Not exact matches
Now it may not be, you know, the solution to
climate change but I think that there will be probably some form
of progress made here whether it's an
agreement to
kind of pre-agree on what a treaty might look like or if it's progress on reducing deforestation and other issues that the country seem to be a lot closer to
agreement on.
«One might combine
climate and proliferation concerns with a way
of attaching carbon credits to new nuclear construction in countries that took certain
kinds of agreements around enrichment and reprocessing,» Moniz said.
What
kinds of international
agreements could effectively limit risks related to human - driven global warming, either by blunting human contributions to
climate change or building resilience to hazards related to changing conditions?
David Doniger, the director
of the
climate and clean air program at the Natural Resources Defense Council (and in the past a negotiator in
climate agreements for the United States), said the Paris
climate agreement does allow counting these
kinds of cuts.
Dec. 4, 7:34 p.m. Updated CANCÚN, Mexico — At almost every negotiation in recent years aimed at building a new international
climate agreement, a batch
of delegates and United Nations officials huddle at the end
of the first week to start framing some
kind of text.
Regardless
of what we think about D - O events, I am in complete
agreement with Stefan that there is no evidence
of any
kind at present that the present
climate suffers any
kind of initial - condition sensitivity that would compromise the value
of projections
of response
of statistical quantities to increases in GHG's.
Senior United Nations officials had told me in recent weeks that they were very eager for this
kind of language, in hopes that Francis could help drive an
agreement in
climate treaty negotiations in Paris in December.
The other thing that I think is really important to watch is the possibility
of a
climate deal with China, and that could be really, really important, because you've basically got the two
climate change superpowers finally coming together on this, and if they created some
kind of an
agreement to limit emissions, even that could have the de facto effect
of creating a global carbon price.
It is all about the Paris
Climate Agreement targets and it is
kind of fun to watch.
If the planetary temperatures rise beyond the 1.5 °C to 2 °C limit proposed by the Paris
agreement signed by 197 nations in 2015, then
climate change could arrive in Mali, Niger and Chad in the shape
of intense rains
of the
kind identified as seasonal monsoons.
Paris
climate talks this week descended into madcap all - night negotiations, as delegates desperately tried to salvage some
kind of agreement beyond empty promises to do something sometime about what President Obama insists is the gravest threat to our planet, national security and future generations.
While I am not necessarily in
agreement with all
of your assumptions about
climate change, I am FULLY in support
of your right to engage n the discussion, free from any
kind of censorship / interference by the Gov. LOVE the billboard concept!
But the paradox, and the tragedy, is that the
Climate Summit will not have the cessation
of massive world - wide geoengineering as one
of it's paramount objectives, but will instead dilly - dally endlessly with how to coordinate international carbon reductions with the stated goal
of a signed
agreement, while «mitigation» strategies
of every conceivable
kind will be on the table.
For this to be acceptable (and, indeed, it IS an explanation), we really need to reach some
kind of agreement on WHEN weather becomes
climate.
That
kind of joined - up systems thinking is critical if we're to achieve the UN's 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and the global
agreement to keep
climate change below 1.5 °C
of global warming.
``... What do you do if nations disagree about what
kind of climate they want...» is no more an issue for geoengineering than it is for truly effective Kyoto - like
agreements.
With that
kind of pressure, it's only natural that some would be unsure
of our ability to effect a unanimous international
agreement that would do what absolutely, unequivocally must be done: We must reduce the rate
of global warming, immediately and substantially, in order to curtail the devastating effects
of climate change.
The problem with getting some
kind of global political
agreement is that weather and
climate are local.