Sentences with phrase «kind of forms do»

What kind of forms do I need to complete when I apply for an SES position?

For the home side to have any chance of picking up a huge victory over Spurs they will need Defoe to show the kind of form he did when he was wearing a Spurs shirt.

What kind of form do you think you will use at this speed?

Not exact matches

Mr. Martin didn't elaborate regarding what forms of interference he had in mind, what kinds of getting - in - the - way he wanted corporations to forego.

But that form does not require Sanders to disclose the amount of savings or the kinds of investments he holds in his government retirement savings account, known as the Thrift Savings Plan — the well - regarded retirement plan, similar in many ways, to a private - sector 401 (k), that GOP hopeful Marco Rubio actually proposes opening up to other Americans.

When you do all three kinds of research and convert that research into well - formed personas, you end up with buyer personas that you and your team want to use — personas that help you get the right content to the right people at the right time.

A steadily increasing number of people will want to get in on the «new Bitcoin,» a bizarre paradox given that gold is as old as time, and will soon realize that gold possesses virtues Bitcoin does not, given that it is real, not digital and abstract; that owners can personally possess and store it in physical form; that it will survive any kind of electric grid or Internet disruption that might occur; that it can not ever be hacked; that it is the epitome of private, quiet wealth; that it is actually quite beautiful to behold; and that it was not and can not be made by man, only by God, who does not appear to have any interest in making any more of it.

And frankly I think it's a good trend in the sense that if you want to legitimize a new form of money it has to be regulated to some degree so that people won't get ripped off by fraud, like people selling Bitcoin they don't actually own or you know this kind of thing.

I would never be able to do a 90 - second plank or full - range push - ups much less make it through the rest of the class with any kind of proper form.

When doing any kind of trading or investing we should always be incorporating some form of F.A. (Fundamental Analysis) into our repertoire!

it cracks me up that people would be respectful to any god that would offer up their own son in blood scarifice, not a kind and benevolent, all knowing god, an evil and hateful god, we would be better off overing respects to santa clause, to my knowledge all he does is disappoint from time to time ive never known him to kill and destroy mankind by divers and sundry forms of cruel punishment.

Do you have some kind of evidence, tf that PE was invented because of some specific shortage of transitional forms?

Why do we think it's okay to allow this kind of abuse to continue in any shape or form.

We find ourselves in different stages and manifestations of that grief — disbelief, anger, stunned silence, the need to do something, the need to exert some kind of control in a world that seems so desperately out of control — and so we have to be patient with one another, gracious when our grief takes different forms.

For by «mental» prayer traditional writers have intended to denote the kind of conscious relationship with God that does not require the use of words, spoken or formed.

The violence done by the superior may be physical (the most common kind, and it provokes hostile moral reaction), or it may be psychological or spiritual, as when the superior makes use of morality and even of Christianity to inculcate submission and a servile attitude; and this is the most heinous of all forms of violence.

«We are trying to say what role does theology play in forming digital culture - in enabling digital culture - but also in kind of protecting us against that digital culture.

Now the claim that could appropriately be advanced on behalf of this form of panpsychism in respect of considerations of parsimony would be that it does with fewer kinds of entity what it would be vain to do with more — that it does with one kind of entity what the dualist only achieves with two.

Different kinds of stories function in different ways, but stories do function to form or transform persons in their world views and lifestyles.

In the future, fewer people will marry, more people who marry will divorce, more people who many will do so later in life, more people will cohabit, fewer people will have children, more people who have children will do so outside of marriage and more people will want to form informal unions of various kinds and experiment with reproductive technologies outside of either marriage or heterosexual unions.

Taken by itself, the counseling image might suggest that the pastor can do all the helping needed, or that he is concerned only with some kinds of suffering and not with all, or that this is the elite form of helping to which all others are inferior.

I don't know what kind of forms or what information women have when they go to get an abortion, but maybe the abortion clinic could explain other options that they have and make sure they are educated.

Addiionally, the last time they DID attempt to get some kind of proof (in the form of a 1989 «Triennial Survey»!)

Decades of «renewal» programmes in parishes which have taken the form of marketing fresh insights to small «encounter groups», often under the banners of buzzwords written on posters reminiscent of the kind which were used to promote five - year plans in the Soviet bloc, have done nothing to increase the numbers of practising Catholics.

The reasons for accepting it do not form the kind of deductive proof we require in logic or pure mathematics, but they resemble the arguments used in a court of law to establish innocence or culpability.

One hates to make old arguments, but if this education teaches (as other sections of the report make clear that is must) the familiar doctrines about how very wrong it is to impose any kind of normative standard on the many forms that peoples» desires can take, on what basis does it exclude pornography or the sexualization of young girls as legitimate forms of the varied human sexual appetite?

