A difficult debate on leadership - election reform is looking fundamental to deciding what
kind of party Labour will become.
Not exact matches
I think the really abject weakness
of the
Labour party in Cheltenham clearly played some
kind of part.
In a statement trumpeting her Corbynite credentials, she declared: «Jeremy Corbyn has opened the door to a new
kind of Labour party, one which sticks to its principles, opposes neoliberalism and utilises the knowledge and experience
of its members.»
This uncompromising opposition to the appalling displays
of racism and xenophobia witnessed across the country in the last week, is exactly the
kind of leadership we need from the head
of the
Labour Party.
It has been 18 months since Jeremy Corbyn was first elected as leader
of the
Labour party, promising «a new
kind of politics».
OTOH, I think there are still a lot
of decent people in the
Labour party who want to make it the
kind of party I could support again.
He said: «I was democratically elected leader
of our
party for a new
kind of politics by 60 %
of Labour members and supporters, and I will not betray them by resigning.»
Nevertheless, it does limit the potential for Momentum to encourage activism if they are only interested in certain
kinds of Labour supporters, and if these supporters are then viewed with suspicion by other elements
of the
party and therefore likely to get a frosty reception from non-Momentum activists.
Patrick Diamond assesses the
Labour leader's performance as an opposition leader according to five criteria, and concludes the risk
of a
Labour schism between «principles» and «power» —
of the
kind that rivened the
party in the early 1980s — is considerable.
He then invited Ed Miliband to give his personal views on those issues and invited him to confirm as a matter
of fact that «the
Labour party does not solicit votes or membership
of financial contributions on religious grounds and that it does not offer any
kind of privileged access or dialogue to faith groups
of any
kind».
The irony here is that for once, Corbyn is far more in touch with the public and with the
kind of voters
Labour needs to win back than his parliamentary
party is (the most recent ICM poll, for example, suggests that the voters
Labour's lost since 2015 break about 4:3 for Leave).
The public — and the financial markets — are unlikely to look kindly on a
party that plunges Britain into an era
of instability by refusing to do any
kind of deal with either
Labour or the Conservatives.
Diane Abbott has never held any
kind of ministerial post so lacks experience, she only stood because she wanted to give voters in the
Labour Party an alternative.
So what
kind of party is Paul Kenny, the General Secretary
of the GMB, shaping when he warns
Labour delegates against engaging in «wine bar gossip»?
Chuka Umunna,
Labour MP for Streatham and leading anti-Brexit campaigner «Neither major
party can treat these results as any
kind of endorsement.
It had few
kind words to say about «good»
Labour Party Conference moments, and reserved plenty
of triumphalism for Tory moments.
Primaries are
of two
kinds — open (whereby anyone on the electoral register can have a vote to selecta
Labour party candidate), and closed (whereby only
party members or supporters can have a vote).
Labour made limited progress, but failed to produce the
kind of surge that would allow the
party to claim it is a government - in - waiting.
In a statement yesterday Mr Corbyn said: «I was elected leader
of our
party, for a new
kind of politics, by 60 %
of Labour members and supporters.
I was elected by hundreds
of thousands
of Labour party members and supporters with an overwhelming mandate for a different
kind of politics.
In a statement last night, the
Labour leader said: «I was elected by hundreds
of thousands
of Labour party members and supporters with an overwhelming mandate for a different
kind of politics.
It wishes to see this chamber elected on territorial basis — presumably the
kind of «nations and regions» approach that is now being championed by sections
of the
Labour party.
But in a defiant statement within minutes
of the result being announced, the leader said: «I was democratically elected leader
of our
party for a new
kind of politics by 60 %
of Labour members and supporters, and I will not betray them by resigning.
Naturally,
Labour seized on comments with Ian Lavery, a
Labour MP and the
party's national campaign coordinator, stating the «This
kind of comment shows Jacob Rees - Mogg really is the dictionary definition
of an out -
of - touch Tory.»
