Use the right
kind of statements in your Summary of Qualifications, backed up with a strong list of keywords in your Core Competencies.
I figure that at the very least, it teaches people not to make
those kinds of statements in my presence.
Why make
this kind of statement in the first place?
Just to have the two of them next to each other, I just felt like even that is
a kind of statement in some way.
Not exact matches
In a controversial
statement this week, President Donald Trump highlighted Norway as the
kind of country from which he'd like more emigrants to the United States.
That's not exactly the
kind of statement that instills confidence
in a firm trying to distance itself from trouble.
So the starting
statement was
kind of true — except that I gave you three examples that shoot it down
in a second.
«Nike
in no way condones child abuse or domestic violence
of any
kind and has shared our concerns with the NFL,» Nike said
in a
statement.
«There has been significant debate surrounding the FDA letter that
KIND received, as many
in the nutrition community rose to
KIND's defense,» said Joe Cohen, SVP
of communications at
KIND in a
statement to Fortune.
«Private companies will ultimately develop these energy breakthroughs, but their work will rely on the
kind of basic research that only governments can fund,» Gates said
in a
statement.
«By building a first -
of - its -
kind organization with a mission to focus exclusively on founders working on tough tech, The Engine aims to enable startups like Suono Bio to solve some
of the world's most complex challenges, «The Engine CEO and managing partner Katie Rae told Business Insider
in an emailed
statement.
Richard Lumb, Accenture's group chief executive for financial services, says
in an emailed
statement: «Through this first -
of - its -
kind analysis
of real - world cost data we draw a clearer line under blockchain's value to investment banks.
The event, which was founded by the 92nd Street Y, doesn't have a specific policy on donor premiums, it said
in a
statement:» #GivingTuesday is an open - source movement, and we encourage organizations and individuals around the world to come up with all
kinds of creative ways to do fundraising.»
This
kind of increase, researchers said
in a
statement, could be as simple as swapping one serving
of red or processed meat for nuts or legumes, such as beans, lentils, peas, and peanuts.
And we
kind of know a mission
statement, but culture is where we put all the eggs
in that basket.»
Outlined
in the documents are rules about what
kinds of statements are considered too offensive to allow, how much violence the site allows
in videos — including Facebook Live, which has been the subject
of significant controversy recently — and what to do with sexually suggestive imagery.
The agency added
in its
statement that
KIND may use the word «healthy» as part
of its corporate philosophy, and
in a separate letter to the company, potentially on the wrappers
of the bars themselves, where it isn't represented as a nutritional content claim.
«People come to Facebook to share all
kinds of things — whether that's updates that are happy, sad, funny or thought - provoking,» a company spokeswoman said
in a
statement to PCMag.
«Many people tend to think
of Tesla as just a luxury or performance brand — they
kind of put us
in that category forever — but that isn't the mission
statement, that's not what we're actually trying to do.»
B.C.'s anti-pipeline premier wasn't around to stop a joint
statement that sounded decidedly pro-oil —
in a mealy - mouthed, premiers» - summit
kind of way
«We have long been concerned about the possibility
of this
kind of snooping, which is why we have continued to extend encryption across more and more Google services and links,» Mr. Drummond said
in a
statement.
«This
kind of data collection is fundamental to how the internet works,» Facebook said
in a
statement to Reuters.
In the
statement, Lenny Valdivia Bautista, Executive Director General
of ASFI, expressed that it is imperative to remember that the Central Bank
of Bolivia (BCB) has forbidden the circulation and use
of virtual currencies
of any
kind.
«Congress must take concrete steps to strengthen the AV START Act with the
kind of safeguards that will prevent future fatalities,» he said
in a
statement on Monday.
«I ask the Prime Minister, how is that
statement and the creation
of the Office
of the Parliamentary Budget Officer
in any way, shape or form compatible with the
kind of cheap partisan attacks the Minister
of Finance made against the Parliamentary Budget Officer and against his observation that the job
of the Parliamentary Budget Officer was to be a sounding board for the government?
If you're the
kind of person who always avoids interest charges by paying your
statement balance
in full each month, you should be earning the most valuable rewards you can.
Life
in this context is meant to be a daring
statement of what is at stake
in this
kind of choice.
When some asshat like you, just sayin, HeavenSent, Bob, etc. make blanket
statements and refuse to respond to corrections, criticisms, or valid points refuting those
statements, then there is no point
in bringing up any
kind of argument.
What I often find is that the Muslim participants
in dialogue groups will make a
kind of set
statement reiterating how they see things.
-- Pat Robertson These
statements should be no more frightening
in an Islamic or a Christian context — this
kind of rhetoric is a serious threat no matter who it comes from.
These
statements, made during evaluation sessions, suggest the
kinds of changes people undergo
in growth groups.
