On the Ed Next blog, Mike Petrilli writes about some of the approaches education reformers should consider embracing if we want to give less affluent kids a better shot at moving up: 1) working harder to identify talented children from low - income (and middle - income) communities and then providing the challenge and support to launch them into the New Elite via top - tier universities, and / or 2) being more realistic about
the kind of social mobility we hope to spur as education reformers.
The second strategy is to be more realistic about
the kind of social mobility we hope to spur.
Not exact matches
They did not have the
kinds of opportunities for free public education or upward
social mobility that we have.
What used to be considered «the engine
of social mobility» (see Fareed Zakaria in the new Time magazine), the incubator
of productive and successful citizens (and parents), the school is now treated as some
kind of barometer
of caste and class.
Ofsted's national director
of education, Sean Harford, has even said the inspectorate would research the link between certain
kinds of curriculum and
social mobility, and use any findings when inspecting the curriculums schools choose for their pupils.