Sentences with phrase «kind of right about»

Your mom was kind of right about your future boss finding that embarrassing Tumblr post from 2009, but only if you lead your employer to it.

Not exact matches

The right kind of gossip, says Dunbar, is more, «Did you hear about the new account we acquired?»

Proving this to them means your books are infallible, and you're using the right kind of software to pull data instantly, regardless of what an investor may be asking about.

«I am driving a Toyota C - HR right now, which I believe is the kind of car they are thinking about making.»

After the first spike and crash, and after what some folks wrote about it - including your humble servant right here - it would seem that people would realize what kind of outfit this is, and that they would try to exit their shares, and be done with it, having learned a lesson about believing corporate gobbledygook instead of doing research.

Albert Einstein would later write about her, «Her strength, her purity of will, her austerity toward herself, her objectivity, her incorruptible judgment - all these were of a kind seldom found in a single individual... Once she had recognized a certain way as a right one, she pursued it without compromise and with extreme tenacity.»

Right now, the two carriers run on different wireless standards — CDMA for Sprint and GSM for T - Mobile — but about 20 million phones used by Sprint customers can work on both kinds of networks.

Ten years ago, I was ghost writing computer and tech manuals, I was dissatisfied with being overweight, and I was stressed about everything happening in my life, right down to what kind of car I drove.

Different website strategies are right for different kinds of companies, and a lot of buzzed - about applications are of dubious value.

Now I realize that I've written recently about the scourge of stupid and knee - jerk sharing, but in these kinds of specific instances, smart sharing gets the job done right.

If you're thinking about getting an ARM, there are some questions you'll need to answer in order to decide whether it's the right kind of loan for you.

«Done right, these kinds of programs can keep employees focused and excited about their jobs,» the guide says.

Companies like Uber and its rival Lyft, and Instacart, a grocery delivery service, have long faced questions about whether they are creating the right kind of employment opportunities for both the economy and for workers.

Speaking to Politico's Edward - Isaac Dovere about the Daniels incident, Tony Perkins said evangelicals «kind of gave him — «All right, you get a mulligan.

«There's nothing wrong with the company as it exists right now... I'm not talking about the company as I, kind of, took it over six months ago.

No one has the right to whine about their company, their industry, or the kind of business that they're in — ever again.

If you are the kind of income investor who's happy with dividends that are steady and can grow year after year, or even decades, and don't care as much about yields — 3M yields 2.3 % currently — 3M is a right fit for your portfolio.

I think there is a broader point for all kinds of selection scenarios, including investing: its all about finding the right fishing holes.

When you think about what Reinhart and Rogoff's book says, it kind of gets to an answer but it's not the right way to look at things; there are many more variables to analyze the situation with.

They are most likely talking about profiles and do not have the connection to the right kind of research established.

For example, a welcome program that provides new inbound leads with helpful information about the problems your product or service solves, the kinds of companies you help, and where to find additional information sounds right, doesn't it?

If you are wondering about how to best invest in mining, or what kinds of options are out there, attending the upcoming Silver and Gold Summit in San Francisco on November 20th would be a good step in the right direction.

The sort of remark I have in mind is the kind where, in a post about an unrelated topic, an author feels the need to bring up some moral accusation against the writer he is discussing and make very clear that he, the blogger, is on the right side of that debate.

But it takes a special kind of nerve to caution conservatives about «the high costs of tying a church with a rich tradition of social teaching to the right end of politics,» when you are on board with efforts at the left end of politics to alter and thereby betray that tradition.

We should be happy about how far we have come as a species via the hard work and dedication of man kind... we should be stopping and looking at the big picture and think about how far we have come in 2000 years... we have made tremendous progress in so many ways and it is really sad that instead of doing the right thing and giving mankind credit where credit is due, you fall back on 2000 year old beliefs and you thank a god who has never been proven to exist.

yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?

Kind of blows holes in the Right's lies about him being a «devout Muslim», although i don't know what that means one way or another anyway...

Oh, forget this debate about religion and cheer up folks because NASA's Special Effects department keeps discovering alien planets left and right and they're gonna build us some kind of tin - can «Ark» to take us there just before we destroy this Earth...

He was probably right, but I couldn't help thinking that perhaps he also only felt so strongly about the issue because of the kind of church he grew up in.

To hold that same - sex marriage is part of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT people the equal protection of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love of the two people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.

And just what kind of buffoon do you think would believe in something with can not be proven??? Oh right, religious people, sorry I forgot about them.

Daniel I think that you are right that many times a person's unresolved past produces the kind of dysfunctionality to where even though they desire to do good, they end up harming others due to subconscious beliefs about themselves.

If being intelligent and compassionate makes Obama a «wrong» kind of Christian, what does that tell you about the «right» kind?

I'm ready to see the same type of article written about Romney & Mormonism... if you are going to question if a candidate is «the right or wrong» kind of Christian, I believe a great number of the Christian Right would be stunned at some of the practices & beliefs of the Mormon fright or wrong» kind of Christian, I believe a great number of the Christian Right would be stunned at some of the practices & beliefs of the Mormon fRight would be stunned at some of the practices & beliefs of the Mormon faith.

It is also rooted in a certain kind of American exceptionalism that has a history on the right, but that conservatives don't talk about very much.

The reason is not that it is psychologically harmful or that there are not good reasons for it (there is always reason for it, and there is probably always room for the right kind of anxiety or concern about ourselves and the world).

People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

If this view of religion is right, then it follows that as a scholar and a religious person I must be explicit about the kinds of religious commitments I have and the ways in which they enter into my intellectual activity.

Essentially, this is a set of sexual Geneva conventions: You never knew it, but not only do you have the right to minimal standards of treatment if you ever become a prisoner of war, but when you were five, you had the right to learn at school all kinds of things about what some people like to do in bed, and if your parents thought that really they'd rather you didn't hear about that stuff at school, or at least not yet, they were... well, they were violating your rights.

It is an observable, contingent, historical fact that our minds are of just the right kind to be able to figure out a great deal about the universe, while keeping the figuring - out process challenging.

It's kind of like how the verse about how even the devil can quote scripture for his own purpose is used — anyone else can always turn right around and use it on you.

The ACLU jumped to their defense and there was all kinds of talk about «Freedom of Speech» and the «Right to Peaceably Assemble.»

Right now, however, doors are slamming and voices are raised upstairs, so I think I'd better go put my own assumptions about children and parenting, if not education right now, into some kind of forceful acRight now, however, doors are slamming and voices are raised upstairs, so I think I'd better go put my own assumptions about children and parenting, if not education right now, into some kind of forceful acright now, into some kind of forceful action.

These Doctors could not even understand these things mess up my Immune system & cause blood sugar spikes & crashes and puts protein and blood in my Urine, & they falsely called me delusional about the adverse reactions & they kept forcing them thing on me against my will, in one medication after another till my Guts and Kidneys severely bleed & I still can not get my records straightened out or get the right kind of Doctors that I need.

You go on about how human rights are abused «by atheists,» where you live, but ironically most Western atheists strongly disapprove of the kinds of authoritarian regimes that do that.

Yes, there are times when we may disagree about some of the particulars of what «good,» «kind,» «right», etc...

There is a third kind of language in the Creeds, and that is symbolical language, the language which talks, for instance, about God's «right hand.»

It may well be true that self - consciousness about standing on such shaky ground is the reason why the talk of a woman's «right» to abortion services has become an uncritical mantra, rising to a aggressive assertion when challenged, for this kind of feminist.

The part about not wearing fabric made from tow kinds of thread can be ignored, and the part about loving your fellow man is obviously something added recently by liberals, right?