Stephen Toulmin echoes these sentiments
in an elegant
statement on the cosmos understood on the model
of our «home»: «We can do our best to build up a conception
of the «overall scheme
of things» which draws as heavily as it can on the results
of scientific study, informed by a genuine piety
in all its attitudes toward creatures
of other
kinds: a piety that goes beyond the consideration
of their usefulness to Humanity as instructions for the fulfillment
of human ends.
On the basis
of the First Amendment, as well as the general principles
of the Constitution, he opposed public payment for chaplains
in Congress and the military, spoke out against national proclamations
of days
of prayer (though as president he did «recommend» them) and while president vetoed congressional efforts to incorporate churches
in the District
of Columbia (fullest
statement, V: 103 - 105) At the same time, Madison frequently opined that it was appropriate for private citizens to support chaplains and various
kinds of semiorganized public religion through voluntary contributions (V: 104,105)
*
In the first place, while the language
of religion is metaphorical, this blanket
statement needs to be broken down so that we see that certain distinctive forms
of speech are appropriate to certain distinctive
kinds of biblical reference.
A unified, universally valid
statement of this
kind could be accompanied by quite a number
of theologies juxtaposed
in a pluralist way, not contradicting each other
of course, but not susceptible
of being positively incorporated into a higher synthesis.
A precise
statement of what the correspondence or the clash might be is not easy to produce and is not necessary here, since our main purpose
in these remarks is merely to emphasize the point that value experiences depend for their character upon the
kinds of relationships that exist between subject and object.
It may be that the relational view
of humanity embedded
in the social
statements of so many traditions already offers that
kind of convergence.
We are not expected,
in a
kind of intellectual works righteousness, to systematize the contents
of our faith time and again
in statements of faith.
Assuming that this
statement of principles for a conception
of human rights backed by neoclassical metaphysics can be given a detailed formulation and defense, we may repeat that a moral and political theory
of this
kind is the more important because the alternative it offers is largely neglected
in the contemporary discussion.
(available on the web, viewed by over 3,000) contains a
kind of «doctrinal
statement» on 3 days and 3 nights (Tuesday crucifixion and Friday resurrection) and I think it can be regarded as valid until someone refutes the findings and evidence contained
in it.
Actually Brehvik does not consider himself a christian
in his words, «
in the strictest sense», so the first part
of your point is moot... Secondly I think a fairer
statement would be that not «all» muslims are violent extremists, as many who don't live
in western countries are, as their book does instruct them to kill any and all who do not procalim allah as the one god and mohammed as his prophet... As far as having extreme passion for one's beliefs, if someone was truly to be an «extreme» christian that person would be completely loving as this was Jesus» command to love both God and everyone... to take that to the extreme would mean «extreme» loving, like the radical
kind of love that caused Jesus to endure the cross for the sins
of us all... includinig the man who committed this atrocity and yes any and all
of the muslim's who have committed similar things.
However, based on
statements like «Christ did not rise from the dead and was most likely eaten by dogs,» you
kind of get the idea that this guy doesn't believe
in the deity
of Christ.
All that can be attained by aetiological inference
of that
kind taking as its starting - point concrete reality,
in other words the supernatural history
of redemption and grace
of man as he is, forms the content
of the
statement.
His
statement that those who participated
in the resurrection
of the dead would be like angels, not marrying or giving
in marriage (Mk 12:25 and parallels), implies a
kind of incorporeal existence.
(As Joshua Reynolds put it
in the eighteenth century, «There is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labor
of thinking») However, we can keep this problem from getting out
of hand if we remember that different
kinds of statements are verified
in different ways.
It is logic, not process philosophy, which insists that one can not both describe Jesus as a man and also say that God's indwelling
in him differs
in kind from his indwelling
in other men: since a study
of the raw material confirms the first
statement, logic demands a modification
of the second.
So when I assert that I believe
in God, I am willing to back up this
statement with some
kind of justification, reasons, or even empirical evidence.
In fact, Scalfari and the pope have had these kinds of sort - of on - the - record conversations five times in recent years, several of which prompted the Vatican to release similar statements, (that is, despite the Vatican saying «without however giving him any interviews» in their recent statement
In fact, Scalfari and the pope have had these
kinds of sort -
of on - the - record conversations five times
in recent years, several of which prompted the Vatican to release similar statements, (that is, despite the Vatican saying «without however giving him any interviews» in their recent statement
in recent years, several
of which prompted the Vatican to release similar
statements, (that is, despite the Vatican saying «without however giving him any interviews»
in their recent statement
in their recent
statement).
In that it's completely indicative
of your inability to make any
kind of sentient
statement, yeah, dearie.
Niebuhr's
statement implies no relativism,
in which somehow everything is true, but rather a
kind of believing agnosticism,
in which there is no claim to know what else is true or false besides one's own belief.