What
kind of church did you go to the «enforced» this kind of twisted activities?
The real damage
these kind of churches do, especially to children, is they teach them to live their lives in fear.
So what
kind of church does God attend?
But what
kind of Church does this create?
Our research at the Polis Center leads us to be suspicious of much of what we hear about available resources or
the kinds of churches doing urban ministry.
3) What
kind of church do you go to?
Not exact matches
WHY
do they believe that their God is so concerned about whether or not they listen to musical instruments in
church on Sunday, get dunked or sprinkled in ceremonial water, speak in a tongue as some
kind of sign... to whom ever, read from the correct translation
of some long lost ancient books, etc, etc?
You CAN still reproduce by having relations with memebers
of the opposite gender, that is obvious, what you are missing out on is that to ensure that people didn't prefer same gender relationships over the opposite gender relationships, it was made a sin punishable by death to avoid any
kind possible population reduction from members
of the
church.
The USA is a place that is free from any
kind of religious classification and official religious sponsorship, primarily because the founding fathers didn't want the
church to have control on par with that
of the
church in England.
I don't often hear any
of George Carlin's favorite words in
church, but I sure as hell *
do * hear a lot
of cursing
of people, often in the name
of Christ — exactly the
kind of cursing shown by the men on the left and right in your cartoon.
Real gods don't need
church leaders
of any
kind.
I don't agree with him, but I don't think he's delusional, and I think he's the
kind of believer that all atheists would be pretty comfortable with as opposed to the «the
church is always right» variety.
I
do not attend any
kind of church or social gatherings in regards to my non-religious beliefs.
How
does he feel entitled to make any claim to be a better Catholic than Santorum (for that is what he's implicitly claiming) on questions that the
church rightly leaves to the prudential judgment
of voters and public officials, within broad boundaries, when in the next breath he confesses his complete failure to be any
kind of Catholic at all on a question on which the
church speaks with categorical moral authority?
If these CHRISTians, as they like to be called, just stayed in their
churches, helped the poor, stopped spreading hate — the
kinds of things their boss said they should
do, we wouldn't be bothered as much.
Still, Bonhoeffer's presence at what he called «quite a wonderful Mass»
did bear witness to a
kind of broken unity, a sanctorum communio not yet fully realized in the visible
church of the undivided Christ here and now.
«
Churches actually have an amazing opportunity if they would just turn their minds to it, and many are, and reaching people in the community with the
kind of help that the
Church has always
done in the past.
That
kind of fellowship
does not happen in
churches â $ «and anyone that tells you it
does â $ «hasnâ $ ™ t been to
church long enough.
YOU::: That
kind of fellowship
does not happen in
churches â $ «and anyone that tells you it
does â $ «hasnâ $ ™ t been to
church long enough.
«He just doesn't get that aspect
of theology because
of the
kind of church he grew up in,» my friend commented after a lively theology debate with a mutual friend.
This is not a
church where they typically
do that, but it's
kind of a basic thing.
Because even though the phrase «going to
church» kind of bugs me (we don't go, we are), and even though it's messy and imperfect, even though I've let them down and they have let me down, even though there are disappointments, even though I don't agree with everybody and they probably think I'm crazy sometimes, too, even though I don't think we need an official sanctioned Sunday morning thing to be part of the Body of Christ, because even though I think the Church crosses a lot of our self - made boundaries and preferences and gatekeepers, I keep choosing this small family out of hope an
church»
kind of bugs me (we don't go, we are), and even though it's messy and imperfect, even though I've let them down and they have let me down, even though there are disappointments, even though I don't agree with everybody and they probably think I'm crazy sometimes, too, even though I don't think we need an official sanctioned Sunday morning thing to be part
of the Body
of Christ, because even though I think the
Church crosses a lot of our self - made boundaries and preferences and gatekeepers, I keep choosing this small family out of hope an
Church crosses a lot
of our self - made boundaries and preferences and gatekeepers, I keep choosing this small family out
of hope and joy.
No sooner had I finished my piece for Faith magazine's last issue (in which, my readers may recall, I encouraged Polish Catholics to keep themselves at arms length from the secularised and indifferentist ethos
of many English dioceses) than news emerged that one English bishop at least had
done something to try to address the problem, and that he had in the process aroused the
kind of secularist hostility which is, I strongly suspect, — certainly in this country — the only really reliable sign that the Catholic
Church is being faithful to its vocation.
Jonathan: What
do you think that we can and should
do as Christians in the American
Church to
kind of heal the divides, understand each other and begin to repair the damage that's been
done as a result
of these political conversations.
«These ministers represent the
kind of Christianity that makes me reluctant to say to people I don't know that I'm a Christian, and the
kind of speakers for the faith that drove all my children out
of churches because they would not put up with such judgmentmentalism.
The Institutional
Church (ecclesia) has killed only two
kinds of people: Those who
do not believe in the teachings
of Jesus Christ, and those who
do.
