Not exact matches
The ripples are all
of the things in the
economy that support the
energy revolution... that provide all
kinds of investment opportunity.»
As is typical in these
kinds of reports, the main findings are completely reasonable if not exactly ground - breaking: China needs to increase the share
of consumption in its
economy, lessen the grip
of state - owned enterprises, move toward letting the market more accurately price
energy and capital, deal more seriously with environmental degradation, and just generally become a more market - oriented
economy.
You know, another point is that even if you put aside those
kinds of consequences, the fact is that you are always investing in your
energy infrastructure anyway; so for example there are very expensive things you could do that would be involved in trying to change how electricity is distributed across the country to help along, you know, [a] hydrogen based
economy.
Rather than wholeheartedly support the
kind of energy policy, civic infrastructure and lifestyle changes that will allow the United States to prosper in a post-carbon, green
economy — and build a clean
energy independence — the focus is on populist false promises that developing oil shale or lifting bans on offshore oil drilling will reduce short term
energy costs.
Because
of the ubiquity and diversity
of energy use in a modern
economy, conventional regulatory approaches — standards
of various
kinds — simply can not do the job.
The statement reflects no wavering by Obama on his insistence that «the best way for us to transition to a clean
energy economy is with a bill that makes clean
energy the profitable
kind of energy for America's businesses by putting a price on pollution.»
It was the first strategic community planning document
of its
kind, and went beyond the issues
of energy supply, to look at across - the - board creative adaptations in the realms
of food, farming, education,
economy, health, and much more.
In many cases, they're growing — and
kind of like Pat Sajak, it's time to take the Clean
Energy Would Kill the
Economy show off the air once and for all.
And through conversations with others in the growing climate justice movement, I began to see all
kinds of ways that climate change could become a catalyzing force for positive change — how it could be the best argument progressives have ever had to demand the rebuilding and reviving
of local
economies; to reclaim our democracies from corrosive corporate influence; to block harmful new free trade deals and rewrite old ones; to invest in starving public infrastructure like mass transit and affordable housing; to take back ownership
of essential services like
energy and water; to remake our sick agricultural system into something much healthier; to open borders to migrants whose displacement is linked to climate impacts; to finally respect Indigenous land rights — all
of which would help to end grotesque levels
of inequality within our nations and between them.
«But to truly transform our
economy, protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages
of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable
energy the profitable
kind of energy.
To me this use
of screen size classes is a flawed idea — It would be
kind of like giving a Hummer an
Energy Star label because it has the best fuel
economy of the Ultra Pig class.
«But we certainly do want to see Congress — and hopefully they will in the context
of this budget agreement — make the
kinds of investments in renewable and clean
energy that are good for our
economy and have the potential to create good American middle - class jobs down the line.»
With Ontario municipalities receiving so little for hosting industrial wind turbines it is surprising the Canadian Wind
Energy Association (CanWEA) when faced with any kind of opposition would issue a press release that claims: «Right now there are literally thousands of Ontarians participating in the province's ground - breaking clean energy ec
Energy Association (CanWEA) when faced with any
kind of opposition would issue a press release that claims: «Right now there are literally thousands
of Ontarians participating in the province's ground - breaking clean
energy ec
energy economy.
Alternatively, if B.C. Hydro were to build the same
kind of small B.C. Hydro projects it is now purchasing much
of its private
energy from, it would benefit from lower borrowing costs and significant
economies based on avoiding the expensive duplication inherent in projects built by numerous private developers.
The premise
of the Berkeley study is both unique and simple: when people spend less on
energy they transfer these dollars to groceries and other goods that boost the overall
economy, creating all
kinds of jobs.
We'll show our politicians that a continental transition away from fossil fuels and toward a new
kind of just
economy — centered on 100 % renewable
energy — is not only possible but within our grasp.
To talk about
energy and the
economy is a tautology: every economic activity is fundamentally nothing but a conversion
of one
kind of energy to another, and monies are just a convenient (and often rather unrepresentative) proxy for valuing the
energy flows.