If you buy or build a house that is the exact style you want it to be from the beginning, or one that you plan to preserve as it is, you maybe don't ask
those kinds of questions because the answers are more apparent.
Not exact matches
«Over the last 10 to 20 years,
because of blogs and the applicant community and discussion forums, people have developed a really good sense
of what the admissions process looks like, down to what
kinds of questions are asked and how they manage the interview,» Vice Dean Karl T. Ulrich explained in an interview when the school announced the new test.
Facebook has never really grappled with those
questions in any
kind of public way, perhaps
because it is afraid
of the implications if it embraces its nature as a media outlet.
if the first pair would nothave sinned they would still be here and all human
kind would know is the ways
of almighty God and existing on a paradise earth — wich still is comming.the reason he didn't destroy Satan immediately is
because he posed a
Question as to almighty Gods right to sovereignty..
I have to deal with these
kinds of questions at my church though
because they know I go to a Metropolitan Community Church as well.
I hate this
question because telling a stranger I am a pastor invites all
kinds of...
# 2 said yes,
because he'd be busting with curiosity to know the answers to all
kinds of questions that have yet to be revealed.
There is a story
of a churchwarden (senior lay person) who went to hear a modern theologian speak — in the
questions he got up and said that he was disappointed that his vicar wasn't there
because that was the
kind of thing he wanted to hear in his church.
Maybe those words, that
question, actually came right then
because I was feeling how the children he and I had made together, with the
kind hand
of the Divine, they were moulting out
of their childhoods all around us.
Just
because one religion has managed to insulate itself from any
question by the media does not mean we should let that
kind of blackmail go any further.
If the non-believer who is proud, fully desiring, and un-receptive
of practicing their sin
of homosexuality and they love being around the believer then that would make me
question what's wrong with that believer
because the scripture says; «Indeed, all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will be persecuted — 2 Timothy 3:12, No proudly practicing sinner
of any
kind will stay with a believer very long just ask Liz
Now the
question is, what
kind of person are you to throw gays under the bus just
because you believe doing so will better your chances
of getting into Heaven?
Question to the wrier that said that Obama is the wrong
kind of Christian
because you believe that Christianity does not seek to use the government to do God's will.
I've always
questioned the belief that just
because you were born in a poor country or one where a different religion was generally practiced, that that was simply your bad luck or some
kind of karma.
The
question we are putting is a real one only if it is possible, at least in the individual case, for there to be an inculpable apostasy
of that
kind, at least supposed or taken to be apostasy, for,
of course, the man in
question would remain a believer,
because in possession
of the «infused habitus
of faith», but he would be a believer who was mistaken in thinking himself not to be one.
It's already missing the point
because those aren't the
kinds of questions you would ask about a book that speaks to this level
of the soul.
Kass's distinctive concerns must have continued to owe something to the personal decency
of his «saintly» and «moralist» parents, as much to his exposure to the
questioning characteristic
of Great Books Theirs,
because of their quasi-religious community, was not the
kind of quasi-socialism that abstracted from the greatness and misery
of ordinary persons.
So to fundamentalist structures as we've seen rise in post-war America, science is actually a threat to those
kinds of systems
because it gives people the cognitive tools to
question the assumptions
of the collective fundamentalist ideology.
-LSB-...] the
kind who will bake you pineapple tarts during Chinese New Year, no
questions asked; or give you a box
of vitamins simply
because your -LSB-...]
And
because I get annoyed when people try to manipulate answers by way
of rewording the
question, I always request to skip it
because I JUST GAVE YOU THREE WORDS, DAMNIT (ok, two if you're the
kind of person who writes over-thinker as overthinker).
Another reporter followed by asking Brady, «Do you
kind of relish that knowing that you can take all those
questions on, you can deflect away from the pressure
of your teammates,
because you've been dealing with
questions like that in various ways over the last 15, 16 years?»
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years
because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this
kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in
question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The thing is, though, when you line up all
of those names and think about who Juve is most likely to sign — and I guess we can throw Can out
of the mix right now
because we have no clue as to where he wants to go right now — we have another
question pop into our head: Are Cristante and Pelegrini the
kind of midfielders that can truly make Juventus better?
