Sentences with phrase «kind of evidence do»

What kind of evidence do we have that they understand what they are learning?
If somebody makes a claim, you have to ask what kind of evidence do they have?
What kind of evidence do you look at in the book?
What kinds of evidence do you need?

Not exact matches

If so, what evidence do you have that people like that are deterred by punishments of that kind?
«There's all kinds of evidence now that says companies that use data effectively have a competitive advantage over those who don't,» says Jan Kestle, founder and president of Environics Analytics.
«Actually Marx already predicted that there could be a kind of socialism which combined socialist principles with the achievements of Western capitalist civilizations but he didn't say how this kind of socialism would work since there was no evidence available during his lifetime,» Su Wei, a professor at a party school for ideological training in Chongqing, in southwestern China, told the Global Times.
Don't know if there is any evidence to back this one up, but it is kind of strange that it was ignored in this article (or maybe not?).
While I don't care about Will Wilkinson as such, I will agree with Pete that he is representative of a trend among sophisticated young people: A kind of individualism that might be more evidence still of the victory of....
Otherwise, you adopt the same kind of mindset they do when they expect people to just accept their statements as facts, yet they provide no evidence to support them...
no apparent evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)
@Herbert What kind of empirical evidence do you have for your belief in god?
Do you have some kind of evidence, tf that PE was invented because of some specific shortage of transitional forms?
It is not the kind of evidence that atheist's give me for why they don't believe.
The Gospels do not afford the kind of evidence needed to trace the course of his life or to explore his mind and personality.
l know atheists don't take this kind of evidence into account, however I must say it.
«A personal experience is fine, but without corrobrating evidence of some kind, I don't have enough faith in our ability as objective observers to take it on your word alone.
It can not have done so, because all of our evidence indicates that the kind of theological emphasis associated with the «last supper» in the gospels was by no means the major emphasis in early Christian communal meals from the very beginning, as it would have to have been if this had been the occasion for them.
Whenever pluralism in theology resists the need for argument, warrants, theory, evidence, praxis, it becomes a kind of Will Rogers pluralism: one where theologians have never met a position they didn't like.
John Donvan doesn't cite any study and it seems spurious at best without some kind of evidence.
There is absolutely no logic and evidence to believe in anything to do with any kind of faith or religion.
As for failure to show that God exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just what kind of «evidence» are you looking for, and just how long do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?
For my part, when I look at the way events unfold in the world, I do not see any evidence there of the kind of divine activity called for by the Whiteheadian notion of God's consequent nature weaving itself across his primordial nature and then returning the «superjective» vision back to the world in an operative, effective manner through the shaping of subjective aims.
What kinds of «intangible, impalpable» evidence do you think trumps physical evidence?
This does not mean that they approached the myths as moderns, believing only what accorded with some kind of evidence, or seeking the kernel of existential truth in the supernaturalistic husk.
However, all this, as we know, has had to be reconsidered by Christians, Mother Church included, once the geological and palaeontological sciences began to reveal the apparently immense age of the earth and the evidence that the biological species did not all come into existence at once exactly as they are today but by some kind of transformism.
Both kinds of evidence need to be considered, for while the letters provide invaluable insights into his mind and the way in which he viewed his ministry they do not set forth so clearly what it was that he did or the ways in which others viewed him.
I kind of agree with you in that there is no harm done having ones faith, usually anyway, and I've heard there's evidence it is beneficial.
I know atheists don't take this kind of evidence into account, however I must say it.
They don't harness any facts or evidence of any kind.
I mean, what kind of fool would throw his entire life away, submitting and worshiping someone who does not exist and does not show himself and wants me to believe in evidence 2000 years old?
If he did exist there would be some kind of evidence for him, but there is none.
In fact the evidence supporting evolution does contradict the special creation, the coexistence of all «kinds» together and their destruction in a single (mythical) global flood.
That many Christians reject that the kind of «evidence» an atheist demands for the existence of God is necessary, and that it is perfectly reasonable to do so.
But does someone with a sharp intellect really bandy about quite so many assertions for which he offers no evidence of any kind, as though they were so well known that proof is unnecessary?
thefinisher1 Are prosecutors, police and juries stubborn spoiled brats for accepting what DNA, fingerprint, video, and all kinds of other evidence indicate about who committed a crime rather than having the faith to just take the accused word that they didn't do it?
why don't you start with why humans invented religion in the first place, the origins of the books of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history of time, fossil evidence of evolution of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible, knowledge of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses of christianity in the time of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.
Eventually, I will have some kind of panel done to see what I am allergic to, so that will be helpful for me in making better decisions, but until then I do want to stay gluten free because of ALL the overwhelming evidence that shows how it messes up our guts.
We now have the kind of financial evidence that reducing food loss and waste is the right thing to do for bottom lines and people's pockets.
It's horrible that they were accused of something so serious that they didn't do, but that kind of «data» is purely apocryphal: all the evidence and studies points to women getting ignored and having their cases tossed far more than the reverse.
They have some kind of research or evidence that shows that what they are doing is successful and improving social skills for kids with Autism.
They may have some hormonal ups and downs, but just as women don't appreciate being grouped together and defined by exaggerated stories of PMS and men don't like every decision they make in middle - age to be labeled evidence of a midlife crisis, teens don't deserve that kind of disrespectful stereotyping, either.
These kinds of studies pile on the guilt for a mother who desperately needs sleep and whose only option might be to sleep with her child, but the public health community refuses to do evidence - based studies into best practices to give her practical advice she can actually use.
Like those idiot midwives who believe fear stalls labour, despite abundant evidence that it does nothing of the kind?
Anecdotal and survey evidence suggests that as soon as Groups and Apps spread widely, Facebook users became overwhelmed by the volume of invitations they received (as an example, I currently have 173 pending requests of some kind — sorry if I didn't install the «what's your stripper name» application you suggested).
English does serve as a kind of de facto lingua franca in a number of international settings, but it is not, from what I have read, taught universally in South America, many African countries, or in parts of Asia, at least not at an early age for effective language acquisition (and I am unaware of any evidence that English is projected to take over in a reasonable period of time on its own; I have read that in Southeast Asia, for example, emphasis may even be shifting to Chinese).
... There's a lot of evidence out there that the housing market is slowing; we're not going to be able to create the kind of affordable housing that we need in the city if we don't have a tax credit program that's appropriate and really focuses on affordability.
Furthermore, the committee argued, there is little credible evidence that you can do anything to delay the kinds of memory problems that are often associated with aging.
Ione Fine, a neuroscientist at the University of Washington, Seattle, who studies brain changes and did not work on the project, says Amedi's work is the best evidence yet for functional constancy — the idea that areas of the brain do the same job even with different kinds of input.
«We speculate — but don't have the evidence to back this idea yet — that the MS4As are used as a kind of alert system for the brain, letting it know that something of real importance is out there in the world, but not telling the brain explicitly what that thing is.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z