Sentences with phrase «kind of sense does»

What kind of sense does it make to make a ton of AAA games centered around ultra niche heroes, when Wonder Woman hasn't been given the proper video game treatment?

What kind of sense does that make?

What kind of sense does that make?

Not exact matches

I don't know how you are actually going to build any kind of barrier that makes sense across such an incredible length.

Did it make any sense to treat claims about Clinton and Obama being literal, sulphur - smelling demons with the same kind of objectivity as allegations about email use?

They're doing it with a clear, narrow sense of purpose, a sublime customer experience, and the kind of coherence that seems all but impossible when a company gets old and big, and its founding idea lost to time and well - intended meddling.

When I first joined Uber, I was actually hired as a DevOps manager, which was kind of funny in the sense that I literally didn't know what DevOps was.

However, Mr. Zuckerberg insisted that the company does not discriminate against Republican employees and that its definition for what kind of language should be kept off the platform was rooted in common sense.

I was kind of like I said interested in gambling or at least speculating or figuring things out and then taking a calculated gamble and what they were telling me was don't try, there were saying that no one can beat the market and the stock prices are efficient and just through simple observation looking at the newspaper and they used to have the 52 - week high low prices in the newspaper, it seemed unreasonable that you know the fair price was 51 day and eight months later, it was 120, and that was pretty much every stock had that kind of range every year and it didn't make sense to me that the fundamentals of the underlying businesses were actually changing that much.

Hope this doesn't put off new Tesla owners who see this charging at the superchargers, the guy must have more money than sense to spend that kind of cash on one car just so that he can say he has an electric estate car for his dog, nice gimmick but he is not going to be offsetting the cost of fuel anytime soon.

It does kind of bum me out that I may have lost a small opportunity to take advantage of bearish markets but no sense in kicking myself too hard, it doesn't bother me as much as it used to and I think that's because amidst not being able to purchase discounted blue chip stocks, I ended up buying a house with help from my parents, and now I am a home owner with no mortgage (just a debt to my parents which I hope to pay off ASAP).

«The other thing that's kind of worked for them so far has been the fact that they have a mix of agility and skill in the sense that individual countries at five or 10 million are agile enough to do a lot of these things, create a case, data, case study and then present it at the EU level.

And frankly I think it's a good trend in the sense that if you want to legitimize a new form of money it has to be regulated to some degree so that people won't get ripped off by fraud, like people selling Bitcoin they don't actually own or you know this kind of thing.

Does that make any kind of logical sense???

They frequently began with a short historical introduction in which the king would document the kind deeds he had done for the vassal so as to engender a sense of gratitude.

yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?

Does that make any kind of sense to you...?

In this sense it is true that anyone who does not know God even though he may entertain all kinds of hopes, is ultimately without hope, without the great hope that sustains the whole of life (cf. Ephesians 2:12).»

Indeed, we call it a «process» only in the most honorary sense, because all it does it accept assumptions at the input end and send them straight thru the decision engine untouched to emerge unchanged at the output end, kind of like creamed corn when you've got the flu.

I am sensing we are going to have to do some kind of «intervention» on the both of you....

To get married in order to have sex, which we all have an urge to have, does make some kind of sense.

In ancient days, when stars and planets were thought to be capricious gods, this did make some kind of sense.

I could see someone that's Catholic and not using birth control getting stressed out and starting to wonder if this kind of life truly is required by God or if it truly does make any sense.

Anyways, most of my arguments can be summed up in one sentence: hey, how about you use some common sense, be kind, love everyone, and don't be such an ass?

Of course Jesus had some kind of sense of humor, most people do, and if you didn't it would make him a very cold persoOf course Jesus had some kind of sense of humor, most people do, and if you didn't it would make him a very cold persoof sense of humor, most people do, and if you didn't it would make him a very cold persoof humor, most people do, and if you didn't it would make him a very cold person.

Please do not presume to claim a ban on all guns remotely makes any kind of sense.

Although icons of Jesus or the saints claim to be some kind of «likeness,» they do not claim to be «real» in the sense that the scientists cited in Popular Mechanic sought the «real» image.

