Sentences with phrase «kind of meaning by»

Not exact matches

What Facebook means is that the algorithm chooses what to show you — as though the algorithm was some kind of omniscient entity, and not a thing programmed by flawed human beings.

The core of any argument about stories of this kind is that they are protected by the First Amendment because there is a clear public interest in having the information released that outweighs the fact that it was classified, or may have been obtained by illegal means.

If we think of the corporation (for - profit or otherwise) as an instrument or technology by means of which people seek to achieve their goals, then it becomes clear that the rights (or «rights») of different kinds of corporate persons depend not on what kind of entity they are, but on the the demonstrable goals of the human beings involved.

It means having a chance at the kind of life described in 1931 by James Truslow Adams when he coined the term «American Dream»: a life that's «better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement.»

It's all part of the fun and by «fun» I mean the kind of fun my trainer refers to when she says we are going to run hill sprints.

By that, I mean it's better to own the real thing — gold coins or bars — than to own merely exposure to movements in the gold price via some kind of financial product.

While the ideas are by no means earth shattering, they are fundamental to driving the kind of sea - level change needed at Uber:

I mean, it was kind of a foregone conclusion by many people on Wall Street that we would n`t get that 3 percent mark.

Those kinds of personal attacks are meant to wear down and break a target — to push a public figure out of public life by bombarding them with a never - ending avalanche of smears and accusations.

The fact that a large number of buyers are investors and with rental yields becoming minimal (assuming capital growh will be far from what it has in the past) this kind investment is by no means attractive to an somewhat educated investor.

This reality and the conditions that pertain to it mean that you can float on the seas of authority bloat that fuels your vertical, but the efforts that it requires is simply not worth it to build any kind of sustained ranking, as too many levers must float in your favor — such as the website where your link was originally hosted maintaining it's weight before being pillaged by other SEOs capable of basic competitive research — or your competitors being bad enough to not have an SEO who has heard of competitive research — in order for it to be a worthwhile strategy.

By all means take a swing at «Panama vs. Costa Rica» — but be ready to trade the bat for a magnifying glass as soon as you figure out exactly what kind of weather, scenery, population, infrastructure, cost of living, and real estate prices make up your ideal location.

If an investor or fellow entrepreneur tells you that you will save legal fees by doing your seed round with notes instead of stock, what she really means is that the kind of investment that can be done with a note or notes will be less formal, will involve less scrutiny and due diligence, than a round that is priced.

The inventiveness of human beings has devised new means for exploiting the natural resources of the world — tools and machines of all kinds; and materials have been contrived by human beings out of combinations of natural materials in order to satisfy new wants.

There are also the objections that there is no national interest in trying to stop the use of a particular kind of weaponry — you can kill people by any means; and that even if there were such an interest, a weak and limited attack will be ineffective.

Re Ed's comment, ultimately I think we only make the cages ourselves, but those in «authority» are only to happy to «guide» us in by all kinds of means and are really happy to keep us there!

Heidegger's characteristic claim in Sein und Zeit is that there are always three horizons of the disclosure space called temporality which could have this kind of fundamental role in determining what to mean by «be».

Your very statement is contradicted by the fact that you are afraid of doing any kind of RESEARCH and education for yourself... such as researching what the word «evangelical» means.

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

Each word can be viewed as a kind of invitation to the hearer to rearrange his stock of canalized, previously traced meanings by participating in a slightly revised structure of meanings.

The listing of her concerns says a great deal about this new kind of wife, yet does not say it all by any means.

Instead, we mean that we should first try to explain finite physical events by looking for finite physical causes, by looking to the kind of cause that we know exists and operates in our world.

The kind of theology I will be engaged in here, by no means the only kind, could be called heuristic theology; in analogy with some similar activities in the sciences, it «plays» with possibilities in order to find out, to discover, new fruitful ways to interpret the universe.6 In the case of an heuristic theology focused on cosmology, the discovery would be oriented toward «remythologizing» creation as dependent upon God.

I do not mean by this that the gospel is merely a «fairy - tale,» although it is, of course, true that such tales are often told in language of that kind.

Just because one religion has managed to insulate itself from any question by the media does not mean we should let that kind of blackmail go any further.

But what exactly do we mean by this — what kind of peace?

Here I mean by it that Christianity must be accepted in its revealed totality — accepted absolutely, intransigently, without cultural or philosophical or any other kind of accommodation or adaptation.)

I do not mean, by the few references possible in this article, to suggest any kind of canon.

He goes onto note that the traditional way to «overcome» this negative factor was to try to establish what the text meant at or near the time of its composition and treat that as a kind of «essence» of the text's meaning which thereafter is taken as the retrospective norm by which all proposals of what the text might mean now are to be assessed.

For me, these kinds of cartoons are meant to bring joy at the thought that the good we do in this world may be appreciated by all and gives the universe a blessing.

If they were of the latter kind, consistently with the Pauline record, then they were not appearances of what is meant by the term «body».

