As to your suggestion that I re-do the «study», I find the whole point of the study to be political in nature, trying to prove a scientific point by
some kind of opinion poll and then bragging all over the press that your opinions are right because you claim to have lots & lots of people on your side.
The headline spin from The Sunday Times, however, is that the Tories are back to the same
kind of opinion poll lead that they had at the very start of David Cameron's leadership.
Not exact matches
In the nightly news, respondents to public
opinion polls describe him as a «can do fellow,» «a take charge
kind of a guy,» «admirable for his ability to cut through red tape,» «a true patriot» who was «doing what he was paid to do.»
It's the core foundation for proven reliability in any
kind of statistical endeavor, including
opinion polling.
The Conservative report included an
opinion poll, which found that 48 %
of Londoners support some
kind of ban on strike action.
Public
opinion polls show significant support for limited
kinds of ESC research (no cloning; no creation
of embryos for research purposes).
My colleagues, Michael Henderson and Martin West, and I discovered all
of this when we, as part
of the 2014 Education Next (Ednext)
poll, asked members
of a representative sample
of the U.S. population who had school - age children living with them what
kinds of schools those children had attended as well as their
opinions on many other education - related matters.
I do not participate in
polls, as I do not form my
opinions on the basis
of what other people think, and would not want to encourage the
kind of mindset which does.