Sentences with phrase «kind of marriage do»

You may not want a divorce, but what kind of marriage do you actually want?

What kind of marriage do you want?

What kind of marriage do you want to have in six months?

There is one more kind of marriage you didn't mention.

Not exact matches

The kind of marriage desired by Christ is a sacrament; it is a visible representation of the transforming grace that has created a new reality that did not exist before.

Really Daniel, I don't know what kind of marriage you have, but my wife and I do not need one of us to have veto power over the other in order for our family to function.

I don't seem to hear people being concerned about any other kinds of contracts; why the marriage contract?

They are more likely to favor same - sex marriage, and are unreceptive to the kind of fear of big government / socialized medicine political shorthand that is commonplace in conservative discourse (the scare words don't scare them).

«Hey did you guys see that Rosie ODonnel has a problem again with her lover and she has kids good role model just the kind of person that is great advertising for gay marriage.

Second, while divorce negates an important element of marriage, it doesn't change the kind of relationship we're speaking about.

In the future, fewer people will marry, more people who marry will divorce, more people who many will do so later in life, more people will cohabit, fewer people will have children, more people who have children will do so outside of marriage and more people will want to form informal unions of various kinds and experiment with reproductive technologies outside of either marriage or heterosexual unions.

In that sense, the Presbyterian debates do not feel like friendly arguments over the breakfast table, or even the more heated kinds of exchanges that might take place in the presence of a marriage counselor.

As one 19 - year - old told me, «I don't need no marriage course to tell me the kind of person I like.»

It is important for the counselor when working with couples to keep in mind that the new ethic of equality between the sexes in marriage does not mean there is some kind of new blueprint for what a marriage ought to be like.

The general belief after the 2014 synod, both inside and particularly outside the Church, was that the Catholic Church is now gearing up, not for some kind of change in pastoral strategy, but for fundamental changes in its teachings (hitherto immutable) on important questions to do with marriage and with sexual morality.

I don't buy your stretch saying that they are all, «a bond with God and the Holy Spirit of the kind that we find through baptism, communion, and marriage,» and even if I did, you would need to support that marriage falls under that same category as baptism instead of just telling us it does.

Mesmerized by current trends, Porter turns patronizing when the Scholastics seem to her to get something like the subordination of women within marriage wrong, noting that they «did not have the kind of historical / critical perspective on Scripture that would have enabled them to relativize these precepts.»

The issue is rather what kind of people should we be — and what we do or do not do with our genitals clearly has a bearing on that — who bring to and can sustain the kind of sexual life appropriate to the purpose of marriage in the Christian community.

With this aim in mind, homosexual marriage and the right to adoption for same - sex couples appear as nothing more than a means for exploding the foundations of society, making possible all kinds of unions, finally liberated from an ancestral morality, and therefore definitively doing away with the very notion of sexual difference.

But we can at least analyze the kinds of love that are needed by every child, and we can see the ways that the culture has organized to meet those needs, needs which, when driven deeply enough, necessitate the wisdom and the sanctity of a monogamous marriage and a faithful living together as far as possible so that the full work of parenting can be done.

Contrast this with the genuine church teaching of Pius XII: «This anti-Christian hedonism... promotes the desire to render always more intense thepleasure in the preparation and actualisation of the conjugal union, as if in matrimonial relations the whole moral law could be reduced to the regular accomplishment of the act itself, and as if all the rest, in whatever manner done, remains justified by the effusion of mutual affection, sanctified by the sacrament of marriage...» [11] In fact, it would be hard to distinguish Popcak's «One Rule for Infallible Lovers» from the kind of reduction described by the Pope.

Scripture does say that marriage is to be upheld — but does it say that that kind of loyalty and bond is supposed to be there in a local body or «church?»

Some may want to paint women like Melania as gold - diggers, but that ignores the fact that these kinds of marriages — what we call safety marriages in The New I Do — are pretty transparent arrangements; the man knows his money and status are essential to getting the kind of woman he wants.

Not to say that every couple will divorce, but some 40 percent do; you can't divorce - proof a marriage but you most certainly can set up your marriage so it doesn't foster the kinds of situations that often lead to divorce.

(I) n the course of a long term relationship, taking into account the practical realities of our human need to experience life on our own, or through experiences with other platonic or romantic relationships, perhaps a new kind of conversation can unfold with your spouse or partner where you jointly communicate your needs and set reasonable and practical parameters of what is and isn't allowed in your marriage, so the negative and hidden behaviors associated with adultery don't take place.

I did that in my two marriages, especially the second because we had kids, but I'm pretty much done with that kind of life.

And while marriage often offers «stability and predictability,» it most certainly does not guarantee that children within those unions will have the kind of environment that is indeed in their best interests.

Whatever kind of flirting that you did before you got married should continue long after marriage.

With that background, it's easy to understand why some men might be hesitant to tie the knot in the kind of one - size - fits - all traditional marriage model we've been practicing, which is yet another reason why the marital models in The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels will help brides - and grroms - to - be — and, in this case, especially the grooms — get the marriage they want without vague vows of «until death do us partmarriage model we've been practicing, which is yet another reason why the marital models in The New I Do: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels will help brides - and grroms - to - be — and, in this case, especially the grooms — get the marriage they want without vague vows of «until death do us part.&raquDo: Reshaping Marriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels will help brides - and grroms - to - be — and, in this case, especially the grooms — get the marriage they want without vague vows of «until death do us partMarriage for Skeptics, Realists and Rebels will help brides - and grroms - to - be — and, in this case, especially the grooms — get the marriage they want without vague vows of «until death do us partmarriage they want without vague vows of «until death do us part.&raqudo us part.»