But
because the encouragement that the home visitors gave to parents was fairly general, the results don't necessarily tell us a whole lot about two important
questions: Which
kind of parental behaviors matter most, and which
kind of direction or instruction from home visitors is most likely to incline disadvantaged parents to adopt those behaviors?
after being in this
kind of relationship for all this years you start to
question everything about yourself you think you must be too fat or too ugly for a few years I thought what was the point in leaving him if my own husband doesn't want who else is going to want me I must
of had the conversation about how our situation was affecting me over 1000 times when he did bother to come near me like once every 5 - 8 months he'd say it wasn't enjoyable for him
because I was very awkward but he never understood the reason I was uncomfortable how are you supposed to feel good about yourself when you know your husband would rather look at other women online
MARTIN: I'm going to ask you the last
question,
because you are a person who's operated,
kind of, in the political realm.
Robin Kaplan: Yeah, and so - actually Whitney and Daisy, I'd love for you to
kind of answer this
question as well: After your harassment incident - Whitney, you mentioned that you had a really tough time leaving the house when it was feeding time
because of this incident - so would you say you're pretty nervous about breastfeeding in public after this?
It's
kind of funny,
because when I asked for
questions from you guys, one
of them was...
Well, that's, actually, a huge
question because there are different
kinds of midwives and different choices that women can make in all those areas.
If its a generic
question about what
kind of carrier I would probably choose a woven wrap
because it is the most versatile from infant until they decide they are done being worn.
But you know parenting
questions and sleep
questions and if I had a specific
question I definitely tend to
kind of put it out in my online mama tribe
because I can feel like get a variety
of answers that way.
However, just
because a person is a midwife does not guarantee that they provide this
kind of care; consumers looking for a midwife should ask
questions to determine if a prospective caregiver will be able to provide the
kind of care they seek.
CRISTI LEWIS: It's a very dangerous
question because there really aren't any
because if you are, I tell my women at the end
of that 6 weeks postpartum period, that when our bodies are
kind of ready to make another baby and so if you are not exclusively breastfeeding, you can have a fertility cycle as early as 3 weeks after the birth.
The
question is still not answerable
because you aren't telling us what
kind of taxation you have in mind.
Vint Cerf happened to make the issue snap into focus: while answering a
question from the audience, he mentioned that he expected today's young people to change their behavior as they age
because they'll be maintaining different
kinds of relationships then than they do now.
«Now the lecturers who teach students will set
questions and mark
because we have the best lecturers in Ghana, with regards to the law and the
kind of courses they teach.
In part,
because your
question is sufficiently vague that it is hard to know what you really mean and some examples could clarify the
kinds of things you are thinking about.
And
because it's not politically correct no - one feels very comfortable discussing the positives or negatives disabled employees can bring, or even the more prosaic
questions of whatl that
kind of working environment will be like for everyone.
Steve: Another
question that I know is going to come in,
because they come in whenever we do this
kind of subject.
The
question of how do you prove that seeding a cloud system made it rain more is
kind of tricky
because you have to be able to prove that it would have rained more or less than it would have if you had left it alone which is a
kind of tricky problem.
It seems like the
kind of question that can never be truly answered
because every time someone proposes a solution, someone else can keep asking the annoying
question: What happened before that?
Maybe the employee you interacted with was nice, but I'm guessing that the experience was good
because of factors related to the reason you were at the store: The check - out line moved quickly, you got the
kind of coffee you wanted and fast, you were helped with finding a size, a
question about a product was answered, super-sized smiles aside.
«We were drawn to this collaboration
because in spite
of the different environments, cultures, histories, climates and identities
of the two regions, we were asking the same
kinds of questions about human capacities to address challenging climate conditions,» says lead author Margaret C. Nelson, President's Professor in Arizona State University's School
of Human Evolution and Social Change.
And I suspect it's
because when we do cognition experiments with animals, so we try to measure their cognitive abilities; we put an animal individually in a cage or some
kind of an apparatus and we ask it
questions and we see how well it performs.
The center
of our own galaxy offered the team an excellent lab for studying such
questions because, as Wang says, «we know the
kind of stars that are here in our own downtown.»
These
kinds of questions are particularly challenging
because, unlike diseases affecting other organs, it is hard to know whether drugs can really slow down disease process in the brain, hidden as it is within the skull.
You asked an unbelievably important
question,
because one
of the things that I see happening, now that the microbiota is
kind of in vogue, if you will, is people are getting obsessed with the phylotype that they have, or the printout that they get when testing the microbiota.
Dr. Ruscio: Well, you're really
kind of opening a Pandora's box with this
question because we have this whole world, as I'm sure some
of your listeners are familiar with
of the gut, and more specifically the gut microbiota.
There's been some
questions about them
because they're done in the 60s but the studies were
kind of amazing and the effects that came out.
It's
kind of cool,
because they'll ask the
questions on your show, and they'll listen to the answer, whereas I wouldn't even ask the
question back then.