I guess its up to you and your wife to determine what
kind of freedom in decision making you feel is most important.
Partly, I believe, because people are experiencing a kind of concord that can embody
the kind of freedom in relation to others — even our enemies — that God has made possible.
Not exact matches
But several have said they want the
freedom to give preference to certain
kinds of internet traffic and some have already begun giving a leg up to their own sites and services
in other ways.
As Broad considers what
kind of offer to make, the
Freedom asset sale moves along
in parallel.
No warranty
of any
kind, express or implied, including but not limited to the warranties
of non-infringement
of third - party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and
freedom from computer virus is given
in conjunction with the information, materials, products, and services.
I obviously can't speak for everyone, but I think the most common allure to generating that
kind of passive income is that it can give you the
freedom to pursue those other challenges
in life.
From «The Best List»
in the December issue
of Kiplinger's Personal Finance, our picks for the best smartphone plan for every
kind of user: Families With the Sprint Unlimited
Freedom Plan, you'll pay $ 90 a month through October 2018 (you must make...
Hopefully someone will read this and realize that all
of the bickering
in these posts regarding God vs No God, bill boards, religion, and
freedom of choice will simply chill out, self - reflect, and work to live their lives sharing
kind thoughts, practicing good deeds, showing extreme patience, and exampling humility.
Its a sad day when our young black men do nt have the
freedom to walk through certain neighborhoods without being harrased are mudered, no one has the right to just take a life just because
of the color
of your skin we as a people has to stand up to injustices such as this no one wants to hear the truth there is still a racial devide
in America and our justice system create laws so that this
kind of injustice can continue to happen rather u want to admit it are not our young black men are the prey.
Kind of the same way «Faith» is a tool and «Creation» the theory... Bottom line, our country and everything great about it was founded
in freedom of religion.
«It is symptomatic,» she wrote, «that the Congress for Cultural
Freedom, which God knows, has never lifted a finger in this country for either culture or freedom, has become a kind of collecting point for these types.
Freedom, which God knows, has never lifted a finger
in this country for either culture or
freedom, has become a kind of collecting point for these types.
freedom, has become a
kind of collecting point for these types.»
God has left everything for the final day and everyone will get something no matter we believe
in it or not so over time we develop a
kind of fearlessness (no fear
of God) because He is not following us
in an unmarked car like a cop and this
freedom we use
in a wrong way.
It is has become commonplace to regard Ivan Karamazov's «Legend
of the Grand Inquisitor» as a prescient parable glorifying human
freedom and defending it against the
kind of totalitarian threats it would face
in the twentieth century.
Like these men and women, we, too are petitioning for a
kind of religious
freedom that frees us to kick darkness, oppression, and bullying
in the teeth.
«one
of the greatest dangers to the
freedom of the individual to worship
in his own way lay
in the Government's placing its official stamp
of approval upon one particular
kind of prayer or one particular form
of religious services.»
For the saving love
of God to be present to human beings it would have to be so
in a way different from how it is present to other aspects
of the body
of the world —
in a way
in keeping with the peculiar
kind of creatures we are, namely, creatures with a special
kind of freedom, able to participate self - consciously (as well as be influenced unconsciously)
in an evolutionary process.
He also proclaimed that people don.t have a soul,
in an apologetic poor dear
kind of tone - I believe the subject
of a soul is still debatable
in the USA - that is, if we still really have
freedom of speech -
However improbable
in a mechanistic sense the elaborate organic structure created by life may appear, it seems increasingly evident that the cosmic substance is drawn toward these states
of extreme arrangement by a particular
kind of attraction which compels it, by the play
of large numbers
in which it is involved, to miss no opportunity
of becoming more complex and thus achieving a higher degree
of freedom.
You will grow
in the
freedom to be inside or outside all
kinds of systems and to move freely between and among them.
What
kind of freedom would it be if God just destroyed Satan when Satan used his
freedom in ways God didn't want?
When I read this, about 15 years ago, I was stunned that God wanted His people to use the tithe to celebrate with our families and to help the less financially «properous» people (instead
of judging them) I had such mixed feelings,
of freedom and joy
in God but also a
kind of betrayal from what has been taught, almost to scare us.
Freedom can never be absolute, since only God is abk solute, and will always have to be subject to some
kind of regulation
in any specific setting.
Generally defined as «dominating, restraining, or controlling another forcibly,» coercion involves interference with
freedom, where «interference» means that the
freedom in question is lessened
in comparison with what it would have been had the interfering individual or group not acted at all, and this broad designation leaves open to dispute what
kinds of interference are immoral.
Is that the
kind of freedom you're talking about
in your post?
Seen against the background
of McGovern's book, however, Sigmund's invitation to liberation theologians to make an either - or choice between «revolution or democracy» seems too simple, and
in the long run it obscures the
kind of fundamental
freedoms for which Latin America still awaits.
The
kind of action from social awareness that is demanded by perfect love is such as must admit the tragic reality that there are people who are genuinely intent upon using their
freedom to destroy the
freedom of others, and that, under certain circumstances, love itself may dictate that «It is better that many should die prematurely than that nearly all men should live
in a permanent state
of hostility or slavery» (MVG 173).
There is a necessary dimension
of the tragic
in our creaturehood (yes, I think it is a necessary dimension), because any
kind of freedom or victory
of the good without it would be shallow and unworthy
of both God and humanity as they are viewed
in Scripture.
We're
in an energy crisis, stupid religions are fighting each other, men are so afraid
of women
in other countries having any
kind of personal
freedom, people are starving, the world is becoming over-populated to the point where it simply can not support itself, and you prefer to sit around and argue this stuff instead.