But even life in this generous sense of membership in creation does not protect us, as we know, from the dangers of avarice, of selfishness, of the wrong kind of abundance.

Alone Truly are all the people yet in the company of the otherly kind does one bring about a sense of togetherness, as an aliveness of sorts.

Sometimes we expect one kind of feeling (because of previous experience or biases or preconditioning) and don't sense what is really there.

I'm sure we all make up all kinds of stories to «make» sense of life, but the truth is, a very large portion of life does not make sense.

In this way the ontological argument, by drawing out the presupposition of metaphysical understanding, indicates that the choice before us is between holding that there is a God and that «reality» makes sense in some metaphysical manner, whether or not we can ever grasp what that sense is, and holding that there is no God and that any apparent metaphysical understanding of reality can only be an illusion which does not significantly correspond to the ultimate nature of things — unless this «nihilism» be regarded as a kind of metaphysical understanding instead of its blank negation.

Does that make any kind of sense?

Actually Brehvik does not consider himself a christian in his words, «in the strictest sense», so the first part of your point is moot... Secondly I think a fairer statement would be that not «all» muslims are violent extremists, as many who don't live in western countries are, as their book does instruct them to kill any and all who do not procalim allah as the one god and mohammed as his prophet... As far as having extreme passion for one's beliefs, if someone was truly to be an «extreme» christian that person would be completely loving as this was Jesus» command to love both God and everyone... to take that to the extreme would mean «extreme» loving, like the radical kind of love that caused Jesus to endure the cross for the sins of us all... includinig the man who committed this atrocity and yes any and all of the muslim's who have committed similar things.

Yeah, if we only had the resources to expend on this kind of non sense and this was our biggest problem we'd be doing okay.

Perhaps I should not have been shocked, but it did give me a sense of wonder and amazement that he would be considering taking this kind of step toward Christianity.

In that sense, the Presbyterian debates do not feel like friendly arguments over the breakfast table, or even the more heated kinds of exchanges that might take place in the presence of a marriage counselor.

I truly believe that love can cover a multitude of sins — we have been involved in and with people who do fostering and have seen children who have experienced different kinds of abuse transformed through unconditional love and acceptance — sure the pain of what they have experienced may still be there but the unconditional love they receive transforms them from broken to not so much broken... if that makes sense?

The problem that Mr. Bottum correctly identifies is that those such as Chomsky who do not believe in nonmaterial beings literally can not make sense of the kinds of things done by those who still speak and act in powerful mythic symbols.

That kind of gratuitous conflict does nothing for anyone except a few alienated 18 year olds that need a sense of community.

[6] If the mind were material, it would only know things individually as the senses do but would not know them as belonging to kinds of thing.

«In my world, you don't get to call yourself «pro-life» and be against common - sense gun control — like banning public access to the kind of semiautomatic assault rifle, designed for warfare, that was used recently in a Colorado theater.

The best I can do is try to make my own kind of sense out of it.

Thus Hartshorne holds that the term «feeling,» for instance, can be said to be analogical in this sense because, or insofar as, it applies to all entities of the logical type of individuals, including the unique individual God, but does so in suitably different senses to all the different kinds or levels of individuals, with its sense being infinitely different in its application to God (1962, 140).

At the moment I think, we might rather try to be life - giving in some other sense, as looking for some kind of project or social work we can do together (as I think it is very important for a relationship to not just focus on each other forever).

If our style of life is a materialism, it is of an oddly disembodied kind, and does more to shield us from the senses than to liberate them.

Do you think audiences will kind of sense that freedom on the next record?

I like the idea of showing this kind of humility and compassion, but I think it would be better done using acts that make sense in the modern context.

This is sufficient for our faith — that we have a trustworthy guide — and this fits with our common sense in a way that other kinds of claims about Jesus do not.

Anyone who looks with sensitivity at the suffering of the poor and powerless, suffering that most of us do not deliberately intend, has a sense that some kind of cunning evil that is too strong for us and dehumanizes us has captured and controls the systems and structures in which we live.