Yet he does not seem to recognize that this can only mean one thing: The revelation of God in Christ must come to you and me by way of a kind of interchange between individuals in deep communion, whereby the meaning of past events can possess our minds and transform our lives, even as it did in the fellowship that formed around Jesus.

It is really sad that many seculars form their entire view of Christianity based on misleading articles like this (Er, Ms. Evans, don't you think the little detail about Stewarts comment being about the old testament is kind of important??)

If you don't get it — a shame, but ultimately what history teaches is new forms of hate come up wrapped in all kinds of denial.

I think drama and story are crucial components for helping us move to that kind of approach, but I also do not think that all forms of study, teaching (although more dialogical), and research all go out the window.

This argument breaks down on the fact that the contemporary form critic does not deal with a nebulous entity, «the community», to which he ascribes all kinds of powers; he deals with specific groups, individuals and traditions which he isolates, identifies and delineates.

The profound cleavage in every kind of social group (families, countries, professions, creeds) which during the past century has become manifest in the form of two increasingly distinct and irreconcilable human types, those who believe in progress and those who do not — what does this portend except the separation and birth of a new stratum in the biosphere?

Be does not intend to channel universal movement by means of universal concepts and categories (quantity, quality) into the form of various kinds of movement (local motion, change) or various patterns of movement (for instance, circular motion), with the ultimate aim of utilizing the constant diversity of these kinds and patterns of movement, and hence the essence of identity, to make a case for the truth of a timeless and imperishable being belonging to things.

In the space of time available to him, of course, Mr. Clinton could offer little more than a hasty outline of this proposal, but he did manage to make clear that what he was referring to was some sort of system whereby American high school (and, as it was to turn out, also college) graduates would exchange some years of service, either as policemen, environmental workers, or offerers of some form of assistance to poor children, in exchange for the government's subsequently paying their college tuition» a kind of GI Bill for non-GIs.

I'll be open however to considering discussing the kind of issues with you should you take a different approach to the argument form authority should you show that you would like to do so.

It is true also that it does form what, perhaps, for the first time, may be called a book, but it was certainly never the fixed and unchanging kind of a book that most Bibles have become.

I truly hope you do not equate everyone that ask questions the way you did me it was kind of bad form to do that to someone asking a Christian site biblical questions.

That does not mean it is the only kind of life, or that life is unable to form under other conditions.

Wieman seemed puzzled that «Whitehead does not seem to attach any value to this state of awareness, that Whitehead in fact conjectured that this might be the kind of awareness present in lower life forms.

I think most people nowadays reject religion in any form because they don't want to have rules of any kind whatsoever in their life, and I find that sad and worrisome for the future of we as human beings.

I'm not a bible thumping «you got ta think as I do» kind of person, but I will say that for all of recorded history religion has existed on one form or another.

The rationalizations will usually take the form of words about being different from «our kind of people»; about inferior and superior races; about dirt and smells, or dishonesty and treachery and the «yellow peril»; about the danger of intermarriage; about how those of other races are «creeping up on us» and «don't know their place.»

In recent years I have experimented with different kinds of involvement in social issues — with limited success — and I have done some thinking about what form a new social gospel movement might take.

This does not answer the «question of the historical Jesus», but rather raises it in what we regard as its proper form, namely: What is the relationship between the three kinds of knowledge of Jesus of Nazareth that we may be said to possess?

But it apparently does exclude many other kinds of communication, such as nversation that is not aimed at persuading someone of a particular point of view and discourse oriented solely toward description or enrtainment (though this is not to say that these other forms of discourse ight not have some ideological overtones).

The scribes did the first, and the Pharisees (among whom are to be reckoned many scribes) did the second; they formed a kind of brotherhood within the Jewish community.

This hippie sounding form of ecclesiology has been tried and it does not work, And to be honest, what I've discovered is that a number of people that promote this kind of stuff do not want to be part of a organization because it demands and orders them, has structure, accountability, and sacrifice, which is something people don't like.

They do form kind of a gel on the outside which is what makes the pudding thick, but they still have a little bite to them.

I've been afraid to try lentil loaf, as I didn't grow up with meatloaf and the whole «dinner in loaf form» idea kind of scared me.

@john0711 I was asking of players worse than Giroud for Arsenal in terms of finishing.I consisered finishing only.Out of your list when all are in form you can argue that Walcott is better.But in terms of finishing he's the worst of that lot.Only Gervinho's finishing is worse.The guy doesn't deserve this club and so does many of our current players.Face reality he's odinary and if you were a manager and wanted success would you put in a # 30 bid for Giroud?Yet his stats suggest he may be worth # 30 showing the contradiction between stats and real life.The earlier we get some average players out of our club and stop defending the indefensible the better for us all.With this kind of mentality success will be far from this club.