In one particularly striking passage, he defines liberalism as: «
freedom from the restrictions
of the soil - bound life, be these privileges, forms, or feelings —
freedom of the intellect for every
kind of criticism,
freedom of money for every
kind of business.
Parents need help
in adjusting relationships and family rules as children grow older so they can experience the freedom and the responsibility they need in order to grow up.4 In some congregations, this kind of learning and support occurs in parent - education groups
in adjusting relationships and family rules as children grow older so they can experience the
freedom and the responsibility they need
in order to grow up.4 In some congregations, this kind of learning and support occurs in parent - education groups
in order to grow up.4
In some congregations, this kind of learning and support occurs in parent - education groups
In some congregations, this
kind of learning and support occurs
in parent - education groups
in parent - education groups.5
They meant to say that here was a new
kind of community life, exhibiting the marks
of inward spiritual power
in its
freedom, unity, and constructive energy.
These laws were put
in place to prevent the
kind of abuse that was common and provide a way to
freedom if the slave wanted it.
But
in our
kind of society it may be that the adolescent can win the necessary emotional
freedom from his parents only if, for the time being, he is permitted some distance from them.
Liberal learning, then, includes a variety
of opportunities for the practice
of freedom, and the well educated person is one who skillfully and zestfully exercises his formative powers
in the pursuit
of these various
kinds of understanding.
Our problem is not to get rid
of control
in any absolute sense but to find a new
kind of control that will allow a wider
freedom.
Pursued with the right
kind of arguments and with sufficient vigor, an escape from the «exemptions ghetto» can bring us out into an open field
of religious
freedom in full — and
of moral
freedom in full for all, thanks to the indispensable leadership role
of religious conscience, and the recognition
of the duty
of men and women to obey God before any authority
of the state.
His religious difficulty came from the
kind of theology he found around him, its habit
of identifying words
in a book (written by human hands and thought by human brains) with the words
of God, also from the habit
of playing fast and loose with the dangerously ambiguous concepts
of omnipotence and omniscience, and taking these more seriously than any definite affirmation
of the
freedom of creatures to make decisions that are their own and not God's.
It takes a lot
of courage to admit you no longer believe and a different
kind of faith, faith
in oneself to finally take the first step toward true
freedom.
This knowledge gives a
kind of certainty such as is possible
in the realm
of history and
freedom, that is as a claim to make
freedom itself a binding norm.
It may also happen that such a Christianity gives the impression
of a
kind of drill, almost
of a subtle form
of brainwashing, a sociological routine which may produce a bourgeois Christianity but not Christian
freedom, and which therefore remains unimportant
in the sight
of God.
There's a lot
of very fine
freedom and opportunity that comes with this, but it's also easy to just
kind of go with the flow
of the culture
in the absence
of deliberate and sustained attention to developing Christian habits
of life.
They often include provisions about religious practices for the couple and for any children who may arrive; whether or not they plan to have children; what they will do
in the case
of a pregnancy not wanted by one or the other; what will happen if the couple decides to separate; what the financial arrangements will be
in such a case; what provision will be made for the children; how
in - laws, relatives, and friends will be included
in the relationship; what sexual practices will be followed; under what circumstances the couple will move from one home to another; whose job will take precedence; and what
kinds of freedom each partner is to have.
The directive
of the churches represented
in Faith and Order — that a study
of worship be pursued over a number
of years — indicates a recognition that there is a giveness to Christian worship, and that the common degradation
of worship into gimmicks for religious mood - engendering is a
kind of impoverishment, a failure, a positive disobedience hiding behind the face
of individualism, spontaneity,
freedom.
As Christian churches developed
in America — and many more
kinds of them with the establishment first
of religious toleration and then
of religious
freedom — the ordained minister tended to become more dependent on his relations with his local congregation than was true
in Britain or on the Continent.
When we think
of all that has come from him
in the impulse toward human
freedom and dignity — the challenge
of ignorance and the attempt to remedy it, the concern for and conquest
of disease, the sensitivity to the needs and plight
of the weak, destitute, helpless, and those
in every
kind of suffering, the stabilizing
of the inner lives
of millions
of his followers around the world, and the fostering
of a prophetic attack on such giant social evils as prejudice, injustice, and war — when we consider the things that have stemmed from this «penniless teacher
of Nazareth,» we are dull indeed if the wonder
of it does not sweep over our souls.
Anglicanism represents, we believe, the
kind of dynamic Catholicism which alone can guarantee the maintenance
of the historic faith, while at the same time securing that
freedom which man has discovered
in the days since the Reformation and which he properly and firmly insists shall be his right.
Why is it that
freedom and reconciliation have so often been celebrated
in this
kind of singing?
In her book One Woman's Fight, published by the
Freedom from Religion Foundation, she said she was sure that «I fought not only for what I earnestly believed to be right, but for the truest kind of religious freedom intended by the First Amendment, the complete separation of church and state.
Freedom from Religion Foundation, she said she was sure that «I fought not only for what I earnestly believed to be right, but for the truest
kind of religious
freedom intended by the First Amendment, the complete separation of church and state.
freedom intended by the First Amendment, the complete separation
of church and state.»
Does it not suggest that this is a general law
of life; that the living creature, compelled for its own survival to attach itself materially and spiritually to others
of its
kind, and to an increasing extent as it progresses autonomously and
in individual
freedom, is automatically prevented by Nature from rising above a given level
of emancipation and consciousness?
It is because the temporal atomicity allows for two
kinds of process, the internal process
of self - determination called «concresence,» as well as the efficient process
of «transition» from occasion to occasion, that there can be
freedom in the universe (PR 135).