Sentences with phrase «kind of climate does»

What kind of climate does it like, etc..?

Not exact matches

It was this period where the larger firms were trying to figure out what to do in this kind of economic climate.

Does quinoa need a special kind of climate to grow?

But one of the things that I have been very impressed by here is a lot of the stories of hope; many folks have traveled a long way to share what they are doing on a very local level to help combat climate change, and that's everything from, kind of, rural electrification in Africa and India, you know, bringing light to people who are still using dung or coal for cooking and heating and dying from indoor air pollution to, you know, major renewable energy projects, say, here in Denmark where they now get 20 percent of their electricity from wind power.

It's a small country, it does not have the, kind of, a presence in the international stage of a China or an India or a Brazil, but it is concerned about the future of its forests and it wants to play in the climate game, that is it wants to participate in any kinds of offsets that might benefit its economy and also its wild areas.

The good news is though that I think he does feel that it is still possible to take some kinds of actions to respond to problems of climate change, to do a better job of trying to conserve top soil, to try to address the problems of water scarcity all over the world and so forth; that we can actually head off a lot of these problems.

«By showing some people that they might be better off than their neighbors... maybe this kind of undermines their motivation to do anything about climate change,» he said.

«Evolutionary biology projects are very disadvantaged in that kind of funding climate because it's very difficult to identify a private - sector funder that would be interested in putting money into a project that doesn't have a clear economic spin off,» he says.

As we discussed recently in connection with climate «forecasting `, the kinds of simulations used in AR4 are all «projections» i.e. runs that attempt to estimate the forced response of the climate to emission changes, but that don't attempt to estimate the trajectory of the unforced «weather».

These models all suggest potentially serious limitations for this kind of study: UVic does not simulate the atmospheric feedbacks that determine climate sensitivity in more realistic models, but rather fixes the atmospheric part of the climate sensitivity as a prescribed model parameter (surface albedo, however, is internally computed).

As a native Arizonan, the summer heat totally doesn't bother Chris or any of his Tucson buddies, and they've completely perfected their style game for this cruel climate, carving out their own unique space in the style - sphere that I'm kind of in love with.

I went ahead and rounded up 9 more gorgeous pink coats below that are perfect for all different kinds of climates, just in case you don't live in a place as cold as Chicago!

It makes the Oscar race kind of a farce, ultimately, because though good movies do win in this climate (Moonlight, for instance, is a great movie), the reasons they seem to win can seem a little bogus when seen through this lense.

In a new post on his Instagram, Dolan says he will not submit his next feature, «The Death and Life of John F. Donovan,» to the festival, partly because it simply won't be done in time, and partly because of the kind of «trolling, bullying and unwarranted hatred» he sees as part of the current critical climate.

Do you see Judge Dredd as a more progressive or classic kind of hero in our recent comic book movie character climate?

To be sure, today's overall funding climate does not have the combination of will and resources to back this kind of work.

While the car is scheduled to have all the features of a standard Accord Tourer — electric tailgate, cruise control, leather steering wheel, heated front seats, MP3 - capable CD player, dual - zone automatic climate control and 16 - inch alloy wheels, to name a lot - it does have some functions that are unique to its kind.

I've been in the automotive industry for over 25 years and the Hyundai has come a loooong way since its inception when i test drove this car i was totally impressed and bought my baby and i'm glad i did I'm a big guy and find it a little cramped on long drives which i do daily the winshield post kind of creates a blind spot the drivers seat could be repositioned needs more leg room the outside mirrors should also be collasable it has great back seat space and plenty of trunk space it drives incredibly well very smooth love the power of v - 6 it seems to have some shifting issues not smooth all times the sound system is great love the heated seats the climate control system lacks some

While I do understand the urge to do it — there is a kind of bragging right you can wave around for owning a car as special as this one — I just can't do it, especially in the political and economic climate we're in today.

Predictable and consistent behavior Prefers human company, especially children Relatively «directable» without training Affectionate Able to be banged around, by kids and clumsy humans Comfortable indoors, and in the climates you live in and take vacations Doesn't require a lot of exercise Calm in the home; not hyperactive Medium high food drive; medium high prey drive (for fetching) Able to take, and learn from, a correction Low initiative Low fearfulness Submissive Low other - dog aggression Quiet; not highly reactive to bark at sights and sounds around the home or in public Image of a guard dog without the actual follow through (if you are into that kind of thing) Easily Housetrained (some breeds are easier than others)

Many of these dogs don't have any kind of shelter protecting them from the freezing climate and indigenous wildlife.

What kind of effect do fires, like the current one in Australia, have on climate.

Let me make a few points of this kind that do not rely on my expertise in climate science but are very relevant.

David Doniger, the director of the climate and clean air program at the Natural Resources Defense Council (and in the past a negotiator in climate agreements for the United States), said the Paris climate agreement does allow counting these kinds of cuts.

As much as possible when addressing the Public, Climate Scientists and others please do stop speaking in numbers, averages, means, and other kinds of figures.