It would be much easier if he didn't have to play this game with himself... I mean... he knows the outcome before the game even understand he does nt even tell us the damn rules... what kind of a god plays by rules that only he knows and doesn't even tell us... probably because he already knows the outcome... its like playing cards with a stacked deck and he; s the dealer laughing at us all because he has all the aces... I hate gods who do that.

But Buber believes that Paul means by faith belief in a truth, a kind of objective knowledge, whereas surely for Paul faith in Christ is never separated from love to all the members of the body of Christ and to every man.

It can not have done so, because all of our evidence indicates that the kind of theological emphasis associated with the «last supper» in the gospels was by no means the major emphasis in early Christian communal meals from the very beginning, as it would have to have been if this had been the occasion for them.

Also I'm most of the time very good at judging others to some kind of standard that I expect people to live by, meaning I want to put them into religion or at least have some kind of control over them.

A couple who put a plug on their fertility may be acting out a kind of «sorcery» whose purpose is to gain control over nature by wrongful means.

There never was a time in History that atheists exist, only in this present stage of our intellectual developement that they deny His exisrence, but it can be easily explained that they are just part of the dialectical process of having to have two opposing arguments or forces to arrive to the truth, The opposing forces today are the theists or religious believers of all religions and the other are the atheists who denies religion, The reslultant truth in the future will be Panthrotheism, the belief that we are all one with the whole universe with God, and that we Had all to unite to prepare for human survival that will subject us humans in the future.Aided by the the enlightend consevationist, environmentalists, humanists and all of the concerned activists, we will develop a kind of universal harmony and awareness that we are all guided towards love and concern for all of our specie.The great concern of the whole conscious and caring world to the natural disaster in the Phillipines,, the most theist country now is a positive sign towards this religious direction.Panthrotheism means we will be One with God.

«Trinity» did not originally mean, as it does for some later, that there are three kinds of revelation, the Father speaking through creation and the Spirit though experience, by which the words and example of the Son must be corrected; it meant rather that language must be found and definitions created so that Christians, who believe in only one God, can affirm that he is most adequately and bindingly known in Jesus.

«11 By means of a process or an event (it is difficult to define it precisely), one who by all odds could otherwise claim epistemological privilege becomes aware of a complete reversal of the notion of «privilege» finds that an extraordinary kind of truthfulness (which is not «objectivity») attaches to the «partial» perspective glimpsed from the vantage of the struggle of the poor, the discriminated - against, the forgotten - abouBy means of a process or an event (it is difficult to define it precisely), one who by all odds could otherwise claim epistemological privilege becomes aware of a complete reversal of the notion of «privilege» finds that an extraordinary kind of truthfulness (which is not «objectivity») attaches to the «partial» perspective glimpsed from the vantage of the struggle of the poor, the discriminated - against, the forgotten - abouby all odds could otherwise claim epistemological privilege becomes aware of a complete reversal of the notion of «privilege» finds that an extraordinary kind of truthfulness (which is not «objectivity») attaches to the «partial» perspective glimpsed from the vantage of the struggle of the poor, the discriminated - against, the forgotten - about.

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

It is this kind of trust that Jesus meant by «faith.»

Of course Marxists by no means have a monopoly on this kind of dichotomous thinking; all of us tend to think that «God must be on our side.&raquOf course Marxists by no means have a monopoly on this kind of dichotomous thinking; all of us tend to think that «God must be on our side.&raquof dichotomous thinking; all of us tend to think that «God must be on our side.&raquof us tend to think that «God must be on our side.»

To me that kind of experience — inward, replenishing power to do and to endure what by myself would have been impossible — is at the very center of religion's meaning.

The prayer is kind of written in an archaic style, so he even went through the prayer line by line to teach us what the words meant.

Notwithstanding, in the mean while they fight in spirit against the flesh, lest they should fulfill the lusts thereof; and although they feel the flesh to rage and rebel, and themselves also do fan sometimes into sin through infirmity, yet are they not discouraged, nor think therefore that their state and kind of life, and the works which are done according to their calling, displease God; but they raise up themselves by faith.»

Although Mormons are usually friendly, loving, and kind people, they are deceived by a false religion that distorts the nature of God, the Person of Jesus Christ, and the means of salvation.

The circumstances required for sexual reproduction (different in kind from what I mean by «metaphysical division,» although a different branch on the same path of interaction between matter and the élan vital) by more complex entities is of course still more particular (and improbable without the intentional element).

And if it does not so happen that a man with the years sinks into the most trivial kind of despair, from this it does not by any means follow that despair might belong only to youth.

Running parallel also means that mental processes must be synchronized by innumerable specific laws, for all kinds of sensations — red, sweet, cold, painful and so on — all mental images, feelings, thoughts and acts of volition must have a special physiological correspondence.

If, for our purposes, Cotton Mather can stand as a kind of archetype of Puritanism, with his very considerable impulsive energy kept in tight control and consecrated with meaning by its service to the divine plan, Benjamin Franklin may serve, as he has for so many others, as an archetype of the worldly American.