Sentences with phrase «kind of position do»

What kind of position does that place us in, when we don't have a clear enough picture of where we've been but we do know now where we want to be?
And while you can send the same resume to the companies that operate within one industry the same kind of positions doing the same thing with your cover letter is not a good move.

Not exact matches

We are talking about being the kind of leader who can sit down, engage and get buy - in, who can take the authority of the position and use it to work with others to get things done.
We don't need M&A to deliver our growth and we are very much focused on our strategy of driving growth by accelerating our core products, by continuing to expand into white spaces like chocolate in China, chocolate here in the US, and continuing to expand our position in all kind of — all retail channels including e-commerce.
We've done some interesting things to figure out how many job candidates we should be interviewing for each position, who are better interviewers than others and what kind of attributes tend to predict success at Google.
«In terms of liquidity, not only do our largest firms now have the right kind and amount of liquidity calibrated to their funding needs and to their likely run risk in stressed conditions, but they also are required to know where it is at all times and to ensure it is positioned or readily accessible where it is most likely to be needed in resolution.»
«Each period, whether a day, a month, a year or longer, represents an infinite number of possible learning opportunities, revealing more and more about correlations, hedging, law, regulation, culture, sizing positions, trading versus holding, activism, bankruptcy law and practice, government action and political impacts on investing, organizational realities and growth, as well as the kind of personal characteristics that are required to do this job well.»
This young man was simply following the gospel and a kind word of warning from his priest which was - «There is no way you are going to wrestle and mount this young lady in compromising positions in a tight High School uniform before I do, get in line sonny!»
Whenever pluralism in theology resists the need for argument, warrants, theory, evidence, praxis, it becomes a kind of Will Rogers pluralism: one where theologians have never met a position they didn't like.
The limitation of S J Samartha's position however, is that he does not posit any «middle being» like the kind Upadhyaya and Panikker posit and is inherent in the idea of SP..
It's kind of like Bono... you may hate his music and abhor his style, but the fact that he can affect change with his position is something that should be acknowledged, don't you think?
Nowhere does he set forth the argument of the book, and on natural rights jurisprudence generally, he uses Arkes as a kind of foil for his own reservations — again, without ever delineating Arkes» position.
as long as they don't allow women to serve in equal positions, it will not only be unfair to women who are in some kind of leadership role, but to its women followers since they are virtually unrepresented
How we think about world order, and how we view the United States» position in the world order, will greatly affect the kind of theorizing we do.
If there are Christians who think the Bible has taken ANY kind of position on guns — a technology that didn't come along until thousands of years after the BIble was written — they should seek professional mental - health are immediately!
We may also have callings in the church as we are elected to positions, ordained, everything in good order, so that people don't become full of the kind of power plays that David decries.
A pastor will assume that the negative responses to a controversial statement he made in a sermon or through a Facebook status can not possibly be worthy critiques of his position, but rather the kind of «persecution» Christians can expect to receive for saying and doing the right thing.
It was actually a gift to a player of Alexis quality in that kind of position and the forward did not waste time to beat the goalkeeper and convert into the empty net to set the tone for Arsenal in the game.
Nah, we need some kind of cover for our defence, Xhaka knows when to go forward and when to stay back, Ramsey will forget his position and go forward to do fancy flicks and turns..
From what I see arsenal is the same, the whole season playing away from home, first of all we hv no defensive system, arsenal are not comfortable at all defending, tactically the manager got so wrong most of the time, playing players put of position, mustafi, average this season, bellerin don't improve, xaka I still don't know what kind of player he is, elneny lack football brain, can't kick forward passes,.
Keylor Navas has done a decent job as Real's number one, but is not the kind of «Galactico» Florentino Perez ideally likes to have in each position of the club's XI.
Perhaps the overwhelming oddness of the position — the shadows of 1966, the constant scrutiny, the on - again, off - again calendar, the increasing irrelevance of international football when set against the all - consuming Premier League, the insistence from the FA that the England manager stand as some kind of moral paragon — drives those that inhabit it to do strange things, to kick out against common sense.