We can also ask: What
kind of leadership
do our
churches need in a world heading for disaster?
For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who
did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent
of all, or that Adam signifies some
kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources
of revealed truth and the acts
of the magisterium
of the
Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).
There are many people who don't care too much what
kind of music a
church plays.
Any real faith (meaning the
kind that actually
does move mountains) died out
of the «Christian
Church» when the Bible was canonized, with little exception, and most
of the exceptions were exterminated.
What
kind of church is it if you don't mind me asking?
And, no, I'm not a sneaky, prissy, telltale
kind of bloke and I don't snitch on people if I hear them saying things I don't think make a
church look good.
I
do believe spiritual abuse is rampant, that systems perpetually pull towards inhumane policies and treatment
of people, and that all
kinds of harmful ideas, attitudes and behaviours run rampant inside systems, including the
church.
For the
church, this
kind of liability insurance has to
do with, say, a pulpit falling on a teen or an elderly woman slipping on ice.
The ABC was
kind enough to send transcripts
of the programs it
did on these giants
of modern Catholicism, so I was able to read what others had to say about the
Church's two newest saints.
David
does a lot
of good work on this blog, he is absolutely a compassionate,
kind man... but he also leaves a lot to be desired for those who don't see
church thru his lens or
church experiences.
On the basis
of the First Amendment, as well as the general principles
of the Constitution, he opposed public payment for chaplains in Congress and the military, spoke out against national proclamations
of days
of prayer (though as president he
did «recommend» them) and while president vetoed congressional efforts to incorporate
churches in the District
of Columbia (fullest statement, V: 103 - 105) At the same time, Madison frequently opined that it was appropriate for private citizens to support chaplains and various
kinds of semiorganized public religion through voluntary contributions (V: 104,105)
Of course, he also has admitted to driving his truck through several churches and doing jail time for drunk driving, but that just the kind of guy Jesus chooses as his prophe
Of course, he also has admitted to driving his truck through several
churches and
doing jail time for drunk driving, but that just the
kind of guy Jesus chooses as his prophe
of guy Jesus chooses as his prophet.
Even if you don't specifically believe in God or go to
church every sunday, there is nothing wrong in believing in some
kind of «greater being» that you can rely on and that will guide you down the right path.
I heard more
of their intersecting stories, and when Idelette was
done talking about her book, about her passions, I wanted to see her on every stage
of every slick Christian conference, to bring some mama - truth, to preach the Gospel
of Being With Each Other, but then I
kind of had to shrug because part
of Idelette's power is that she's outside
of that system, outside
of that
church - marketing world, too busy living the truth
of it to package it.
I am sure they were
kind - hearted and loved the Lord deeply, but I wondered if what we were
doing, whether we knew it or not, was worshipping at the altar
of our American - defined ideal
of success, only in the setting
of a local
church.
If the
Church alters laws
of that
kind and to that extent itself changes, it
does so only within the immutability
of a fundamental principle, namely, that the
Church has the right and duty to make changeable regulations for the spiritual good
of its members.
What
kind of job has the
church done addressing those inequalities up until now?
Every clergyperson — bishop, pastor, minister, elder, and deacon — knows what
kinds of concerns reign in
church business meetings, and those concerns
DO NOT focus on «righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit.»
You don't join a
church or
do any
kind of religious works or rituals to be saved.
In response, I wrote and distributed throughout our
church a little pamphlet called «Attending the Church that God Does» explaining that if Jesus were walking planet earth today, ours was the kind of church He would a
church a little pamphlet called «Attending the
Church that God Does» explaining that if Jesus were walking planet earth today, ours was the kind of church He would a
Church that God
Does» explaining that if Jesus were walking planet earth today, ours was the
kind of church He would a
church He would attend.
But if that is
done by the
Church's magisterium, it can only be through propositions which are not themselves absolute dogma but serious and valid items
of knowledge (in varying degrees,
of course, and
of very many different
kinds), but knowledge which in principle is subject to revision and capable
of improvement, and which can be deepened, clarified, given greater discrimination, improved in this or that respect, or even abandoned.
In short, anyone who appreciates the rapid change in historical circumstances and
does not flee from this into a ghetto; anyone who knows that there is and always has been a mutable, human law
of the
Church, and that this
kind of change has always been practised; anyone, moreover, who reflects that the
Church not only has the right but the duty
of shaping its canon law in accordance with changes in the times, will not be surprised at the change in many legal regulations which he is living through at the present time, but will recognize and accept this as a sign
of the vitality
of the
Church and its pastoral care.
I doubt that they'll
do much
of a funeral for him - other than maybe some
kind of ceremony down in their catacombs (
church basement).
We want to be firmly planted in the Word, like a tree by streams
of living water, that bears fruit in season, it's leaves don't whither in the drought, it doesn't blow over with all
kinds of trends and false teachings, it is there through thick and thin, when the sun is shining and the rain is pouring, that is the
kind of church we want to be.»