Diarist and former
Labour politician Chris Mullin was sceptical about MPs producing their own literature covering what they've been doing in office, telling the room that his successor (MP for Sunderland Central Julie Elliott), «publishes a brochure, from
party funds» but this
kind of thing is «vanity publishing» and «doesn't advance your knowledge very much... [but] I wouldn't object to anything pretty basic and bland.»
On the specific issue
of «window dressing», the increased role
of women in New
Labour seems to me correlated not with some kind of feminist victory within what's left of the historical Labour Party (that, I think, is a myth unfortunately) but rather with the growth of «affective labour» in the work
Labour seems to me correlated not with some
kind of feminist victory within what's left
of the historical
Labour Party (that, I think, is a myth unfortunately) but rather with the growth of «affective labour» in the work
Labour Party (that, I think, is a myth unfortunately) but rather with the growth
of «affective
labour» in the work
labour» in the workplace.
«If people like you were to get behind Jeremy and the
kind of politics that he represents, the
Labour party might have a fighting chance on a national and local level
of being able to change this country for the better.»
Jeremy is going to have to make a transition very quickly from being a backbencher, where he had a
kind of modus operandi, to being leader
of the
Labour party and being under constant scrutiny.
Some loyalists are trying to offset it with the fact that
Labour staved off defeat in Stoke — as if retaining a rock - solid seat against a carpetbagging, tweed - wearing fantasist counts as some
kind of triumph rather than the minimum ask
of an opposition
party in midterm.
Robert Harris, writing not long before the election was called in the New Statesman, «can't quite understand how the members
of the Parliamentary
Labour Party can sit there day after day, month after month, year after year, knowing that they're simply heading towards a
kind of mincing machine at the next election.»
In a defiant statement within minutes
of the result being announced, the leader said: «I was democratically elected leader
of our
party for a new
kind of politics by 60 %
of Labour members and supporters, and I will not betray them by resigning.
I'm not a
labour party supporter specifically, dislike any
kind of tribalism.
But an internal survey has reportedly found 75 %
of Labour party members opposed intervention
of this
kind.
I was democratically elected leader
of our
party for a new
kind of politics by 60 %
of Labour members and supporters, and I will not betray them by resigning.
«We won because the British people did not trust Ed Miliband to manage the economy and so it is unbelievable now to see the
Labour party has been piratically captured in a
kind of social media twitstorm by what Harold Wilson once called a small group
of politically motivated men and I know these people, my friends
It might mean a re-worked system
of intergovernmental relations, or even some
kind of quasi-federal system, possibly involving realigning the House
of Lords as a chamber
of the nations and regions
of the UK — something Ed Miliband first raised at the
Labour Party conference in September 2014.
But it is a curious myth that Unite is some
kind of monolith controlling the
Labour Party and pulling it to the left.
In a defiant statement, Mr Corbyn said last night: «I was democratically elected leader
of our
party for a new
kind of politics by 60 %
of Labour members and supporters, and I will not betray them by resigning.
She said she found her leader «decent, principled and
kind», but added: «However, it is increasingly clear that your position is untenable and that you are unable to command the support
of the shadow cabinet, the parliamentary
Labour party, and most importantly the country.»
«I was elected by hundreds
of thousands
of Labour party members and supporters with an overwhelming mandate for a different
kind of politics... I am not going to betray the trust
of those who voted for me — or the millions
of supporters across the country who need
Labour to represent them.
In this light, Corbyn is seen as a refreshing change, to all that spin, the real deal, in the traditional, Tony Benn, Old
Labour Party way, (apart from his potential, Islington, Margaret Hodge
kind of legacy), not the Hilary Benn, slippery fish, blarite, New
Labour nonsence, that voters have now woken up to.
And notably, in part due to the grim row over anti-Semitism not being tackled in the
Labour Party quickly enough,
Labour did not make the
kinds of additional gains in London boroughs they had suggested, even though in some
of those critical parts
of the metropolis, they ran the Tories extremely close.
But now, we need to start building the
kind of Scottish
Labour Party which Scotland deserves and which Scotland needs.»