With Keenum I think they are in a good position to draft one of the 4 QBs if one drops but they don't seem as desperate to do so as the Jets or Bills for example — Kind of like the Packers who had Rodgers fall into their lap.
Do u we really know the kind of position Arsenal offered him?
I would prefer to sign him permanently in the summer rather than on loan in the winter.He is a great talent and could really shine in the epl with us.Yeah he is not the kind of superstar that ozil was when we signed him but that does not mean that he is not a top quality player.He could really be a good fit into our team.But I can guarantee you that signing draxler alone next summer will not bring us the epl title.The squad needs strengthening in at least 2 - 3 positions to win the title in what could actually be wenger's farewell season.Going back to draxler though, without a doubt he will only make the squad stronger but I just hope that he is one of the many players heading towards the emirates next season to help us win the title, regardless of where MESU - LEXIS are cum next august....
The only way you can rank players is by the positions they play not this kind of random grading which is done in bad faith aimed at denigrating some of our loyal players who have done such a fantastic job for the club this season.
Cech, Bellerin, Kos, Monreal, Coquelin, Santi, Ozil and Sanchez are already the best in the league in their respective positions, and only a few individuals in Europe if any can do a better or similar kind of job as them.
We have midfielders who do all kinds of jobs other than play in their preferred position.
«We are kind of spoiled with him on our team because he does well in all aspects of the game and can help us out in any position or situation he is put in.»
Do you even know these teams?or even their squad?the kind of players they have at every position?
even when he suffered a serious knee injury, instead of accepting the fact that he would never stick his legs into the spaces that were crucial for someone with straight ahead speed to succeed, the club actually contemplated giving him a chance to play up top where his lack of physicality, size and holding up play talents would been on display for all to see... these are not the actions of a club that really cares about winning at the highest levels, but they are the actions of a club that wasn't interested in spending the necessary resources to purchases a world - class striker, which is usually the most expensive position on the pitch... instead we adopted the horrible phrase «like a new signing» and proceeded to allow this ridiculous experiment to carry on, which ultimately caused some discomfort on the training pitch and inside the locker room as players battled for a position that shouldn't have been theirs for the taking in the first place... don't get me wrong, I believe that Walcott is a talented player, who can help a team reach their goals, if their goals are relatively modest... just look at the teams who supposedly expressed interest in his services and they weren't the kind of clubs who aspire to win at the highest levels... as for the reasons why he hasn't been bitching and moaning about moving on just look at the wage benefits he receives from our club and his obvious desire to enjoy the societal advantages that come with playing in North London for a club with worldwide appeal... so instead of continuing to try to fix a coat with a broken zipper simply move on and buy a new and better coat
we wouldnt have to worry about a box to box scoring if we had another world class attacker with 20 goals in them... i like the ox but i do nt believe he will hit that kind of mark... reus maybe but on all accounts the argentinian kid from palermo is probably worth the risk... but what is for sure is that wenger ai nt go to fill that position on the cheap so if he tries we will miss out again!!!
