations of anything that would tie the child's behaviors in the presence of the Father (which otherwise would look like some kind of abuse by the Father) to the Mother as causative agent; rather, their conclusions were based on Martha Jacobson's baseless speculations [note] in the custody evaluation report.

In divorce and child custody cases, the contested issues vary depending on the parties» unique circumstances, but generally they concern with whom the children will reside (physical custody), who will make decisions concerning their religious and educational upbringing, medical care and treatment, and extracurricular activities (legal custody), how the assets and debts of the parties will be divided (equitable division of the marital property), and what kind of spousal support, if any, is to be paid by one party for the support of the other spouse.

A parent with sole custody has both kinds of custody: Her child lives with her with little or no physical visitation time with his other parent, and she has full decision - making authority without input from the other parent.

Conversely, even collaboratively - resolved family law cases (just as for family law cases resolved by mediation or settlement alone) can find their way back into court years later for future disputes involving child support and child custody, inasmuch as these kinds of matters remain open for adjudication during the minority of the child, and there is no guarantee that new disputes will be resolved collaboratively... [The rest of the article is at the collaborative law website HERE.]

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.