What
kind of evidence do we have that they understand what they are learning?
If somebody makes a claim, you have to ask what
kind of evidence do they have?
What
kind of evidence do you look at in the book?
What
kinds of evidence do you need?
Not exact matches
If so, what
evidence do you have that people like that are deterred by punishments
of that
kind?
«There's all
kinds of evidence now that says companies that use data effectively have a competitive advantage over those who don't,» says Jan Kestle, founder and president
of Environics Analytics.
«Actually Marx already predicted that there could be a
kind of socialism which combined socialist principles with the achievements
of Western capitalist civilizations but he didn't say how this
kind of socialism would work since there was no
evidence available during his lifetime,» Su Wei, a professor at a party school for ideological training in Chongqing, in southwestern China, told the Global Times.
Don't know if there is any
evidence to back this one up, but it is
kind of strange that it was ignored in this article (or maybe not?).
While I don't care about Will Wilkinson as such, I will agree with Pete that he is representative
of a trend among sophisticated young people: A
kind of individualism that might be more
evidence still
of the victory
of....
Otherwise, you adopt the same
kind of mindset they
do when they expect people to just accept their statements as facts, yet they provide no
evidence to support them...
no apparent
evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience
of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some
kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.
Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)
@Herbert What
kind of empirical
evidence do you have for your belief in god?
Do you have some
kind of evidence, tf that PE was invented because
of some specific shortage
of transitional forms?
It is not the
kind of evidence that atheist's give me for why they don't believe.
The Gospels
do not afford the
kind of evidence needed to trace the course
of his life or to explore his mind and personality.
l know atheists don't take this
kind of evidence into account, however I must say it.
«A personal experience is fine, but without corrobrating
evidence of some
kind, I don't have enough faith in our ability as objective observers to take it on your word alone.
It can not have
done so, because all
of our
evidence indicates that the
kind of theological emphasis associated with the «last supper» in the gospels was by no means the major emphasis in early Christian communal meals from the very beginning, as it would have to have been if this had been the occasion for them.
Whenever pluralism in theology resists the need for argument, warrants, theory,
evidence, praxis, it becomes a
kind of Will Rogers pluralism: one where theologians have never met a position they didn't like.
John Donvan doesn't cite any study and it seems spurious at best without some
kind of evidence.
There is absolutely no logic and
evidence to believe in anything to
do with any
kind of faith or religion.
As for failure to show that God exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just what
kind of «
evidence» are you looking for, and just how long
do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «
evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?
For my part, when I look at the way events unfold in the world, I
do not see any
evidence there
of the
kind of divine activity called for by the Whiteheadian notion
of God's consequent nature weaving itself across his primordial nature and then returning the «superjective» vision back to the world in an operative, effective manner through the shaping
of subjective aims.
What
kinds of «intangible, impalpable»
evidence do you think trumps physical
evidence?
This
does not mean that they approached the myths as moderns, believing only what accorded with some
kind of evidence, or seeking the kernel
of existential truth in the supernaturalistic husk.
However, all this, as we know, has had to be reconsidered by Christians, Mother Church included, once the geological and palaeontological sciences began to reveal the apparently immense age
of the earth and the
evidence that the biological species
did not all come into existence at once exactly as they are today but by some
kind of transformism.
Both
kinds of evidence need to be considered, for while the letters provide invaluable insights into his mind and the way in which he viewed his ministry they
do not set forth so clearly what it was that he
did or the ways in which others viewed him.
I
kind of agree with you in that there is no harm
done having ones faith, usually anyway, and I've heard there's
evidence it is beneficial.
I know atheists don't take this
kind of evidence into account, however I must say it.
They don't harness any facts or
evidence of any
kind.
I mean, what
kind of fool would throw his entire life away, submitting and worshiping someone who
does not exist and
does not show himself and wants me to believe in
evidence 2000 years old?
If he
did exist there would be some
kind of evidence for him, but there is none.
In fact the
evidence supporting evolution
does contradict the special creation, the coexistence
of all «
kinds» together and their destruction in a single (mythical) global flood.
That many Christians reject that the
kind of «
evidence» an atheist demands for the existence
of God is necessary, and that it is perfectly reasonable to
do so.
But
does someone with a sharp intellect really bandy about quite so many assertions for which he offers no
evidence of any
kind, as though they were so well known that proof is unnecessary?
thefinisher1 Are prosecutors, police and juries stubborn spoiled brats for accepting what DNA, fingerprint, video, and all
kinds of other
evidence indicate about who committed a crime rather than having the faith to just take the accused word that they didn't
do it?
why don't you start with why humans invented religion in the first place, the origins
of the books
of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history
of time, fossil
evidence of evolution
of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible, knowledge
of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses
of christianity in the time
of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part
of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good,
kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.
Eventually, I will have some
kind of panel
done to see what I am allergic to, so that will be helpful for me in making better decisions, but until then I
do want to stay gluten free because
of ALL the overwhelming
evidence that shows how it messes up our guts.
We now have the
kind of financial
evidence that reducing food loss and waste is the right thing to
do for bottom lines and people's pockets.
It's horrible that they were accused
of something so serious that they didn't
do, but that
kind of «data» is purely apocryphal: all the
evidence and studies points to women getting ignored and having their cases tossed far more than the reverse.
They have some
kind of research or
evidence that shows that what they are
doing is successful and improving social skills for kids with Autism.
They may have some hormonal ups and downs, but just as women don't appreciate being grouped together and defined by exaggerated stories
of PMS and men don't like every decision they make in middle - age to be labeled
evidence of a midlife crisis, teens don't deserve that
kind of disrespectful stereotyping, either.
These
kinds of studies pile on the guilt for a mother who desperately needs sleep and whose only option might be to sleep with her child, but the public health community refuses to
do evidence - based studies into best practices to give her practical advice she can actually use.
Like those idiot midwives who believe fear stalls labour, despite abundant
evidence that it
does nothing
of the
kind?
Anecdotal and survey
evidence suggests that as soon as Groups and Apps spread widely, Facebook users became overwhelmed by the volume
of invitations they received (as an example, I currently have 173 pending requests
of some
kind — sorry if I didn't install the «what's your stripper name» application you suggested).
English
does serve as a
kind of de facto lingua franca in a number
of international settings, but it is not, from what I have read, taught universally in South America, many African countries, or in parts
of Asia, at least not at an early age for effective language acquisition (and I am unaware
of any
evidence that English is projected to take over in a reasonable period
of time on its own; I have read that in Southeast Asia, for example, emphasis may even be shifting to Chinese).
... There's a lot
of evidence out there that the housing market is slowing; we're not going to be able to create the
kind of affordable housing that we need in the city if we don't have a tax credit program that's appropriate and really focuses on affordability.
Furthermore, the committee argued, there is little credible
evidence that you can
do anything to delay the
kinds of memory problems that are often associated with aging.
Ione Fine, a neuroscientist at the University
of Washington, Seattle, who studies brain changes and
did not work on the project, says Amedi's work is the best
evidence yet for functional constancy — the idea that areas
of the brain
do the same job even with different
kinds of input.
«We speculate — but don't have the
evidence to back this idea yet — that the MS4As are used as a
kind of alert system for the brain, letting it know that something
of real importance is out there in the world, but not telling the brain explicitly what that thing is.»