players like Ozil always present the fans with a bit of a conundrum, especially when times are tough... if you look around the sporting world every once in awhile there emerges a player with incredible skill, like Ozil, Matt Sundin or even Jay Cutler, who have a different way about themselves... their movement seemed almost too lackadaisical, so much so that it seemed to suggest indifference or even disinterest on the part of the player... their posture always appears somewhat mopey and they generally have an unflattering «sour puss» expression on their face... for some their above average skills are enough to keep them squarely in the mix, as their respective teams try desperately to find a way to get the best out of them visa vie player acquisitions or the reworking of tactics... when things go according to planned the fans usually find a way to accept their unique disposition, whereas when things go awry they become easy targets for fans and pundits alike... in the case of Ozil and Sundin, their successes on the international stage and / or with their former teams led many to conclude that if we surrounded such talented individuals with players that have those skills that would most likely bring the best of these players success would surely follow... unfortunately both the Maple Leafs and our club chose to adopt half - measures, as each were being run by corporations who valued profitability over providing the best possible product on the field... for them, they cared more about shirt sales and season tickets than doing whatever was necessary... this isn't, by any stretch, an attempt to absolve Ozil of any responsibility for his failures on the pitch... there is no doubt oftentimes his efforts were underwhelming, to say the least, but this club has been inept when it comes to providing this prolific passer with the kind of players necessary for him to flourish... with our poor man's version of Benzema up front, the headless chickens in Walcott, the younger Ox and Welbeck occupying wide positions far too often and the fact that Carzola, who provided Ozil with great service and more freedom to roam, was never truly replaced, the only real skilled outlet on the pitch was Sanchez... remember to be considered a world - class set - up man goals need to be scored and for much of his time here he has been surrounded by some incredibly inept finishers... in the end, I'm not sure how long he will be in North London, recent sentiments and his present contract situation seem to suggest that he will depart at season's end, but how tragic would it be if once again we didn't put our best foot forward and failed to make those moves that could have brought championship football back to our once beloved club... so when you think about this uniquely skilled player don't be so quick to shift all the blame on his shoulders because he will not be the first or the last highly skilled player to find disappointment at the Emirates if we don't rid the club of those individuals that are truly to blame for our current woes
But I always stay in the same position so that I don't tip off the defense to what kind of play is coming.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Maybe this kind of uncertainty is more common than not in the NFL, but I don't think the Chiefs have been in this position for many years.
Beaty doesn't seem to be doing anything too ridiculous, but he'd never been in a position with this kind of responsibility, he'd never been terribly successful, and he just doesn't seem to know what he's doing
«So I went just to kind of catch a side draft to make sure I was in position getting into Turn 1 and it didn't hold me up when I got there because I was the one coming and I just got too close and the car was moving around and we hit and she had a bad wreck.
And removing Clark from his role as executive director doesn't necessarily mean players want him to be gone from any kind of leadership position, either: as Rosenthal writes, many players «believe the union would benefit from Clark's intelligence, passion, and playing background in another role even if he were removed as executive director.»
He is a kind of coach, the best position to be a coach is the goalkeeper because he doesn't move, and he sees everything.
Personal feelings about Rooney and his woeful form aside, the only way for the skipper to get back to any kind of true form is by getting minutes on the field, improving his fitness and being in position to put chances away when given the opportunity to do so.
Now I don't know about you, but I can not see AW paying an attacking midfielder that kind of money, when we already have a gaggle of players in his position, none of whom are earning anything remotely like that.
And if my baby needed a little guidance latching on, or I needed to fiddle with the positioning to get us both comfortable, any kind of coverage would just make it impossible for me to see what I was doing.
Not every baby likes the same kind of carrier or positioning so you may have to do a bit of experimenting.
I wouldn't trust myself to sleep in the same bed as my 5 - month old, because I have woken up in all kinds of strange sleeping positions and I don't want my realization that I am too heavy a sleeper to be when my baby suffocates.
I'm kind of consciousof it, but for the most part you get your routine on how you position, you know what clothes to wear, what shirts to wear, a quick flick here and it's on, so that those things don't happen where like, they knowit's not going to worry, they're not going to worry or now he just kicks and screams and grabs and you going to see it, But I'm going to go ahead and say you have seen it before, except this time there is milk squirting out.
I know there are all kinds of positions for breastfeeding but, for me, it pretty much forced me to sit comfortably for roughly 20 to 30 minutes at a time, and do nothing else but hold my baby and maybe entertain (OK, definitely) entertain myself with my phone.
It doesn't have to be The Big Boy (he's kind of pricey and big for a hospital birth, but you can use it long after delivery), but you want something that starts off relatively flat and can be positioned in many different ways.
Erroneously, I believed that my partner should just know what kinds of touch felt best or which positions worked for me — which was strange, because I didn't know them myself.
MELANIE SILVERMAN: Well, look, it's kind of my whole philosophy with the eating - don't change it if you don't have to, and I feel the same way about the positioning.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z