This kind of forecast doesn't depend too much on the models at all — it is mainly related to the climate sensitivity which can be constrained independently of the models (i.e. via paleo - climate data), moderated by the thermal inertia of the oceans and assuming the (very likely) continuation of CO2 emissions at present or accelerated rates.

The two kinds of climate change are sometimes confounded by non-experts — e.g., when it is claimed that DO events represent a much larger and more rapid climate change than anthropogenic global warming.

This debate is about your pocketbook, it's about your job, it's about whether you can still afford health care, whether we're going to do something about climate change or not, what kind of world your kids are going to be living in in ten or fifteen years, how are we going to respond to peak oil, where is the next transistor economy going to come from?

In other words, it is possible that the the climate system does exhibit some kind of long - term chaos in some circumstances, but that the forcing is strong enough to wipe out any significant uncertainty due to initial conditions — at least if one is content to forecast statistical quantities such as, for example, decadal mean January temperatures in some suitably large region, or perhaps temperature variances or quartiles taken over a similar period.

(Personally, I don't see this kind of effort going anywhere unless and until climate impacts trend toward worst - case outcomes.)

Do the like a warm or cold climate or do they have to accept our view what kind of climate they should likDo the like a warm or cold climate or do they have to accept our view what kind of climate they should likdo they have to accept our view what kind of climate they should like?

With an issue like human - caused climate change, or the devastation of ocean - roaming species like bluefin tuna, it seems again that the old kind of framing doesn't work any more.

But I was kind of dismayed that he didn't explore the posts, articles, and book chapters I've written on ways to keep climate and environmental coverage accurate and fair — and also useful to society.

We have all kinds of evidence of pre-human climate changes, and it doesn't negate that AGW is the cause of this climate change we are now in.

In the climate arena, I think for too long, people have used numbers like «two degrees» or «350» to give a kind of mechanistic determinant to what needs to be done, when, in fact, when you look behind those numbers, it really is much more about choices.

Now, again, I and many others have said that the environmental movement has not done a good job of creating a grassroots movement on climate that might cause the kind of concern in people contemplating voting against needed to win those 60 votes.

The IPCC can't really do this kind of thing, because it has been optimized to carry out a far more narrow technical task — answer whether climate change is occurring and whether humans are the blame, and if so how bad it might get in the future.

DeBuys finds that things will be fine for the 3.5 million people who currently depend on this water for daily use as long as (1) predictions of climate change models prove groundless, (2) the kind of droughts documented by tree rings and other records of past climate disruptions don't occur, and (3) the cities of central Arizona don't grow so much that they consume their agricultural buffer, their main protection against uncertain years ahead.

By contrast, climate «skeptics» are usually of the «I do nt like the policy options, therefore climate science is wrong» or «not what my tribe believes» kind.

Even if it could be shown that climate is more sensitive to solar variability than the strict radiative forcing would suggest (along the lines of Shindell et al) one would still have to contend with the fact that we know the solar variability for the past fifty years quite well, and it does not do the kind of things necessary to give the present warming pattern.

Climate scientists don't know where and when temperature and precipitation records will be broken, but they are confident that the next decade and especially century will have more records of all kinds broken than the last decade and century.

It certainly seems reasonable to imagine we do lack the kind of self - control needed to use just enough of the shale oil, gas and tar to pay for the climate - and - democratic transition I describe, but I think this is a bit like the dieter who believes he must stop eating almost all food to lose weight at all.

Why not do some climate science and get it published in the literature rather than poking at studies online, having the blogosphere amplify or distort your findings in a kind of short circuit that may not help push forward understanding?

The findings are the first of their kind to indicate that air pollution doesn't merely dirty the sky, it can actually change the climate too.

a) they don't believe the premise of man - made climate change: they don't think scientific data collected to date is adequate to prove conclusively that any type of man - made event can result in either the recent fluxuations in climate or the anticipated kinds of drastic climate change, therefore CO2 control would be ineffective at solving the problem b) they don't believe CO2 alone is responsible: they think other variables are as or more likely to be the catalysts or causes for the scientific data collected to date on climate change therefore CO2 control would be ineffective at solving the problem c) they believe government efforts to curb CO2 emissions will fail resulting in an unprecedented waste of money and worse economic conditions.

There are plenty of other issues looming if and when money does start to flow, including potential fights among countries exposed to various kinds of climate - linked hazards, from rising seas to protracted droughts, over who deserves help first and most.

I really don't understand what kind of point Roger Pielke Jr. was trying to make, but it appears to be a subtle attempt to slander coverage of climate change.

And once you open the Pandora's box of geoengineered climate, what do you do if nations disagree about what kind of climate they want, or if some poor nation objects to suffering drought in order to cancel heat waves in Chicago?

This is exactly the kind of article that plays into one of your last blogs discussing how the «words» we use or choose over climate change either do or don't get our attention.

«And, more often than not, that kind of basic information about what the climate is doing in our communities is being transmitted by meteorologists.