Still, ask the therapist what percentage of couples» counseling they do, how long they have been in practice and what kind of formal training they have in marriage counseling.

That doesn't mean that kind of arrangement would always end without some friction, especially if one partner wants to continue the marriage and the other doesn't.

(Hey, he did admit he had «a different kind of marriage.»)

Overall, while a mixed marriage may come with a few issues, if getting into this kind of relationship is something you have been giving some serious thoughts, but you don't know where to start, the Internet can be very resourceful.

Your previous marriage may have failed as you were incompatible as people, and if this was the case, learn from it and don't go for the same kind of person who eventually you won't fit with.

It does not matter what kind of relations you look for - marriage or no stings attached dating.

My advice to every Western man is do a little preliminary research on the marriage agency you plan to join and check what kind of reviews it's getting.

I am a very happy single lady at 57 soon to be 58 in Dec I'm looking for someone kind and understanding and relaxed kind of man not really a marriage type of lady just would like to have a loving friendship with a compatible gentleman my interests are biking walking beaching sharing romantic dinners and evenings dancing I am a people person but I do like my private time with my man

Don't Propose Of course you're not going to literally propose marriage, but sometimes we can make people feel like we're thinking so much about the future and developing a serious relationship that we create all kinds of fear in theOf course you're not going to literally propose marriage, but sometimes we can make people feel like we're thinking so much about the future and developing a serious relationship that we create all kinds of fear in theof fear in them.

Their appearance is quite different from the typical appearance of Western women.Russian girls for marriage are always kind and sweet — you just need to value her highly and treat her like the treasure she actually is.Services Create your profile on our dating site to get access to the profiles of beautiful Russian and Ukrainian women.This is done on account of the large number of scammers operating on online dating sites; they create fake profiles and communicate with men in order to coax money out of them.

Doug has seen what marriage has done to his best man Phil (Bradley Cooper), a depressed school teacher locked into a marriage which doesn't allow him to let off the kind of steam that Las Vegas will.

The Dark Lake by Sarah Bailey End Game (Barnes & Noble Exclusive Edition) by David Baldacci Vicious Circle (Joe Pickett Series # 17) by C.J. Box Origin by Dan Brown Watch Me Disappear by Janelle Brown The Stolen Marriage: A Novel by Diane Chamberlain The Midnight Line by Lee Child Don't Let Go by Harlan Coben Two Kinds of Truth (Barnes & Noble Exclusive Edition) by Michael Connelly The Cuban Affair by Nelson DeMille The Child Finder by Rene Denfeld Hardcore Twenty - Four (Stephanie Plum Series # 24) by Janet Evanovich Y is for Yesterday (Kinsey Millhone Series # 25) by Sue Grafton The Rooster Bar by John Grisham Magpie Murders by Anthony Horowitz Mississippi Blood (Natchez Burning Series # 3) by Greg Iles The Girl Who Takes an Eye for an Eye (Millennium Series # 5) by David Lagercrantz A Legacy of Spies by John Le Carré Since We Fell by Dennis Lehane Earthly Remains (Guido Brunetti Series # 26) by Donna Leon The Breakdown by B.A. Paris Glass Houses (Chief Inspector Gamache Series # 13) by Louise Penny Deep Freeze (Virgil Flowers Series # 10) by John Sandford Good Daughter: A Novel by Karin Slaughter Heather, the Totality by Matthew Weiner

George Tramountanas: This is the story that ended Straczynski's run on «Amazing Spider - Man» and created a maelstrom that fans continue to debate today. My take is pretty much the same as a lot of fans out there:  I understand the reasons for undoing the marriage, disliked the way it was done, but enjoy the current direction of the book. I often wonder if this story will be remembered in the same light as Ben Reilly's time as Spider - Man, or if history will be even... less kind.

«(c) that either the party to the marriage did not validly consent to it, whether in consequence of duress, mistake, unsoundness of mind or otherwise; (d) that at the time of the marriage either party, though capable of giving a valid consent, was suffering (whether continuously or intermittently) from mental disorder within the meaning of [the Mental Health Act 1983] of such a kind or to such an extent as to be unfitted for marriage.»

Some people seem to think of term life insurance as a kind of a marriage, holding on to the policy in sickness and in health, till death do they part.

And, what kind of love do we want or expect in a marriage?

And really, who doesn't want this kind of marriage?

Frankly, I think every marriage hinges upon this kind of moment: Do I deny the shame she saw peak out before my defenses were up and go back to shaming her, or do I own iDo I deny the shame she saw peak out before my defenses were up and go back to shaming her, or do I own ido I own it?

Not to say that every couple will divorce, but some 40 percent do; you can't divorce - proof a marriage but you most certainly can set up your marriage so it doesn't foster the kinds of situations that often lead to divorce.

Plus, what marital skills do we teach and what kind of marriage are we talking about — traditional marriage?

«On average, no other relationship delivers the kind of stability kids need like marriage does,» Wilcox explains.